Discussion and Debate Community Thread

[Basil II the B.S]

>IRA doesn't do it anymore, so we can import Muslims to kill, rape and murder us.

The dude? The ?
Why are liberal arguments so ing stupid?

edit: Joaquin Castro, brother and chairmain of Julian's campaign, is publishing the names of those who donated to Trump campaigns with the obvious intent of having them fired or harassed and ruining their lives

https://twitter.com/Castro4Congress/...76680182718464

This is not civil behaviour, this is an act of war by liberals against American people.

edit 2:

Lying liberal journalist claims she ''misspoke'' when she claimed that Trump called for the extermination of Latinos.
https://twitter.com/NicolleDWallace/...90765231304704

Sue her for libel and jail her.

[The spartan]

How does one import Muslims? Do you order them off Amazon?

[Basil II the B.S]

You give them papers to make them stay in your country. What a stupid question spartan.

[The spartan]

I don't think the US has papers that can make Muslims stay in our country.

[AqD]

WTF US is talking to Taliban?? Are they giving up? There should be no peace until every single of them are dead.

[Prodromos]

Hey guys, check out the IMDB page for Tucker Carlson's show. The "More like this" suggestions are literally all Nazi propaganda films.

Tucker Carlson Tonight (TV Series 2016– ) - IMDb

[Vanoi]

Thats just hilarious

[95thrifleman]

WTF US is talking to Taliban?? Are they giving up? There should be no peace until every single of them are dead.

That's a bloody stupid suggestion. Imagine if Britain had taken that position with the IRA.

[Papay]

WTF US is talking to Taliban?? Are they giving up? There should be no peace until every single of them are dead.

Taliban currently control half of Afghanistan. The war was lost long-long ago. Its just that no president has the b@lls to say the truth to the American people

[Basil II the B.S]

Canada is the latest country to find out that diversity is bad for social cohesion:
https://globalnews.ca/news/5740360/f...ersity-values/

[Lord Oda Nobunaga]

I doubt Canada will ever notice. Wouldn't be surprised if whoever said that immediately got sacked and replaced by a Liberal complacent Punjabi.

[Love Mountain]

First of all, that's not what the article says. Second, to conclude that diversity is bad for "social cohesion" you need to, at the very least, identify other possible factors and explain why they are wrong.

[Basil II the B.S]

I doubt Canada will ever notice. Wouldn't be surprised if whoever said that immediately got sacked and replaced by a Liberal complacent Punjabi.

Allegedly, Trudeau listened. In practice, I doubt it.

First of all, that's not what the article says. Second, to conclude that diversity is bad for "social cohesion" you need to, at the very least, identify other possible factors and explain why they are wrong.

Actually it does. It points out that focusing on diversity highlting differences between groups has the opposite effect of uniting the community and that a Canadian government should focus instead of promoting common values. Something that anyone below 10 is probably able to tell as well.

You legitimately have to go to university to think otherwise.

[mongrel]

Allegedly, Trudeau listened. In practice, I doubt it.



Actually it does. It points out that focusing on diversity highlting differences between groups has the opposite effect of uniting the community and that a Canadian government should focus instead of promoting common values. Something that anyone below 10 is probably able to tell as well.

You legitimately have to go to university to think otherwise.

What common values? The migrants are French and English, the natives have their own distinct cultures. It's almost as if you want to replace these people's cultures with something else. Ironic.

Thats just hilarious

It is uncanny.

>IRA doesn't do it anymore, so we can import Muslims to kill, rape and murder us..

No requirement to import anyone, Great Replacement types are killing enough people as it is thank you very much.

[sumskilz]

What common values?

Probably something like whatever is going on here:

[sumskilz]

Plus hockey.

[Love Mountain]

Actually it does. It points out that focusing on diversity highlting differences between groups has the opposite effect of uniting the community and that a Canadian government should focus instead of promoting common values. Something that anyone below 10 is probably able to tell as well.

Uh huh.

It points out that focusing on diversity highlting differences between groups has the opposite effect of uniting the community

vs

Canada is the latest country to find out that diversity is bad for social cohesion:
https://globalnews.ca/news/5740360/f...ersity-values/

Not the same thing. Moreover, Basil is leaving out most of the context, which is understandable, since his goal here appears to be sensationalism and attention, rather than accuracy.

The task force deputy ministers heard this idea among many during meetings last year looking at what the government could do to guard against a possible rise in extremism and populism domestically.

The group was told to encourage more public conversations and debate focused on “us” rather than “us-versus-them” narratives to foster “social cohesion.”

Reminds me of how Sargon of Akkad reads articles, he doesn't ever tell you the main point of the article.

You legitimately have to go to university to think otherwise.

Ironically, a good "leftist" university student would be able to tell you why Basil misrepresented the article.

[PikeStance]

It is discussions like these that drive people away;

The highlights of the article

“Social cohesion must become a new lens of policy-making. In order to achieve this, the government needs to build connections across difference, foster greater empathy and bring the focus back to the majority (i.e. the middle groups),” officials wrote in the documents.

He said polarization of opinion can cause some to become resentful of minority groups perceived to be getting special benefits, such as housing or social assistance, at others’ expense. These sentiments are most common among a majority of people who fit into a “middle group” category, marked by moderate views between the extremes of “cosmopolitans with open values” and “nationalists with closed values.”


That’s why Canada was advised to “build social solidarity” by avoiding pitting the interests of one group against another in public communications. Rather, Canada should “elevate the ‘more in common’ message and demonstrate the falsehood of narratives of division,” according to Dixon’s presentation.

The basics of the article is to avoid "us vs them" and foster open communication that foster what all of the groups have common and building on that. Focusing on what is different is counter productive for building a better Canada. At least that is what I am reading from it. I have no idea what lens anyone else is looking at it from.

[Love Mountain]

No that's exactly what it says. It has nothing to do with "diversity being bad for Canada". In fact, the article does not make a qualitative judgement on it whatsoever.

[Basil II the B.S]

If you promote ''diversity'' then you are telling people that they belong to different groups and they should celebrate their differences rather than what they have in common.