Do You Like The Garrison Script?

[Hugyfew]

Asking 'cuz I don't like it. But it feels like cheating to completely remove it.



...



...Need to write anythin' else?

[Kiliç Alì]

You may add if you think it is necessary such a garrison script, and if it could be done better.

I don't like it, but I don't like taxes either.

[The Despondent Mind]

Always hated it, always will.

[British empire]

I mostly play MOS I can turn off the garrison script there. But its in DAC, and taking capital cities is a pain but fun

[Jmonstra]

I like it. Otherwise AI factions just collapse under the weight of each other like a tiny barstool underneath a fat woman.

[Vossie]

A little elaboration on the why would be appreciated.

I do like the garrison script. Two reasons.

1. The garrison script prevents the AI factions from being destroyed to quickly. ( Hence the main reason it's in the mod )
2. It adds to the difficulty and IMO it's more fun to take a capital city that's well defended then being able to auto-resolve and skip the whole thing. ( It even contributes to the "realism". )

[Ngugi]

...Need to write anythin' else?

Yes, actually I would be pleased if you do, because I fail to see the purpose of this thread and why it should be kept open.

TATW has no development any longer, meaning the aim can not be to discuss a potential change in the game.

To know if 17 or so players Do Like it and 10 Do Not Like it when there's about half a million players of TATW 3.0 alone contribute nothing relevant at all. People's opinion differs, we know that already, a Yes or No is pointless, especially since;

It's not a matter for a/the potential creation of a submod, because the FAQ tell you how to remove the garrison script for those who want to.

And with no intention presented or encouragment for debate about Con's and Pro's to why it should be used or not, or is good or not, with a poll that invite visitors to vote with no argumentation about the choice - there's no argument left as I can see for this thread.

[Lord Dakier]

I hate the idea of it but unless I'm mistaken I suppose the team have it scale with certain provinces. I besieged Helm's Deep and that wasn't even a full stack that appeared. Most mods just throw in a full force but I find the garrison script a happy medium.

[DrDragun]

I think it was the best solution available to increase difficulty and make lore-important settlements require a significant battle. The AI bonuses can be frustrating... I wish blockading ports actually had a strategic game impact, but unfortunately the game would be far too easy without these bonuses. It's mildly disappointing, but conquering the Black Gate defended by 1 Orc Band is a far greater disappointment. The bottom line is that I cannot think of a better solution.

[Bladvak]

I don't like it, but it's necessary.

Besides, it can be exploited or better yet, negated by the player.

[jinjo]

of course, i like it

[ElvenKind]

Soon we'll have polls about Dwarven beards, and Elven pointy ears..

[Pandarr]

Soon we'll have polls about Dwarven beards, and Elven pointy ears..

That would definitely be a very important poll ! Dwarven beards are really a serious matter ! On the other side, who cares about elven pointy ears ?

[ElvenKind]

On the other side, who cares about elven pointy ears ?

A poll: Who cares about elven pointy ears?

[LuckyPistol]

I only hate the Garrison script when it gives an unreasonable amount of high quality troops, like in Henneth Annun

[Ngugi]

Right; in the lack of reply or of elaborated OP, on behalf of the Local Moderators, this thread is


CLOSED

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

* Any moderation considerations are welcome, just send a PM *