Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    Hi everyone
    I would like to have your opinion on 2 submod: FAST BATTLE 2.0 AND KAM'S PACK ( [EXPERIMENTALE]...To see forum)

    I did the test and here are the results and I'll post each submod the number of kill, the number of deaths on my side, time battles, and if I won or lost.
    On tests, I took exactly the same units for both sides with exactly the same deployment and trying to make the most of frontal. Its only infantry.

    K = Kills; L = Loses; w = Win

    SUBMOD FAST BATTLE 2.0:

    1- 931 K; 483 L; 16 min; W

    2- 925 K; 836 L; 23.25 min; L

    3- 952 K; 805 L; 27.28 min; L

    4- 846 K; 747 L; 21.31 min; L

    KAM'S PACK:

    1- 927 k. 319 L; 12 min; W

    2- 900K; 435 L; 13.15 min; W

    3- 817 K; 503 L; 14.20 min; W

    4- 916 K; 408 L; 13.14 min; W


    In view of the results, note that I have more difficulties with the fast battle 2.0 while fighting be longer.
    I also noticed that the flanks attacks were deadliest and moral fall faster (flank attack) with the KAM'S submod

    Now I would like to have your opinion to know that gives the most challenge, if you could test them.
    For now, I'm leaning on the fast battle 2.0.
    Last edited by Farrell; February 03, 2015 at 12:54 PM.

  2. #2

    Default Re: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    Were you playing as Rome?

  3. #3

    Default Re: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    No

    My compo : 1 evocati, 1 eagle legio, 1 cohord legio, 1 pretorian, 1 armor legio (cil....) and 1 swordmen Auxiliaries (weakest of them)

    ennemi (Spain): 2 Ambacti, 1 Eiras, 4 scutaris.

  4. #4

    Default Re: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    You weren't Rome, but your army was composed entirely of units you can only recruit as Rome?

    I'm confused.

  5. #5

    Default Re: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    Sry my English is poor^^

    I wanna say I have not played Rome vs Rome.

    Others tests:

    Rome Vs macedoine

    Rome= 4 cohords legio, 1 armor legio, 1 evocati, 1 pretorian
    Macedoine: 2 phalanges thorakitai, 2 epibatoi, 1 thorak swordmen, 1 legionari swordmem, 1 hoplitai, 1 basilikoi peltast ( royal peltast)

    SUBMOD FAST BATTLE 2.0:

    939 K; 462 L; 22.41 min; W

    KAM'S PACK:

    908 k, 327 L, 16 min, W

    Maybe if I have less trouble with the KAM'S PACK it's because I win faster against weaker units and i can quickly flank ...

    We should try with bigger battles with compositions that resemble what can be found in the campaign...
    Last edited by Farrell; February 03, 2015 at 03:34 PM.

  6. #6
    MagicCuboid's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    688

    Default Re: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    The point of KAM's pack is to make it more difficult to flank the AI with cav. He also buffs archers/skirmishers, which has a counter-flank effect. I'd suggest testing battles with a fully balanced army as you're really only testing 1/3 of the balance
    "I've snapped and plotted all my life. There's no other way to be alive, king, and fifty all at once." - Henry II, The Lion in Winter

  7. #7

    Default Re: DEBATE BAI friendly battles - 30.01.2015 VS FAST BATTLE 2.0

    Yes I will do tests with balanced compo and I would come post the resultsThe others, also gave your opinion on these two submod if you could test them

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •