Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: RTR vs EB

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default RTR vs EB

    hi,

    i don't know how many years I've been playing EB on my Mac. But I finally got a bit bored and decided to try a different mod. Tried to download Alexander, but couldn't for some reason. Then I managed to get RTR to work.

    I've played it for the last week. I have to say, I am very disappointed. I miss a lot of the EB family traits and details. I 'm playing as Makedonia--- I own Krete and Rhodes but cannot recruit Kretan archers or Rhodian slingers-- wtf?

    I do like that there seems to be more seaborne invasions.. and the AI is more aggressive in battles.

    But I'm already considering going back to EB or really trying to figure out why Alexander won't download.

    anyway, this isn't really a flame. Maybe I'm missing something. Anybody else have any similar experiences when playing the 2 different mods?

    thanks

  2. #2
    yuezhi's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cell 42
    Posts
    1,175

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    The story is pretty much the same everywhere:
    after EB, RTW is never the same much less satisfactory.

    The only way to break out of this monotony is to play something extremely different like ETW.
    all hail the flying spaghetti monster!

  3. #3
    Boriak's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,199

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by yuezhi View Post
    The story is pretty much the same everywhere:
    after EB, RTW is never the same much less satisfactory.
    Guilty.

    Quote Originally Posted by yuezhi View Post
    The only way to break out of this monotony is to play something extremely different like ETW.
    I tend to play Mount and Blade in between though right now I went back to Assassin's Creed 1. Different genre so it doesn't really count.

  4. #4
    yuezhi's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cell 42
    Posts
    1,175

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by Boriak View Post
    Guilty.
    all hail the flying spaghetti monster!

  5. #5
    Bcman's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,435

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Whenever I get bored of EB I play something that's 360 of what EB is. Usually Napoleon TGW mod, or EUIV
    Bye day the banished sun circles the earth like a grieving mother with a lamp- The Road

  6. #6

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    update: i re-installed EB. I tried to play a campaign using BI, but for some reason, could not start a campaign (could not access the starting screen).... thats ok, i loaded it on RTW and started a Baktria campaign last night.

  7. #7

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    What is the the difference between running EB on RTW.exe or BI.exe ?

  8. #8

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by Leonidas II View Post
    What is the the difference between running EB on RTW.exe or BI.exe ?
    hi,
    not sure with EB... the game loaded with BI, but when i tried to start a NEW CAMPAIGN, there were no factions to choose from--- the list was absent.

    when I played RTR with BI, I had the night battles, the AI seemed more aggressive in battles, lots more AI ships and seabourne invasions.

  9. #9
    Ownager's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    I wish I lived in Rome.
    Posts
    1,007

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    You can do the same for EB right? Night battles? How do you enable them?
    "It is the part of the fool to say, I should not have thought." -Scipio Africanus

    "We will either find a way or make one." -Hannibal Barca

  10. #10

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by Ownager View Post
    You can do the same for EB right? Night battles? How do you enable them?
    thats one thing i wanted with BI, but as above, wasn't able to load a game with EB on BI

  11. #11
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    116

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    in the EB FAQ, there's a link on how to make EB work with BI exe

  12. #12
    Ownager's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    I wish I lived in Rome.
    Posts
    1,007

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Ok, thanks.
    "It is the part of the fool to say, I should not have thought." -Scipio Africanus

    "We will either find a way or make one." -Hannibal Barca

  13. #13
    Samariten's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,048

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Thats the EB "curse" once hit by it you cant get rid of it. Play around with some mods for MTWII like Stainless steel or Third Age : Total War they are rather neat or Shogun 2 as Hattori clan : ) .

  14. #14
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    116

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    I haven't played RTR since before EB was out. It was the first "realism" mod I played.

    I then switched to SPQR, some of the best battles I've had. They felt truly epic with multiple armies each time, relentless AI and the map has this zoomed in look that makes it look bigger than EB at least.

    Tried Extended cultures for a while after not playing rtw at all for years. It is a nice mod that doesn't feel too different from main game. I mean it is very different but the shock of learning new mechanics is not as big as EB and the factions are for the most part the same ones as in vanilla.

    I would like if in EB the map was more zoomed in, with focus on the adriatic area. I could do with out Baktria, Saka rauka etc. You get filthy rich quick too. Maybe the upkeep is not high enough for units.

    I might try SPQR again once I get a new machine, I read there's going to be a new version and I need my fix for epic battles.

    But yeah, the detail on EB with everything from units' skins, traits, retinues, events, the character names etc is unmatched.

  15. #15
    Brihentin13's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Inside the TV.
    Posts
    1,600

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    I had the same experience. I stopped playing RTR pretty quickly. Another post recommended trying something completely different, and I agree. You're not going to beat EB in the historical mod department. Try something unrealistic or fantasy oriented. There's always talk about The Third Age mod, and I personally love Hyrule Total War.

    EB is the best mod in history...so try something outside of history!

    Free Kekistan

  16. #16
    demagogos nicator's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    2,418

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    I must disagree about RTR. Have you tried RTR VII (which is the last official version of the mod)?

    RTR VII may lack in comparation with EB in trait system and barbarian unit variation but on the other hand it gives great additional strategic expirience in having huge map covering geographicaly smaller area. This smaller geograpical scope of the map allows the mod to include the factions which would not be otherwise represented ( e.g. Achaian and Aitolian league, Sparta, Noricum, Kingdom of Ardeae). Miniregions and minifactions in my opininion also greatly contributes to the game. I just remember my first campaign as Carthage. The conquest of Sicily changed from taking over three or four settlements which is the case in other mods into epic ten years (40 turns) long war when I first have to fight the forces of 3 different factions involved (+ free peoples).

    I also do nto really sea where RTR VII lacks in history or realism in comparation wiht EB. IMO, both the campaign map and units are well researched and well designed and I am pretty sure you wont find fantasy unit in RTR VII (well maybe except Carthaginian Sacred Band). I also think that 40 turn recruitment limits on the most elite units an battle mechanics feels very realistic in RTR.

    I personally find very satisfying to play both EB and RTR and enjoying the best what each of them has to offer

  17. #17

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Haha, I remember this debate taking place when I first joined The Org, years back. The more things change. . .
    Son of PW

  18. #18
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    116

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    Quote Originally Posted by demagogos nicator View Post
    I must disagree about RTR. Have you tried RTR VII (which is the last official version of the mod)?

    RTR VII may lack in comparation with EB in trait system and barbarian unit variation but on the other hand it gives great additional strategic expirience in having huge map covering geographicaly smaller area. This smaller geograpical scope of the map allows the mod to include the factions which would not be otherwise represented ( e.g. Achaian and Aitolian league, Sparta, Noricum, Kingdom of Ardeae). Miniregions and minifactions in my opininion also greatly contributes to the game. I just remember my first campaign as Carthage. The conquest of Sicily changed from taking over three or four settlements which is the case in other mods into epic ten years (40 turns) long war when I first have to fight the forces of 3 different factions involved (+ free peoples).

    I also do nto really sea where RTR VII lacks in history or realism in comparation wiht EB. IMO, both the campaign map and units are well researched and well designed and I am pretty sure you wont find fantasy unit in RTR VII (well maybe except Carthaginian Sacred Band). I also think that 40 turn recruitment limits on the most elite units an battle mechanics feels very realistic in RTR.

    I personally find very satisfying to play both EB and RTR and enjoying the best what each of them has to offer
    That actually sounds pretty cool. I haven't tried the most recent RTR but I would like a game that focus on a smaller region.

    There was a recent post over at the .com that I thought was great, it was something like this:

    "You start the campaign on a max zoomed in campaign map and you have to conquer the neighboring regions, after you have established hegemony over a large part of land the maps zooms out.

    For example as Rome you start as just one city and have to conquer your neighbours, once you have conquered Italy for example, the map zooms out and now there's only three provinces representing your empire like now in the actual campaign map for Rome2. You also get to see other cultures. The more you conquer the bigger and more zoomed out the map gets."

    I would love that.

  19. #19

    Default Re: RTR vs EB

    hi,

    I have a Mac computer, so I could only play RTRPE..... I did like the fact that there were more cities to conquer in each region.

    the only mods I can choose from (because of the Mac) are RTRPE and EB.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •