Maoism, Stalinism and Nazism. Crimes against humanity and state capitalism

[Thorn777]

Thread split is split off from here-Adar

What could be scarier than a combination of nationalists, nukes and Chinese?

The agression of loosening one-child labor camps?

[Condottiere 40K]

Lebensraum.

[Diocle]

I think there needs to be a spin off of Godwin's law to include people comparing others to Neville Chamberlain. And saying the CCP is worse than the Nazis is plane idiotic.

Well, to be more idiot I state that the Chinese Maoist Party is worse than than Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei of Adolf Hitler.

Ask to the guys of Tienanmen ....

Images depicting the victims of massacres are not appropriate for TWC -Adar

... so I think that imagining a self reforming Maoist Party is not only naive, but also dangerous and idiotic, but sadly as we say in Italy: 'The mom of the idiots is always pregnant!'

[Farnan]

Well, to be more idiot I state that the Chinese Maoist Party is worse than than Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei of Adolf Hitler.

Ask to the guys of Tienanmen ....

... so I think that imagining a self reforming Maoist Party is not only naive, but also dangerous and idiotic, but sadly as we say in Italy: 'The mom of the idiots is always pregnant!'

So now I know to move on...

Vanoi: Not saying they wouldn't take them if offered, but the CCP knows that getting them is unfeasible in the foreseeable future.

[Adar]

Contests to show the most horrific images of crimes against humanity are not appropriate for this forum as we have users who may be young or sensitive to such imagery.

Obscene Content (1, 3, 6, or 12 points)

Obscene content is not allowed. This includes, but is not limited to:
Providing images or videos of nudity. Nudity includes:

• Any figure whose genitals, pubic hair, buttocks, or (if female) nipples or areolas are exposed, partially or totally; or are not exposed, but it's clear that this is only because of the angle of the shot or incidental intervening objects (e.g., hands, hair, bits of cloth).
• Visible outlines of genitals or female nipples through clothing.
• Anything that falls narrowly outside the previous provisions, at the discretion of the moderators.

This applies to photographs, drawings, or any other representation of humanoid figures. It may also apply to non-humanoid figures such as animals, at the discretion of the moderators. Nudity may be permitted for serious and non-titillating purposes, such as the exhibition of recognized art or historical models in modifications, at the discretion of the moderators.

• Providing image, video, or audio files that represent or hint at sexual intercourse, foreplay, , etc.
• Verbally describing genitals, sex acts, , or similarly inappropriate content. This does not include passing references, but includes descriptions that are graphic or include any details.
• Providing images, videos, or verbal descriptions of an unreasonably disgusting nature. This includes, but is not limited to: excrement, real-world violence, and extreme virtual or imagined violence.
  

Links may not be posted for the purpose of providing obscene content. If a website incidentally includes some reasonably obscene content, it's acceptable to link to it for some other purpose as long as a clear warning is given. Similarly, if content incidentally includes some reasonably obscene content, it's acceptable to include it in a post for some other purpose, as long as a clear warning is given and the reader must actively click a button to view it (e.g., spoiler boxes or YouTube videos).

[Diocle]

Capitalism doesn't equal democracy. China is still an Oligarchy.

Don't let the CCPs name confuse you, they believe in State Capitalism.

Ah well, if they believe in State Capitalism, as Stalin & Hitler, we can sleep peacefully!

For those who don't want to sleep peacefully dreaming about a self-reforming Nazional-Communist Party in China, this is what Human Right Watch writes about China, today AD 2013:

• HUMAN RIGHTS IN CHINA
  China’s new leadership assumed power in November, ending the decade-long reign of Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao. China’s citizens had no say in the selection of their new leaders, highlighting that, despite the country’s rapid modernization, the government remains an authoritarian one-party system. The government curbs freedom of expression, association, and religion, and controls all judicial institutions. It censors the press and enforces highly repressive policies in ethnic minority areas in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia. At the same time, citizens are increasingly prepared to challenge authorities over issues such as land seizures, forced evictions, abuses of power by corrupt cadres, discrimination, and economic inequalities.

Link, it should be allowed on TWC, in fact also the children should read it: http://www.hrw.org/asia/china

[Farnan]

Stalin didn't believe in State Captilism, but in Communism..

No one said China wasn't an authoritarian nation, it is very authoritarian but not even close to Stalinism, Nazism or China under Mao. And it's not the National Communism party, it's the CCP. Please learn something in life before you comment.

[Diocle]

It's called Chinese Communist Party that is Chinese National-Communist Party that is a Party based on the National Communist Ideology of Mao Tze Tung.

It can be called 'Nazional-Communist' because a Communist Party to be called Communist has to be Internationalist, the Communism in a single country means Stalinism that is Nazional-Communism.

Now, read Marx and Lenin (as I did thousands of times) and say: 'Thanks Diocle! Today I've learnt a new word!'

.... becuase I've found the time to teach you something about what is called Communism and what has to be called Nazi-Communist Crap!!!!

[Stavroforos]

I suppose they wouldn't call it Nazional because no such word exists.

[athanaric]

I suppose they wouldn't call it Nazional because no such word exists.

It does... in Italian.

[Stavroforos]

Good thing this isn't an Italian forum then.

[O'Hea]

So uh... does this thread exist for any purpose other than for Diocle to rant about semantics and indulge his Chinese hate-boner?