Hello guys, as the releasing date gets closer, things look much better in Attila Total War. However I've detected many ridiculous mistakes that should not exist in such a game. I (want to believe) that CA is working with professional advisers for the designing team. But it looks like some the desings in the games are too superficial like the clothing and armours for Sassanids suck. There was even a type of cavalry which the riders are wearing Saudi Arabian headwear.
Actually I have already seen many topics that some fans shared the inaccuracies that they have detected. But I see there is no one debating about the clothing of Huns. I'm really not satisfied with the armor stuff that Attila wears, looks totally inaccurate and moreover it doesn't fit to a ruler coz it looks very cheap.
Other than the armor and clothing, I've noticed that the sword that Attila is carrying looks like bronze age swords of Celts or some bronze age swords from Manchuria and Korea which someone basically can not use at 4th or 5th centuries. And it's too short in lenght for that age as well.
Sword from ancient Korean Mahan Confederacy (probably 1st century AD)
Swords from Korean Puyo State in Manchuria (1st or 2nd century AD)
I think the Hunnic swords of that era would resemlbe Germanic swords since they were under Germanic influence and probably they would combine it with their own mastery. In addition, they might have used ring pommeled swords. This kind of sword was used by Sarmatians before the arrival of Huns as well and it is a very hot debate that what is the root of these ring shaped pommels coz early Chinese have used it as well. After the disappearance of the people called Sarmatians from the history of steppe, ring-pommeled swords stayed in use over a very vast territory from Iran to China, up to the 8th century...
Sarmatian ring pommeld swords:
Chinese Han Dynasty swords:
![]()











Reply With Quote








