New TW title set to be announced on the 24th-28th september!!!

[RogueLeader]

I say Warhammer I dont think they want to continue on with the Rome 2 bashing with an expansion. Enough bad press they need to move on and not drag out this misery. Was Nappy well recieved after Empire (not really) number of sales from what I remember.

[Cyrene]

most likely it's a Rome II expansion

[GussieFinkNottle]

OK, we know not to pre-order this time, wait for the reviews and patches, right guys? (in full knowledge that a wave of people will pre-order anyway)

[riskymonk]

Pretty sure it's total war arena however with rome 2s barebones, unstable (many times broken), unbalanced and constant re balancing of multiplayer I don't think arena is gonna generate much interest pre release.

[Hoplite of Ilis]

I'd rather see them present a descent game developing policy first!

[stupar123]

I pray for Medieval III, and if they screw the AI, political system,generate more irrevelant events, create more non-realistic snake pot, cow pot, lion pot catapults....... I'll never look into CA for entertainment again!

[Vardano]

I dont care much about what game it's going to be (no pre-order of course) but they better not abandoning Rome II. It's still needs to be patched (CAI especially) a lot and needs some new content to be added to a game to become a solid title, I'm not hyped for ED, even it's a good step, or just give those advanced modding tools to moders.

[Toho]

95% sure it will be barbarian invasion 2.

[AnthoniusII]

Lets see the facts:
I thought that I heard that CA had some kind of co-operation with another company for a future game.
If that is true then warhammer is most likely.
Warhammer has a huge advandage for CA ..It needs no historical ballance like the games it created so far and so failed to add in Rome II.

KLA said something about a short of a major expansion like BI ...
Facts :
CA wishes to take more money from it customers and a DLC based tp BI would be very "cheap"..So under the title of a new "release" customers will forced to spend new 40-50 euros or dollars.
Medieval III
Facts: Same as above. But in this case CA would need much more work (settlements and diferent scripts).
Both last cases have a huge advandage for CA.
Much of the material needed for both has already developed for Rome II.
Horses, animations, basic models, map....etc...
That is a good start for a furure development.

I strongly believe that the last major Rome II DLC will be some kind of BI.

So the 1st and 3rd options may be more likely t happen if we remember that CA releases a announced game after 2 years and more!

[Evan MF]

Well it's coming way too soon for a new engine to have been used so god help Total War fans.

[Humble Warrior]

Well it's coming way too soon for a new engine to have been used so god help Total War fans.

They've shown how they've taken a bad engine and are willing to force it to work, no matter how busted it is - and they have to some extent. For sake of quicker cash, I'm pretty sure they won't drop it.

[Bucle_CT]

Well, this is a job offer in CA website that was filled time ago :

http://www.creative-assembly.com/job...ucer-warhammer

Though it doesn't makes any mention to a Total War : Warhammer tittle it specifies that what is needed in the candidate is a deep experience in the Warhammer Fantasy battle mechanics. Why would CA want to hire an expert in Warhammer battle mechanics if they wouldn' be planning to do a Total WAr -like Warmmer tittle?.

My bet and hopes go for a future Total War : Warhammer. If not the one-to-be-announced in late september, eventually I hope it will come.

[Mabzie55]

Oh, and if it's Warhammer: Total War -- I will firstly not buy it.
Secondly be very pissed and declare CA completely dead.
Thirdly, probably never buy another TW game.

I play TW because of the historical settings, not for some fantasy BS... and I;m honestly appalled people actually want that.

[Magni]

Oh, and if it's Warhammer: Total War -- I will firstly not buy it.
Secondly be very pissed and declare CA completely dead.
Thirdly, probably never buy another TW game.

I play TW because of the historical settings, not for some fantasy BS... and I;m honestly appalled people actually want that.

Yes, how dare people like or would want to play fun videogames. Don't they know that fun is doubleplusungood and should never be allowed? What is wrong with people?

I for one would be positively thrilled with a TW-style game set in the WHFB setting; it's perfectly suited to the format and has the potential to be fun as hell, as already shown to quite a degree by Call of Warhammer.

[Mabzie55]

Yes, how dare people like or would want to play fun videogames. Don't they know that fun is doubleplusungood and should never be allowed? What is wrong with people?

I for one would be positively thrilled with a TW-style game set in the WHFB setting; it's perfectly suited to the format and has the potential to be fun as hell, as already shown to quite a degree by Call of Warhammer.

Yeah... screw that.

The best part of TW is playing factions that actually existed and changing the course of history.
You want to play warhammer? Cool, play warhammer.

But when I say I would never buy a W:TW, I think I'm speaking for a good number of TW fans as well.

The historical setting is what makes these games, and without that it seems like it would be the opposite of "fun".

[Magni]

Yeah... screw that.

The best part of TW is playing factions that actually existed and changing the course of history.
You want to play warhammer? Cool, play warhammer.

But when I say I would never buy a W:TW, I think I'm speaking for a good number of TW fans as well.

The historical setting is what makes these games, and without that it seems like it would be the opposite of "fun".

So, in other words, you just hate the very idea that people could have fun in ways not specifically approved by you.

Well, hopefully CA will do the smart thing and never, ever listen to you. "Fans" like you are pure poison to any franchise.

[Bethencourt]

Medieval 3 no, no with these sieges.

Torches in warhammer, I do not know warhammer, but maybe it works there.

[Orkfaeller]

Medieval 3 no, no with this sieges.

Torches in warhammer, I do not know warhammer, but maybe it works there.

I'm a Warhammer fan and I take offense to that.
In WHFB you use, well, siege engines.

[TheRomanRuler]

I'm a Warhammer fan and I take offense to that.
In WHFB you use, well, siege engines.

This is more realistic than Rome 2 sieges. it seems Warhammer Total War would be more realistic than Rome 2 TW...

[Zipzopdippidybopbop]

So soon? Enjoy your rushed game lads.*

*Now with 200% extra budget for marketing purposes!