Army stance test - it works until now.

[ragnar23]

(poor english sorry)
the forced march is well known issue. DEI disabled it.
But i'v tried. even though I'm noob

First
I assumed none stance as battle deployed or camped
I've made only none stance can attack (raid stance can do it too)
and reduce move range -55
So Army only can attack very near ZOC
and give force marce +100 line of sight.
force marce +40 move range

result; no suprise attack.
AI response threat better
since They see it and use force march effectively. AI forced march are not ambushed. (untill now)
side effect- They move far by using forced march in transport
winter. not gonna battle.

If interested, I've upload it

[geala]

Where do you see the advantages of your change? As I practically never played R2TW vanilla I'm not used to forced march.

[ragnar23]

if army that stance forced march attacked 100% ambushed. player can manage, but AI can't. somtimes you need force march when you stuck in ZOC. and without it transport are a lot slow. So i try not be ambushed (for AI) and I assumed forced march as normal march assumed normal default stance as battle deploy or camped

Most of all AI response enemy threat better.

[ragnar23]

Situation
Macedonia Epirus Vs Athens Sparta
With Vanilla or Default Dei This kind of army arrangement not really happen.

[Butan]

Nice alternative.

[ragnar23]

Butan / Thank you.

I'v found that i need to enable navy double time too, but DEI disable it. How to enable Double time?

[rjacko10]

Interesting. Similar to the increased range spotting recently developed for the BAI.

[FlashHeart07]

How is that arrangement of armies not possible in DeI?
To bad that we cannot have a 5th army stance.

[Butan]

If we could have unlimited stance....