Day 1 Blood & Gore DLC?

[Lord Shadowscar]

I shall be frank.

The Blood & Gore DLC from Rome II has spoiled me.

So will you kindly kill the suspense and give us a release day Blood and Gore DLC for Attila?

Or... just let us move our Rome II one over?

[Lionheart11]

I agree it needs to be day one , we paid for R2 and this is just R2 2.0 so let Rome 2 owners have it without paying again.

[crucify_ego]

I'd be cool with 1 dollar.

[ShadowMassa]

Blood & Gore has been an extra purchasable component since Shogun 2. Agreed, they need to release that as soon as possible. 'I'll buy that for a dollar.'

[Fredrin]

50p for us Brits please, CA Or whatever a dollar converts to so the Robocop reference stays in tact!

[Humble Warrior]

50p for us Brits please, CA Or whatever a dollar converts to so the Robocop reference stays in tact!

Yea, let`s all encourage terrible business practises.

And good luck getting it for 50p as prices have been steadily increasing by £1 with each Blood DLC. So £3 is my guess.

Heck you don`t even get options like small, medium or heavy gore that modders in other games give for free.

[Fredrin]

Yea, let`s all encourage terrible business practises.

And good luck getting it for 50p as prices have been steadily increasing by £1 with each Blood DLC. So £3 is my guess.

Heck you don`t even get options like small, medium or heavy gore that modders in other games give for free.

I know, it's shameful practice. Devilishly resourceful that they've actually cooked up a way of making money out of an age certification, but that's the sitch as it stands. How refreshing a drop in price would be considering they'll barely have to lift a finger to patch it over from R2 to Attila...

[jtfjtfjtf]

They should make it free. Extra bloody, extra gorey.

[Karnil Vark Khaitan]

it should be free if you own it in rome 2

[Roboute Guilliman]

It should be, especially since it will be the same one from Rome2.

[Butan]

It should be, especially since it will be the same one from Rome2.

Exactly... they just have to copy/paste the effect tables to Attila... If it could have been argued that "it cost development time" with Rome 2, since Attila shares engine and all, it would be a massive rip-off even at 1 rubble.

[stevehoos]

Exactly... they just have to copy/paste the effect tables to Attila... If it could have been argued that "it cost development time" with Rome 2, since Attila shares engine and all, it would be a massive rip-off even at 1 rubble.

Well that's all they do with their DLC, so why not fleece the sheep some more.

I remember well the old options for Crimson Tide.

[DeliCiousTZM]

It needs to be a DLC that is purchasable not for the development cost, but so it doesn't effect the age rating.

P.S Butan, nice Strawman! Ignore for life, enjoy.

[Lionheart11]

It needs to be a DLC that is purchasable not for the development cost, but so it doesn't effect the age rating.

Technically you are right but it's not about the blood, its about the decapitations and limbs coming off, that changes the age rating more than blood stains.

[douglas]

Mus understanding is that they have to have some kind of control due to the age rating and various country requirements to sell the game. Germany comes to mind as one that is fairly strict on what can be sold for a particular age rating. There are others.

Were it not for the differing laws they have to deal with I believe it would not be a point for discussion on threads like this.

[crucify_ego]

Jeez! People are way too entitled these days.

[Achilles Lacedaemon]

Dont you realise that Attila is called a "New Total War Title" instead of some kind of expansion or DLC (which is what the game is), just because then they can sell DLC for it.

[Butan]

I think its more because of my sig


For the sake of arguing, possibly with other people:

It needs to be a DLC that is purchasable not for the development cost, but so it doesn't effect the age rating.

If it was just for the rating it could be a free-LC. I wont mind if its a free-LC, the only problem with the recent CA tradition of putting blood effects in an option is that its a paid option.

[GoTW Kubee]

I think its more because of my sig


For the sake of arguing, possibly with other people:


If it was just for the rating it could be a free-LC. I wont mind if its a free-LC, the only problem with the recent CA tradition of putting blood effects in an option is that its a paid option.

Or, at the very least, they could just charge 1p for it rather than £1.99.

[Achilles Lacedaemon]

If it was just for the rating it could be a free-LC. I wont mind if its a free-LC, the only problem with the recent CA tradition of putting blood effects in an option is that its a paid option.

wasnt like that with medieval