Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 72

Thread: Would a Clinton/Petraeus ticket be in the future for 2016?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Would a Clinton/Petraeus ticket be in the future for 2016?

    Recently, GEN Petraeus (Ret) came out and stated Hillary Clinton would make a tremendous president. In light of this comes the possibility, however slim, of a combined ticket.

    Clinton gained a lot of respectability since 2008 during her time as Secretary of State, minus controversy over Benghazi. As such she is the Democratic front runner. If she was able to bring on Petraeus it could win over a larger number of Centrist voters. Republicans would be hard pressed to challenge the ticket on national defense.

    Post election, having him in the administration would be useful. Petraeus is an expert at working with Congress and managing the media. He was probably the first true rock star general since MacArthur. Being a bipartisan White house may also heal some the the partisanship rift.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  2. #2

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Doesn't his extramarital affair sort of make him a bad candidate? Republican's would probably focus on that. It's a sad and trivial aspects of anyone's legitimacy for such a position but it caries weight in USA.
    Last edited by PointOfViewGun; March 30, 2014 at 09:47 AM.
    The Armenian Issue
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930

    "We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."

  3. #3
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Setekh View Post
    Doesn't his extramarital affair sort of make him a bad candidate? Republican's would probably focus on that.
    Extramarital affairs are not a big deal as long as it wasn't a major scandal. Petraeus came out on his own and was not exposed by the media which means his image was barely touched. You can see it how the media treated the event, they regretted the fact Petraeus stepped down more than were outraged over the affair.

    Besides John McCain had an affair and it didn't hurt him.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  4. #4

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Extramarital affairs are not a big deal as long as it wasn't a major scandal. Petraeus came out on his own and was not exposed by the media which means his image was barely touched. You can see it how the media treated the event, they regretted the fact Petraeus stepped down more than were outraged over the affair.

    Besides John McCain had an affair and it didn't hurt him.
    That I didn't know. Then, yes, he could be a great candidate.
    The Armenian Issue
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930

    "We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."

  5. #5

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    that would be horrible

  6. #6
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yosemite View Post
    that would be horrible
    Explanation?
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  7. #7
    The Noble Lord's Avatar Holy Arab Nation
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Peshawar, Pakistan - Kabul, Afghanistan
    Posts
    7,809

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Explanation?
    Well, she is the wife of a liar, cheater, war criminal and a scumbag, her husband should be already at the war crimes tribunal, plus what does she know about problems facing America today.
    Now Petraeus is a good and stand-up guy, career officer and one with distinction as well. His extramarital affair would not hurt him that much, but the guy doesn't have charisma and wit
    to defend himself when he is called for it, during the election campaign for example!
    [IMG][/IMG]
    أسد العراق Asad al-Iraq
    KOSOVO IS SERBIA!!!
    Under the proud patronage of the magnificent Tzar


  8. #8
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Noble Lord View Post
    Now Petraeus is a good and stand-up guy, career officer and one with distinction as well. His extramarital affair would not hurt him that much, but the guy doesn't have charisma and wit
    to defend himself when he is called for it, during the election campaign for example!
    Petraeus has charisma, so much so he is given almost mythical powers:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/a-soldiers-miracle/
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  9. #9

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Farnan View Post
    Explanation?
    the democrats attempted to start a war with syria, went to lybia, drone strikes and the continuation of the NSA scandal
    all the sweet lies from obama and hilary
    it's only when a whistle blower, who is considered a traitor by the politicians at home, spills all the beans that we start seeing something positive from obama

    the rest of the world does not want to see a bush 3.0

  10. #10
    Earl Dibbles Jr's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    On a need-to-know basis, and you don't need to know.
    Posts
    1,526

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    If the U.S. is dumb enough to elect another Democrat after Obama's debacle they deserve the hell that's going to come to them.

  11. #11
    Heinz Guderian's Avatar *takes off trousers
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    16,504

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrZanyGaming View Post
    If the U.S. is dumb enough to elect another Democrat after Obama's debacle they deserve the hell that's going to come to them.
    i didnt know people still read Tim LeHay fiction.




  12. #12

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Heinz Guderian View Post
    i didnt know people still read Tim LeHay fiction.
    This is ZanyGaming you're quoting. The NSA will be a brilliant institution once a Republican is in the White House.
    One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
    -Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.

  13. #13
    Earl Dibbles Jr's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    On a need-to-know basis, and you don't need to know.
    Posts
    1,526

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaidin View Post
    This is ZanyGaming you're quoting. The NSA will be a brilliant institution once a Republican is in the White House.
    If you honestly think that I have party loyalty then you must not be paying attention. I've said in numerous threads that Bush was a idiot and should have never been elected as president. Looking at the Democrat's candidates currently and looking at what Obama has done in the past 6 years I can draw the conclusion that the last thing the U.S. needs is a liberal in charge again. That's not to say that the Republican candidates are a shining beacon, just that they are the lesser of two evils.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrZanyGaming View Post
    If the U.S. is dumb enough to elect another Democrat after Obama's debacle they deserve the hell that's going to come to them.
    And what is that?


    If you ever find violence doesn't solves anything, you haven't used enough.

  15. #15
    Earl Dibbles Jr's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    On a need-to-know basis, and you don't need to know.
    Posts
    1,526

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by GreyFox View Post
    And what is that?
    Increased taxes, oppression through the NSA and other such "programs," more unjustified drone strikes, worse healthcare...the list goes on and on.

  16. #16
    Vanoi's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    17,003

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrZanyGaming View Post
    Increased taxes, oppression through the NSA and other such "programs," more unjustified drone strikes, worse healthcare...the list goes on and on.
    Both of those were started under the bush administration. And expanded. Patriot Act anyone?

  17. #17
    Ciciro's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Capital
    Posts
    4,038

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrZanyGaming View Post
    Increased taxes
    Increased taxes? I think you mean trying to end those idiotic bush tax cuts.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrZanyGaming View Post
    Increased taxes, oppression through the NSA and other such "programs," more unjustified drone strikes, worse healthcare...the list goes on and on.
    Right... Well let's assume you have a point. How is the Tea Party any better?

  19. #19
    Earl Dibbles Jr's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    On a need-to-know basis, and you don't need to know.
    Posts
    1,526

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukiyama View Post
    Right... Well let's assume you have a point. How is the Tea Party any better?
    They aren't. I feel that they do far more harm to the Republican party than good.

  20. #20
    Sir Winston Churchill's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    11,515

    Default Re: Would a Clinton/Petraeus be in the future for 2016?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrZanyGaming View Post
    Increased taxes,
    Oh no, more taxes to pay for things like the military and other social security? The horror. God save us if he touches the rich too, or god forbid raises the minimum wage.

    oppression through the NSA and other such "programs,"
    Do you even know what oppression is? Not saying the antics of the NSA is good at all, but far from "oppression".
    more unjustified drone strikes,
    If there was a Republican in office there would be even more unjustified everything. We'd probably be at war with Russia right now.
    worse healthcare...
    Um... no? More like better healthcare that rich rightists have been trying to fight tooth and nail ignoring the huge benefits from the system, like insurance companies actually having to have regulation so they don't screw you over. So far "Obamacare horror stories" have turned out to be fake or simply wrong. Healthcare isn't getting worse, it's getting cheaper, easier to get, with better coverage. Sounds better to me.

    Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
    — CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalminar View Post
    My statements are correct by virtue of me saying them. Additional proof is not required.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •