Yes, it is fair.
No, it is not fair.
Kind of: View the settlement
Not going to read every post in this thread but yes of course it's fair to compare unmodded TWR2 with modded RTW. Those RTW mods have been around and in a state of continuous improvement for years and offered plenty for CA to draw upon to improve its follow up iteration of Rome Total War. Instead, they went in an entirely different direction, which isn't in itself such a bad notion...but the vision...and the execution. My oh my.![]()
Last edited by Philadelphos; July 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM.
Creator ofRome Total History
Rome 2 sucks, EB, RS and RTR were yesterday...
Don't you feel like it's time to move on?
Explore the ancient world, fight epic battles,
conquer beautiful queens and princesses...
Try a new groundbreaking mod:
Experience Rome Total History!
Play RTHor wait for Rome 3!
Am i missing something here but wouldnt u either play a modded Rome1 and a modded Rome2?
As vanilla total wars have always been pretty bland?![]()
I actually really like playing R2 unmodded. Modding just hasn't been the same for me since CA started using Warscape. The kind of things that I would like to see changed/redone in R2 are hardcoded so there's no point....
Under the Patronage of PikeStance
Is it fair to compare the graphism/animations/technology of a 10 years old game and a recent game ?..
A lot of players say rome 2 is better than rome 2 because of the graphism and the animations. So ....
Is it fair to compare the graphism/animations/technologies of a 10 years old game and a recent game ?... mmmh ?
so no "rome 2 have better graphism than rome 1" too, no "rome 2 have better animations than rome 1" too ect... because 'hey man ! it is not fair".
![]()
with the arguments used in this thread, we can say it is not "fair" too. They said it is not fair because rome 1 is a lot more older than rome 2 so rome 1 have more mods/patchs so you can not talk about the mods/patchs in your comaprison. So it is not fair too compare graphisms and animations too because rome 1 is a lot more older than rome 2. It is excatly the same argument.
If we begin to talk about what is fair or not, I think we should talk about EVERY unfair comparisons, even the one used by the fans of rome 2 for example ....
But IMHO, it seems it is more another try to defend a specific game than to really discuss about how to compare two games from two different generations . If we listen some users here, we have to wait for the very last patch of rome 2 before to compare vanilla rome 1 and vanilla rome 2 ... except if you think rome 2 is better than rome 1 , if you think that, you can begin to compare them right now of course .... but if you think rome 1 is better , hey man ! it is not fair, rome 1 have more patchs !![]()
Last edited by baptistus; July 15, 2014 at 09:05 PM.
Indeed. Funny how some people don't have any problems to compare R2 to RTW modded or not as long as the comparison is to R2 advantage.
Totalheaddache made a valid point in that modded or not RTW and R2 belong to the same game category. In fact they both belong to the same specific sub-category of turn-based campaign map with real time battles. So it is perfectly fine to compare the character development in RTW mods with R2 as both work in the same environment.
p.s voted yes you can compare any game to any other game although you have to stipulate your reasons.
e.g i can compare fifa10 to fifa14 etc etc...or even say bf4 to call of duty or dayz to left for dead or dragon age inquisition to demon souls 2...you catch my drift.
so in my book a silly pointless thread op.
/end of
i.e what the hell has fairness got to do with anything they are both games of a similar genre of which i can say what i like about either. as long as it's based on fact and not blown out of my xxxx...?
"but its not fair people dont like the game"
tough luck it is. deal with it!
Last edited by Totalheadache; July 14, 2014 at 12:20 PM.
Comparing a modded Rome I to vanilla Rome II is like comparing a re-worked/enhanced 2004 model Volkswagen Golf to a 2013 model Volkswagen Golf.
Looks like a lot of people who voted yes don't get the difference.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
You could put 1884 there and it wouldn't make it fair.
Though you clearly don't have much of an idea on how fast car industry is advancing.
Ummm, no. I did say re-worked/enhanced, did I not? You don't see anyone in the car industry comparing an older version of a car that passed through a car shop with the latest version. Nowhere do you compare a custom modded old version of a product with an unmodded new version.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
I was suggesting that your comparison of comparing RTW1 to RTW2 is like comparing a 2004 model Volkswagen Golf ( enhanced ) to a 2013 model Volkswagen Golf is in itself a comparison between two types of comparisons.
You just cannot stop people making comparisons even between a PC game and a car so I see no reason to think that its unfair to make a comparison between two games at least you cant drive off in one of them.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
I don't think it's fair to compare Rome 2 with modded Rome 1, however even Rome 2 compared to vanilla Rome 1. Rome 2 still sucks
Not saying Rome 1 is better, but at some points it is. And i just expected Rome 2 to be better, it's designed so badly alot of the core mechanics don't work or maky any sence.