Thread: 'Star Wars' discussions

  1. #5001

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Instinct, in this case, taps into the Force.

    Releasing passion is both force multiplier and instant power boost.

    Dooku's might be more controlled, being fed by anger and disillusionment.
    Eats, shoots, and leaves.

  2. #5002
    Mayer's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Permanent Lockdown
    Posts
    2,339

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Is the mechanics of force really that important? Mysticism on Earth has also its fair share of contradictions.
    I know one thing, it was established in the OT to be controllable by old masters and Jedi needed training, although some had innate attraction to the force like Skywalker.
    Vader still beat Luke effortlessly in EpV
    It doesn't make sense in the established universe that a noone like MaRey Sue can instantly beat dark jedi/Sith.
    HATE SPEECH ISN'T REAL

  3. #5003
    Lord Oda Nobunaga's Avatar 大信皇帝
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Azuchi-jō Tenshu
    Posts
    23,463

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Quote Originally Posted by Mayer View Post
    Is the mechanics of force really that important? Mysticism on Earth has also its fair share of contradictions.
    I know one thing, it was established in the OT to be controllable by old masters and Jedi needed training, although some had innate attraction to the force like Skywalker.
    Vader still beat Luke effortlessly in EpV
    It doesn't make sense in the established universe that a noone like MaRey Sue can instantly beat dark jedi/Sith.
    I would be happy to keep it vague and unanswered but George and Disney keep wanting to answer it in the stupidest ways imaginable.
    In this case it matters because it is the ultimate truth of the Star Wars Universe.

    The actual mechanics could be done better. If you read the Expanded Universe material or played some of the games they don't put nearly as many limitations on how to use the Force. They also use the Force in smarter ways than in many of the films. The Prequels seem to have limited the Force entirely to jumping, Force Push (TM) and Force Choke (TM). Then a really strong bad guy gets to shoot Force Lightning (TM). Also a few general things like telekinesis, prophetic visions and mind reading. But there ought to be all sorts of other powers, in the Expanded Universe there are a few. The physics in Clone Wars and Rebels were really bad, the whole thing felt artificial. Logically a robot who has 4 arms and bird legs, as well as being completely made of metal, would be really strong but instead he was a complete pushover.
    Last edited by Lord Oda Nobunaga; February 22, 2019 at 11:58 AM.

    "Famous general without peer in any age, most superior in valor and inspired by the Way of Heaven; since the provinces are now subject to your will it is certain that you will increasingly mount in victory." - Ōgimachi-tennō

  4. #5004

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    What do you mean few? There are a lot of esoteric Force powers in the EU. Sith Alchemy, Sith mind tricks, Jedi smithing, healing, projection, stealth, etc...

  5. #5005
    Lord Oda Nobunaga's Avatar 大信皇帝
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Azuchi-jō Tenshu
    Posts
    23,463

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    There are a few, it varies by material. There should be a lot more powers. Even if just to be applied in combat.

    "Famous general without peer in any age, most superior in valor and inspired by the Way of Heaven; since the provinces are now subject to your will it is certain that you will increasingly mount in victory." - Ōgimachi-tennō

  6. #5006

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions



    Jedi force building.
    Eats, shoots, and leaves.

  7. #5007
    HannibalExMachina's Avatar Just a sausage
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    11,244

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Quote Originally Posted by Condottiere 40K View Post
    Instinct, in this case, taps into the Force.

    Releasing passion is both force multiplier and instant power boost.

    Dooku's might be more controlled, being fed by anger and disillusionment.
    well, thats only a bad thing if they are expressions of negative emotions, right? does it work with all emotions? codifying emotions is a problem in itself, and it seems the jedi idea is that all passions are bad, which is oc humbug.

    why is dooku more in control tho, i dont get that part.

  8. #5008
    Wallachian's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    9,778

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Does anyone here feel like they have wasted years of their life reading Expanded Universe Star Wars novels and comics which now don't mean anything anymore in the lore?

  9. #5009
    Senator
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,121

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Wasted? no way.
    I gonna reread the X-Wing series again, the NJO and think to my self how much better I´ve been entertained in contrast to the new lore.

  10. #5010
    Lord Oda Nobunaga's Avatar 大信皇帝
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Azuchi-jō Tenshu
    Posts
    23,463

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Not really. I still read Expanded Universe comics and books. Only downside is that they will probably never continue that material. Unless Disney sees a massive loss in profits and Marvel/Disney stops wanking themselves. Honest question, did anyone even read the old Marvel comics? They should have brought back some of the novels instead. A lot of people wanted to read the Jaina Solo books which got canceled (not me personally but still). Could have kept the Luke story going etc.

    "Famous general without peer in any age, most superior in valor and inspired by the Way of Heaven; since the provinces are now subject to your will it is certain that you will increasingly mount in victory." - Ōgimachi-tennō

  11. #5011

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Most read like fan fiction, so outside a couple of gems, not a great loss.

    There were some fun issues from Marvel's run.
    Eats, shoots, and leaves.

  12. #5012
    HannibalExMachina's Avatar Just a sausage
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    11,244

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Quote Originally Posted by Wallachian View Post
    Does anyone here feel like they have wasted years of their life reading Expanded Universe Star Wars novels and comics which now don't mean anything anymore in the lore?
    scew the lore, its the story and its meaning that counts. the different levels of canon SW had never made any sense anyway, either it is canon, or it aint.

    if i watch the movies, whats in them is canon. everything else is arbitrary.

  13. #5013
    Aexodus's Avatar Persuasion>Coercion
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    8,765
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Eh still, the new trilogy isn’t great lore. Lore is what makes large multi-movie sagas like this worth investing in.
    Patronised by Pontifex Maximus
    Quote Originally Posted by Himster View Post
    The trick is to never be honest. That's what this social phenomenon is engineering: publicly conform, or else.

  14. #5014

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Let's be real, the new trilogy has lore and world building. The story itself isn't necessarily bad, I've certainly watched and read a lot of different articles on the series that really helped me appreciate the new trilogy more. However, I don't think anyone here is particularly enthused with the lore. This is actually where the prequels were really great. They may have been bad movies but the lore was epic.

  15. #5015
    Lord Oda Nobunaga's Avatar 大信皇帝
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Azuchi-jō Tenshu
    Posts
    23,463

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    For me the lore wasn't really a factor. I just think the movies and the characters really suck.

    "Famous general without peer in any age, most superior in valor and inspired by the Way of Heaven; since the provinces are now subject to your will it is certain that you will increasingly mount in victory." - Ōgimachi-tennō

  16. #5016
    Wallachian's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    9,778

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Quote Originally Posted by HannibalExMachina View Post
    scew the lore, its the story and its meaning that counts. the different levels of canon SW had never made any sense anyway, either it is canon, or it aint.

    if i watch the movies, whats in them is canon. everything else is arbitrary.
    Well to me the lore is very important. The canon system was an organised mess and it worked really well. Even when they did the PT it didn't mess up the lore completely and any inconsistencies were nicely retconned.

  17. #5017
    Aexodus's Avatar Persuasion>Coercion
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    8,765
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Oda Nobunaga View Post
    For me the lore wasn't really a factor. I just think the movies and the characters really suck.
    Daisy Ridley’s Rey is a really weak character. She’s just a boring action heroine, and Ridley seems to have on facial expression: surprised with her mouth agape all the time.
    Patronised by Pontifex Maximus
    Quote Originally Posted by Himster View Post
    The trick is to never be honest. That's what this social phenomenon is engineering: publicly conform, or else.

  18. #5018
    Lord Oda Nobunaga's Avatar 大信皇帝
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Azuchi-jō Tenshu
    Posts
    23,463

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    These movies are so awful. Even if I cared about the characters, I would stop caring after sitting through two hours of that. Ruined the original trilogy in a way that the prequel trilogy could never do (by virtue of being a sequel of course).

    "Famous general without peer in any age, most superior in valor and inspired by the Way of Heaven; since the provinces are now subject to your will it is certain that you will increasingly mount in victory." - Ōgimachi-tennō

  19. #5019

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    Daisy Ridley’s Rey is a really weak character. She’s just a boring action heroine, and Ridley seems to have on facial expression: surprised with her mouth agape all the time.
    It's not entirely her fault, she was written as a bad character that started out as a Mary Sue. I guess the writers were afraid of catching heat from the usual grievance mongers, so they avoided making her as complex character and went straight into "strong womyn" mode.

  20. #5020

    Default Re: 'Star Wars' discussions

    Rogue One was great. The mainline stories and sadly the Solo stories have been crap. Want me to spend $17.00 to watch a movie? Abandon your politically motivated justice warrior timeline. I don't care. Write a good story devoid of overwriting political themes. When I PAY MONEY to ENTERTAIN MYSELF do you honestly think I not only pay money to hear (your idiotic, uninformed, unsourced, propaganda driven perspective) opinion, but hear your opinion uncritically? Bye.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •