Better Aggresive CAI for Rome 2 V 3.5 Official Release - Patch 17

[♔Greek Strategos♔]

I think the Hard version makes other factions less loyal or something like that. He's planning an update, but that shouldn't stop you from starting up a campaign in the meantime.

The AI recruitment bug is gone with the current edition, so it's nice and stable.

Thanks mate...
I'm using version 2.6 Hard CAI only with DEI 1.04a and having 13 conflicts though...
2.5 supposed to have only 1...

I'm using also Slower Grand Campaign submod for DEI which gives me one conflict with 2.6.

So what difficulty is suggested for my setup???

[ShellShok]

I personally played on VH/H . It's depends, wich faction you take.However,everydoby scary me when i reach 3/4 lvl.Btw, for harder battle i'll use this

[ShellShok]

About these conflicts, Jenaidi said it's normal.Im also played with Slower Grand Campaign , and did't see any CTD.

[♔Greek Strategos♔]

About these conflicts, Jenaidi said it's normal.Im also played with Slower Grand Campaign , and did't see any CTD.

I personally played on VH/H . It's depends, wich faction you take.However,everydoby scary me when i reach 3/4 lvl.Btw, for harder battle i'll use this

I see...
Thanks mate

[Telenil]

i also enabled you to gain imperium level exp through important battle, if you win lots of battle, its will fill the exp, if you lose the battle, then you may lose the exp.

I'm not sure gaining Imperium through battles would work. If the AI has ressources bonuses and can make more armies, you can win many battles and be at the exact same place. The number of territories is fixed, so you don't have any Imperium "created" over the course of the game.

[Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]

Heroic or decesive victory probably, last time i check, its to counter the problem where player dont want increase the size of their imperium throught occupy land, you know play turtling behind your ally, then support it, but never take teritory.But the exp not as significant then gaining real land itself, if you got decesive defeat the imperium gain can become minus too

The good news the main work is done, i hope i can finish working the AIO, DeI, and Radious version today

[ToonTotalWar]

Heroic or decesive victory probably, last time i check, its to counter the problem where player dont want increase the size of their imperium throught occupy land, you know play turtling behind your ally, then support it, but never take teritory.But the exp not as significant then gaining real land itself, if you got decesive defeat the imperium gain can become minus too

The good news the main work is done, i hope i can finish working the AIO, DeI, and Radious version today

Sounds great mate +reps

[ShellShok]

Heroic or decesive victory probably, last time i check, its to counter the problem where player dont want increase the size of their imperium throught occupy land, you know play turtling behind your ally, then support it, but never take teritory.But the exp not as significant then gaining real land itself, if you got decesive defeat the imperium gain can become minus too

The good news the main work is done, i hope i can finish working the AIO, DeI, and Radious version today

Sounds very debatable."Exp from battles" may spoil gameplay.It depends on many factors: which bonuses gives emperum lvl for AI and Players, which battle need win/lose.....need testing.
In DeI section once you said

[/URL]Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]Its not DeI submod and its will never be

so if that not secret, why?

[Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]

Sounds very debatable."Exp from battles" may spoil gameplay.It depends on many factors: which bonuses gives emperum lvl for AI and Players, which battle need win/lose.....need testing.

Dont worry the gain is only you able score heroic victory or heroic defeat in battle, and the gain last time i check its very small compare with capture real province, but in case things go wrong i can revert it back or tweak the imperium level meter. So you are more longer to attain imperium for next level.

Like i said, being submod one will submit his work to another mod, that why its called sub, its never entirely became his own mod because he need follow some certain rule , Basicly its up to me should i support or not the other mod version. Also i am bit independent modder

[Master Jedi]

Hey man (and I mean mod creator). Is it possible to reinforce the garrisons to every faction?
It's just that In "Wrath of Sparta" Athens constantly get's it's ass kicked by Corinth and in Rome Grand campaign smaller factions are annihilated pretty quickly by a larger one's

[GourmetGorilla]

You should try DEI, it reworks garrisons.

[Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]

Better Aggresive CAI for Rome 2 V 2.7 Grand Closing Edition, now released, bon appetit everyone

Time to finish the Attila version now

[SharpEyed]

Better Aggresive CAI for Rome 2 V 2.7 Grand Closing Edition, now released, bon appetit everyone


Time to finish the Attila version now

Gz and Ty Sir

casual meaning middle hard something btw?

[Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]

Something like that

[ToonTotalWar]

Junaidi - why is kv_rules table inserted in your mod? this will effect my AIO settings as I use this table? is this needed in your mod?

I believe that this table is only for BAI alterations, so why use in this mod?

[Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]

Simple is i just use your kv tables,in order to trick the mod manager, since i learn that some table cant be replaced, unless its start with same name, basicly the last version you got get many feature not active since there is conflict in mod manager, and the only way you able sync it by use the same table, for example A table will replace A table, the content itself is AIO kv tables so all value remain intact, just the value that i need to be replaced that i change.It will not caused crash or anything already tested myself. Hope its clarify everything

[ToonTotalWar]

Simple is i just use your kv tables,in order to trick the mod manager, since i learn that some table cant be replaced, unless its start with same name, basicly the last version you got get many feature not active since there is conflict in mod manager, and the only way you able sync it by use the same table, for example A table will replace A table, the content itself is AIO kv tables so all value remain intact, just the value that i need to be replaced that i change.It will not caused crash or anything already tested myself. Hope its clarify everything

hmm....well I just checked your version of this table and these are changes that I have found:

melee_hit_chance_base 80 (AIO this is 43)

This change in stat are crucial to faster battles in game and with these changes in your mod it will change the battle lengths in my mod as your mod loads first.

it would be safer that we are both using the same stats for this table for stability reasons. which version of mod have you used this table from? as it seems to be a much earlier version of AIO?

[SharpEyed]

nvm

[Junaidi83 de Bodemloze]

reserved

[ToonTotalWar]

Bran mc born will do well, that sub mod do right ?

Eh??? Bran Mac Born sub mods have nothing to do with the kv_rules table that your using in the AIO version of your mod? All I request is that we change that one entry so that both mods are compatible? Do you not agree?