The Hunnic faction leader....

**Aw Vincent** · March 15, 2015, 04:15 PM

Have you noticed that when you select the Huns in the Campaign Panel it is shown Attila and not Uldin, the faction leader in 395 ? I can't understand why CA did this....

**Barbarian Nobility** · March 15, 2015, 04:44 PM

Because videogame?

**The Chocolate Jesus** · March 15, 2015, 04:54 PM

Because Attila is more important than Uldin. That's why.

**Lugotorix** · March 15, 2015, 07:14 PM

Pretty self explanatory. All of the nomadic kings use the same crown. Why not use the unique model they created for Attila so you can get a good look at him in game.

**Aeratus** · March 15, 2015, 07:17 PM

Probably because the title of the game is "Attila"?

**RexJayden** · March 16, 2015, 01:24 AM

This is Attila in my Geats campaign. He looks "different".

Click image for larger version.

Name: 20150315_171823.jpg
Views: 96
Size: 1.02 MB
ID: 322904

**kanzy** · March 16, 2015, 05:33 AM

Originally Posted by RexJayden

This is Attila in my Geats campaign. He looks "different".

I guess everyone looks like a sissy to Vikings

**Keyser** · March 16, 2015, 05:49 AM

Got the same bug and i was playing the huns. Attila was Attila until he became king, then he had the appearance of a roman.

**Aw Vincent** · March 16, 2015, 08:47 AM

Every faction in TW Attila has the faction leader of 395 AD, only the Huns have Attila. Of course the game is called "Total War Attila", but it has no sense putting him as the faction leader in 395 AD (at least the image)

**General Maximus** · March 16, 2015, 05:21 PM

Since they brought back the feature from Shogun II where, as in real Japan, a Samurai's armour is passed off to his successor, who then takes on mostly the same looks, I guess they forgot to change the system for Attila.

That or they just wanted Attila to be there. 'Cuz title, 'cuz the derp kids (their target audience now) will love it and think it is awesome.