Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Romans and Alpine Celtic

  1. #1

    Default Romans and Alpine Celtic

    The following is an old thread from the org. Interesting

    ---
    Recent genetic data suggests that ancient Italic tribes, including the Romans, were closely related to the Alpine Celts who founded the Hallstatt and La Tène cultures. In other words, the Romans conquest of Gaul was more like the final part of the unification process of the Italo-Celtic tribes.

    Genetic evidence

    The S28/U152 SNP was discovered as a subclade of haplogroup R1b about 2 years ago and tests have become more widespread over the last year. The original trend seem to point at a Celtic origin for this haplogroup, with a possible origin in the Black Forest or Switzerland.

    R1b-S28 was found in the area of extension of the La Tene culture, along the Rhine, Moselle and Meuse valleys north to Belgium, around the Alps in Eastern France (Lorraine, Vosges, Jura, and maybe as far as Auvergne), and in northern Italy, known as Cisalpine Gaul by the Romans. The haplogroup was also observed at lower frequency in Britain, which is compatible with the establishment of Belgic tribes there prior to the Roman conquest.

    But it now appears that R1b-S28 is also the most common subclade of R1b in Italy, even in the south and in Sardinia. It could indeed be the original haplogroup of the Italic tribes, prior to the arrival of the Etruscans, the Greeks and the Phoenicians.

    The coalescence age for R1b-S28 haplotypes is around 3,500 years ago, about 1,000 years before the beginning of the European Bronze Age. This makes it possible for a common origin of the Alpine Celts and Italic tribes. Little is known of the Italics before the mythical foundation of Rome in 753 BCE.

    In all likelihood, the ancestor of all/most R1b-S28 people lived in the Western Hallstatt culture, around the Black Forest. This happens to be the place where the highest STR diversity is found for this haplogroup, which usually means that it is the place of origin.

    Linguistic evidence

    This theory is further corroborated by linguistic evidence. Italic and Celtic languages belonged to the same Italo-Celtic family. It is known that at the time of Julius Caesar Gaulish dialects were still mutually intelligible with Latin, meaning that the two linguistic groups had not split so long ago.

    Archeological evidence

    Archeological evidence suggest that the Italics may not have colonised the Italian peninsula before 1,000 BCE. The nearest and most probable place of origin of the Italics was the Alps region, where the Hallstatt culture (1,200-475 BCE) flourished.

    This would explain why Roman helmets and other military equipment, were directly inspired by Alpine Celtic ones.

    The Romans became more technologically and culturally advanced than their northern cousins thanks to the influence of their Near-Eastern neighbours, the Etruscans (immediately north of Rome) and the Greeks (to the south). The Romans combined the best elements of Celtic and Greco-Etruscan culture and technology to become a superpower.

    The Celts were said to be fiercer warriors than the Greeks, who were themselves stronger than the Persians (they never let themselves conquered, even in the heyday of Darius and Xerxes). Even Alexander the Great feared the Alpine/Danubian Celts, and made sure to secure peace with them before setting off to conquer the Middle East. The Celts invaded Greece a few decades after Alexander's death, and sacked Delphi in 279 BCE. Those were the same Alpine Celts that had sacked Rome in 390 BCE, and besieged it again in 367 BCE.

    Until the 3rd century, the Alpine Celts were the strongest military power in Europe, and the fastest expanding culture. The La Tène culture spread well beyond Gaul and Italy, to Iberia, Britain, the Balkans and Anatolia.

    If the Romans were in fact close relatives of those Celts, equipped with the Greek advances in agriculture, ship-building, military strategy, and political structure, it is no wonder that they rose to proeminence.

    Roman relations with their Alpine Celtic cousins

    Many Eastern Gaulish tribes (e.g. Sequani. Aedui) allied themselves to Julius Caesar during the Conquest of Gaul. In fact they had long had good relations with Rome and were the ones who requested Caesar's assistance to fight other tribes. Before Caesar's time the Aedui had attached themselves to the Romans, and were honoured with the title of brothers and kinsmen of the Roman people. Perhaps it is no wonder that the Romans had the hardest time defeating the tribes closest to them, the Suebi and the Belgae.

    This also explains why the Romans called the Suebi and other Celts of modern south-west Germany the "Germani". The Latin Germani comes from germanus (from germen, "seed" or "offshoot"). The term was used to mean that they were the genuine Celts (descendants of the Hallstatt and La Tène Celts), as opposed to the other tribes of Gaul. Or it meant that they, Romans, descended from the same "seed" as these Germani from the Black Forest, or saw each others as offshoots of the same tribe.

    The Roman provinces of Germania match exactly the regions where R1b-S28 has the highest frequency, around modern Belgium nd the Netherlands (Germania Inferior), and around the Baden-Württemberg (Germania Superior).


    ---

    Celtic, Italic and Germanic people are all descended from the same R1b1b2 stock. They split north of the Alps.

    The Italic branch went south and mixed with the Terramare people who were I2a, G2a and E-V13. Northern Italians have more Indo-European Celto-Italic blood, while southern Italian have more indigenous blood (the highest being Sardinia, then Basilicata).

    The Germanic branch moved north and mixed with the indigenous I1 and I2b people, who had already mixed with R1a migrants from the Corded Ware (Battle Axe) culture. The new hybrid Germanic people retained the highest percentage of aboriginal haplogroup I.

    Celtic people split in several groups : the Brythonic went to Britain and Ireland, the Gaulish to France, the Iberian to Spain and Portugal, and the Alpine remained around Austria, Switzerland, southern Germany, Eastern France and Belgium. The Iberian and Gaulish groups mixed with I2b, I2a and E people, the Alpine with I2b and E, and the Brythonic just with I2b people.

    It is likely that the language of the aboriginal Europeans influenced the various Celtic, Italic and Germanic dialects. Germanic languages diverted the most from the original European R1b language because it assimilated a very large part of aborigines.

  2. #2
    Ἀπολλόδοτος Α΄ ὁ Σωτήρ's Avatar Yeah science!
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Άργος - Ἑλλάς
    Posts
    1,293

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Well, the reconstructed ancient proto Italic and proto Celtic languages were almost identical due to both descending from Proto Indo-European.
    Example, first part of Schleicher's fable - Avis akvāsas ka - in both languages:

    Proto Italic -

    Owis ekwoikwe.
    Owis, kwosjo wlānā ne est,
    ekwōs spekét,
    oinom grāwúm woxom wéxontem,
    oinomkwe megam φorom,
    oinomkwe xomonem ōku φerontem.

    Proto Celtic -

    Owis ekwoikwe.
    Owis, kwosjo wlanā ne est,
    ekwōs spekét,
    oinom barúm woxom wéxontam,
    oinomkwe megam borom,
    oinomkwe dxonjom āku berontam.

    Translation:

    A sheep that had no wool saw horses, one of them pulling a heavy wagon, one carrying a big load, and one carrying a man quickly.

    The Proto Germanic version is a bit more different.

    Example:

    Awiz exwazxwe.
    Awiz, hwas wulnō ne est,
    exwanz spexét,
    ainan karún wagan wéganðun,
    ainanxwe mekon baran,
    ainanxwe gúmanan āxu béranðun.
    "First get your facts straight, then distort them at your leisure." - Mark Twain

    οὐκ ἦν μὲν ἐγώ, νῦν δ' εἰμί· τότε δ' ούκ ἔσομαι, ούδέ μοι μελήσει

  3. #3

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Nowadays Lithuanian language : Avis [ A-vis ] <---- Sheep it is a lot of similarities due Indo-europien to a lot of languages i guess.

  4. #4
    delra's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warsaw, Poland
    Posts
    5,590

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    How much did it even matter back then, whether you were "Celt", "Roman" or "Greek". Nationalities were invented two thousand years later? Gods were many and copied over, languages very similar, there were no passports and no border control, no citizenships and such. How did people tell a Celt from others. Did they identify themselves at all as Celtic, Greek or whatever?
    Last edited by delra; December 18, 2015 at 05:45 PM.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Quote Originally Posted by delra View Post
    How much did it even matter back then, whether you were "Celt", "Roman" or "Greek". Nationalities were invented two thousand years later? Gods were many and copied over, languages very similar, there were no passports and no border control, no citizenships and such. How did people tell a Celt from others. Did they identify themselves at all as Celtic, Greek or whatever?
    Yes, they most certainly did. Citizenship and identity (not nationality or race - those are modern concepts) were absolutely critical to an individual and to a polity. Why else do you think citizenship was so jealously guarded, and many settled societies had two very distinct tiers of status, for the citizen and foreigner?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    So.... The notion of Romaioi Barbaroi, is technically valid. (Especially if you're a polis dwelling hellene...)

  7. #7

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    The study I read had a different conclusion than what is here posted. Genetically the Latins and Celts were related, indicating they may have had some common ancestors, but not so close as to be the same family. Certainly not so closely related that they were near indistinguishable from each other in appearance or in language. Gaulish languages were still the norm in many places of western Europe well into the late stages of the empire's life.
    Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri

  8. #8
    texoman81's Avatar Ducenarius
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    979

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    What we know for sure is that Italic and Celtic languages are in the Indo-European family. They share many characteristics that no other languages in the family share so there have long been theories that they constitute a separate branch in the IE family and descend from a common ancestor. However, not all experts agree on this. Some think the similarities are due to borrowing back and forth. Celtic and Italic languages were almost certainly not mutually intelligible. Sure a speaker of one might understand a word here or there but they would not understand most of what was being said. The only language Latin had a high degree of mutual intelligibility with was Faliscan. Something else to consider when thinking about a Italo-Celtic subfamily is that many think Lusitanian is either a Proto-Celtic language or an Italic language. I've always thought it was more likely that the similarity with Italic languages were due to the influence of Latin because the earliest example of Lusitanian writing come after they had long been under Rome. It could actually be an Italic language, could be Celtic/Proto-Celtic, or it could represent a third branch of the Italo-Celtic subfamily. Germanic was not part of this subfamily it is more similar to Baltic and Slavic languages.
    Regardless of genetic and linguistic relationships, the Romans were definitely culturally more similar to Etruscans and Greeks. They consulted Greek and Etruscan oracles. People of both ethnicities have always been found in Rome. Celts and Germans, on the other hand, were considered barbarians.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Quote Originally Posted by haereticum View Post
    So.... The notion of Romaioi Barbaroi, is technically valid. (Especially if you're a polis dwelling hellene...)
    They spoke bad Greek (if they spoke it at all), didn't exercise naked, sometimes wore trousers if it was cold. Romans were barbarians.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral Piett View Post
    The study I read had a different conclusion than what is here posted. Genetically the Latins and Celts were related, indicating they may have had some common ancestors, but not so close as to be the same family. Certainly not so closely related that they were near indistinguishable from each other in appearance or in language. Gaulish languages were still the norm in many places of western Europe well into the late stages of the empire's life.
    Could you source it please. The genes tree related here, in the last part of the first post, are from EU data base . Actually, when it comes to the R1b family and its subdividion, the position stated here is almost indiscutible.

    Culturally though, it is another matter. Afaik, the Greeks - with exception - thought the Romans as Barbarians. There are deep diferences beetween Roman and Greek thinking, represented by the distance beetween the western and eastern halves of the empire.
    Last edited by Lucio Domicio Aureliano; December 20, 2015 at 08:13 AM.

  11. #11
    Roma_Victrix's Avatar Call me Ishmael
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    15,250

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Quote Originally Posted by Apollodotos I Soter View Post
    Well, the reconstructed ancient proto Italic and proto Celtic languages were almost identical due to both descending from Proto Indo-European.
    Example, first part of Schleicher's fable - Avis akvāsas ka - in both languages:

    Proto Italic -

    Owis ekwoikwe.
    Owis, kwosjo wlānā ne est,
    ekwōs spekét,
    oinom grāwúm woxom wéxontem,
    oinomkwe megam φorom,
    oinomkwe xomonem ōku φerontem.

    Proto Celtic -

    Owis ekwoikwe.
    Owis, kwosjo wlanā ne est,
    ekwōs spekét,
    oinom barúm woxom wéxontam,
    oinomkwe megam borom,
    oinomkwe dxonjom āku berontam.

    Translation:

    A sheep that had no wool saw horses, one of them pulling a heavy wagon, one carrying a big load, and one carrying a man quickly.

    The Proto Germanic version is a bit more different.

    Example:

    Awiz exwazxwe.
    Awiz, hwas wulnō ne est,
    exwanz spexét,
    ainan karún wagan wéganðun,
    ainanxwe mekon baran,
    ainanxwe gúmanan āxu béranðun.
    Wow! That's awesome! I always knew they were all obviously stemming from the same ancient Indo-European root language, but I had no idea the proto versions of each language were so damn similar. Were the ancient Celtic languages at times and in specific circumstances mutually intelligible with Latin?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    They spoke bad Greek (if they spoke it at all), didn't exercise naked, sometimes wore trousers if it was cold. Romans were barbarians.
    Although it forms its own separate branch, the Greek language is yet another Indo-European language like the Germanic, Italic, and Celtic languages. There's no escaping the fact that, linguistically speaking, the Greek tongue was a distant cousin to that of Latin.

  12. #12
    Ἀπολλόδοτος Α΄ ὁ Σωτήρ's Avatar Yeah science!
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Άργος - Ἑλλάς
    Posts
    1,293

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Quote Originally Posted by Roma_Victrix View Post
    Wow! That's awesome! I always knew they were all obviously stemming from the same ancient Indo-European root language, but I had no idea the proto versions of each language were so damn similar. Were the ancient Celtic languages at times and in specific circumstances mutually intelligible with Latin?
    Faliscan is the only true mutually intelligible language to Latin due to belonging to same group that descends from single Italic language. Speakers of Latin can understand Oscan and Umbrian with considerable difficulty, while they can understand Faliscan with some difficulty, given the fact that Latin and Faliscan descend from the same Latino-Faliscan group while Oscan and Umbrian descend from Osco-Umbrian group.
    There are simply too many changes that went from Italic to early Latin and the same goes for Celtic and ie. Lepontic (the one spoken in the western Alps) for them to be mutually intelligible.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roma_Victrix View Post
    Although it forms its own separate branch, the Greek language is yet another Indo-European language like the Germanic, Italic, and Celtic languages. There's no escaping the fact that, linguistically speaking, the Greek tongue was a distant cousin to that of Latin.
    Some ancient Roman authors have noticed similarities between the two languages, they failed to see similarities with Gallic. The thing with similarities between languages that share a common ancestor is that languages tend to change a lot with time and by doing so they become more and more distant.
    Greek is a conservative language which didn't manage to change enough in the past 2000 years to become unintelligible to modern day speakers, the same goes for Persian for example.
    Latin, on the other hand, is unintelligible to modern day speakers of Romance languages, the same goes for all Celtic languages.

    As a bonus - First part of Schleicher's fable in Proto Greek:

    Owis ekwoikwe.
    Ówis, kwohjo wlānā ne ēst,
    ekwons spekét,
    oiwom kwarúm wokhom wekhontm̥,
    oiwomkwe megām phorom,
    oiwomkwe khthómonm̥ ōku phérontm̥.
    Last edited by Ἀπολλόδοτος Α΄ ὁ Σω December 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM.

  13. #13
    Roma_Victrix's Avatar Call me Ishmael
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    15,250

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine Celtic

    Quote Originally Posted by Apollodotos I Soter View Post
    As a bonus - First part of Schleicher's fable in Proto Greek:

    Owis ekwoikwe.
    Ówis, kwohjo wlānā ne ēst,
    ekwons spekét,
    oiwom kwarúm wokhom wekhontm̥,
    oiwomkwe megām phorom,
    oiwomkwe khthómonm̥ ōku phérontm̥.
    Every one of these is so damned similar!

    Also, thanks for answering my question about mutual intelligibility.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •