I will answer all PMs tomorrow afternoon. Thanks for your consideration!![]()
I will answer all PMs tomorrow afternoon. Thanks for your consideration!![]()
Are rules open for discussion before starting?
I have the feeling that destroying buildings is really cheap and unbalances a game that is well arranged.
Anyone else wants to forbid destroying buildings at all?
Well I'm okay with that, I doubt I would have destroyed everything anyway, not that hardcore :p
Remember to PM about turns fellas. Can't wait to start!
May the players express their opinions as to whether or not the destruction of buildings should be allowed
I think it should be allowed simply because it makes the game more "interesting" sometimes destroying relatively "useless" buildings gives you just enough gold to afford that one fort that will slow the enemy army down and give you that one extra turn that makes all the diference.
That is my opinion and realy i am okay with it either way but personaly i would keep it
-Legless Lannes
I think it should just be left up to the players' judgement, I'm fine either way.
I agree with Rudra, destroying a pretty useless building can help a lot
Well, can we then forbid also to destroy Smiths and Ports? Those will never fall under the category of "usless builings".
Ports i am okay they are definetly not useless. Smiths however i would say are expendable i mean sure they can improve your troops but they are only really important to have in the main recruitment hubs ( e.g Harenhall and Riverun for Tully) all the other Smiths in the other settlemest are not really that important (personal opinion) i mean i would gladly sacrifice one or two smiths in some minor settlements for the ability to fort off a bridge for example and thus attain victory in a specific situation( but that is just my opinion)
-Legless Lannes
Any chance of starting this?![]()
Sorry for delays, been having issues with my game.
Let us begin, Lannister turn 1 - http://www.mediafire.com/download/cp...r_1%282%29.sav
YES! Good luck all!
One turn peace will be in place. It has been highlighted that it may be required in this submod.
Last edited by Diablo del Sur; January 09, 2015 at 11:29 AM.
Tully has not been online since 4th January ?
This poor little thing is getting rather dusty.
Canīt Stark sub untill either Tully returns or a new player is found?
Otherwise this will never start.![]()
-Legless Lannes
I can be your new Tully if you'd like, though I think I should be handicapped somehow.
I would like to play this HS As fast as we canso Rivers would be a good alternative considering the original Tully has not been on for nearly a week.
This poor little thing is getting rather dusty.