[HS] Westeros: A New Beginning 2

[Iron Aquilifer]

Dunno just Axis said that he was now Stark and Matto was Arryn

[Alrichwell]

Soul said he dont have time to play but maybe he can admin , He is doing a good job in WOC

[irishviking5]

So I will take Joffrey.

[Iron Aquilifer]

ForBalin is Joffrey, I am sorry

[Matto16]

irishviking5 is our new Joffrey since he respond on my PM before ForBalin did. However I will keep ForBalin in mind should we need a replacement.

I have contact Soul about beeing admin in this game. Now we will only have to wait for his response since all places are already taken.

[SoulGamesInc]

I am your Admin, look upon me and despair!
Stannis Up! - http://www.mediafire.com/download/kg..._Stannis_1.sav

[Ice Eyes]

Why this faction order?

[SoulGamesInc]

According to Matto it's in order of Weakest > Strongest. I guess he wished the smaller factions to move before the bigger ones.

[Ice Eyes]

Ok, sounds good but I'm towards the bottom in turn order :p

[SoulGamesInc]

Ahh, didn't notice you were playing Ice. In my defense i just woke up.
Take your complaints to Matto, it's his strat file lol.

[Ice Eyes]

No complaint needed I just want to play my turns earliy hahaha

[Iron Aquilifer]

Past its Xmas so is it alright if I get an extension until tomorrow?

[SoulGamesInc]

Ofc Mannis. I myself am busy today also, the majority of people understand that.

[Ramsay Snow]

No building destruction. Burning down everything is a 'cheap' source of gold, and feels rather weird. Not that I never do it or anything, but I'd make it a rule in my hotseat


EDIT: Heroic victories are not allowed unless the same outcome is reached three consecutive times (save and load), the Admin always checks this to be sure.



Could we change this please. Im not interested in playing another HS where this rule is in place.

[Alrichwell]

this post is not good

[Matto16]

I also agree with King Joffrey. I would change the rule regarding destroying buildings to this one:

Destroying buildings is not allowed in these 3 situations:

1. If the settlement is under siege
2. A far superior army is one turn away from the settlement. *exception: if it is turn one it is allowed
3. You have not yet held that settlement for 3 turns *exception: does not apply on turn 1-3 on home regions

[Alrichwell]

ok now i understand its the way you mantion the no destroying building that confusing me ,

No i vote no on the destroing building , i like it like that , its so retard to destroy building by my gest ,bigger faction have a double advantage with that for having more building to destroy , its really retard i dont even understand why its legit anywhere , burning building and selling rocks and used plank dont bring a lot of money , a lord dont destroy his own building , if you want to destroy building , invade and pillage or sack then its on the new lord to repair or not his building , this is lorewise , any building destruction , beside religious one dont make any sence , i find it retard that most of the comunauty acord on the fact we should destroy building


about the heroic victory i am ok to change it or i will sink all your fleet with a single longboat

[Ramsay Snow]

* Double post.

[Ramsay Snow]

this post is not good

ok now i understand its the way you mantion the no destroying building that confusing me ,

No i vote no on the destroing building , i like it like that , its so retard to destroy building by my gest ,bigger faction have a double advantage with that for having more building to destroy , its really retard i dont even understand why its legit anywhere , burning building and selling rocks and used plank dont bring a lot of money , a lord dont destroy his own building , if you want to destroy building , invade and pillage or sack then its on the new lord to repair or not his building , this is lorewise , any building destruction , beside religious one dont make any sence , i find it retard that most of the comunauty acord on the fact we should destroy building


about the heroic victory i am ok to change it or i will sink all your fleet with a single longboat

The problem then becomes, too little starting money. I played in the first NB HS as Stannis. With only one settlement and a declining income, I made rash decisions which will probably have me killed next turn. (Granted, I could have played smarter, no doubt.) Stannis needs some type of financial help. Do you think the Lannisters only have 10,000 dragons? doubtful. Maybe we can all agree to a NAP for about 5 turns while we balance our income out. JK Not every settlement trains a military... why do they need barracks and blacksmiths?


EDIT: Just looked at the game. Awesome job, Matto. 2 more questions, though..



Is that where you want Seagard? I followed the instructions about it being in the wrong place, before I opened the game. Thats where it ended up.

Also, Gregor Clegane is too far into the Riverlands to respect the 1 turn peace. I dont think I could fort him, so what should I do? Or wait, is there no 1 turn peace?


Can we get the rules in order?

[Alrichwell]

i dont know about Stannis economic stability , since i never try them but i dont think allowing destroying building will compensate for that , i think it can just make bigger the economical gap between smaller faction and bigger faction , am i wrong on that ?