I would like to make the case that player FM stats should not always be so poor in future versions as they are now. If you view a FM from an AI faction, their stats are usually much better than your FM stats, but I've been told that I should never expect my FMs to be comparable.
The extremely poor FM stats hurt my ability to get into the game. It would be one thing if some of my FMs had high loyalty and some of them low, but 90% of them are just terrible. I mouse over their loyalty and I read about how untrustworthy and how ready to backstab they are. Influence is less than a stuffed olive, etc. Even the command trait remains low despite winning a dozen battles. While command stars might not matter to game mechanics much except for auto-resolving battles, I want them as a signature of a victory.
In another thread I read that putting your FM in the capital with the FL should boost loyalty. It sometimes helps a bit. In other cases I've left a new FM there for 5-6 years with the FL and they still have 1-2 loyalty, or even 0.
"You shouldn't want better FM stats" arguments are non-starters. Give me some reason to care about these FMs in addition to their cavalry charge. Give me a reason to try to develop them, educate them. Right now in 2.04 most are more of a liability than a help.




Reply With Quote






