
Originally Posted by
Hawkeye74
I am barred from knowing who is trading with who?
I am barred from knowing the progress of other factions against my own?
I can in no be way secretive about the money I give to factions?
I cannot setup regular tribute to factions?
My generals die off within seven or eight turns?
that it takes 10 years to sail from Portugal to Italy?
That I cannot know how many people there are in a settlement?
That if my army is sitting in an enemy region and raiding it does not cause devastation or effect any aspect of the region?
That all of the assets of a region are situated in the town? From a historical point of view this is stupido, Ca got it right in previous titles, but have taken a step back...the real question is why.
I see a lot of people on here harping on about those who are complaining about the quality of the release, and I address this to those who are happy with Rome 2 as it stands.
This is much like the original Star Wars and the recent movies....you can tell a fan of these movies because they hate George Lucas, in principle it's the same kind of thing. I would also say, if you've never played the original Rome, go have a look at it, maybe the graphics aren't what you are used to, but back then even the best software engines weren't that good because of the technology available, but what was available and what made CA titles cutting edge back then was gameplay, and the kind of depth that forgave the 'cutting edge' graphics' that very few could afford and made do with the mid range systems.
Now we got the technology and the fantastic graphics, it may be that pretty pictures is what it's all about these days, and if so then my days as a gamer are numbered, because like most gamers my age that's those in their 30's we grew up with kak visuals and knew a good game when we saw one because it held our attention, not because of the pretty picture but because of the game play.
And I refer to another old title that still has a strong community, that is the Close Combat series, graphics minimal, but gameplay that has until today never been surpassed.
I'm sure this has all be said before, and I'm sure the lovers and the hater with put their oar in, but honestly I'm kinda tired of it too. Rome 2 is a huge disappointment there is no getting away from it, but at the end of the day that is just my opinion, which I am entitled to.
Don't get me wrong I've put the hours in and there is a lot to be said for what CA have done, but Shogun it is not, Rome it is not, Medieval it is not, and only because of the campaign itself, and that is a damn shame. I suppose at some point some of us have to admit to ourselves that 'we' are no longer the demographic, just the % that makes up the 'will buy anyway', whereas the rest of the buying public are.
I would say if this is a portent of things to come, what with the games workshop title in the works doing what's been done here threatens to alienate a wider more fanatical community and drive CA further into the ground in terms of its reputation. After bouncing back like Rocky Balboa from Empire with Shogun 2, is Rome 2 CA's BA Baracas, if so, then there is still hope.
Once we spoke CA's name in breathless whispers, now for the most part all I hear is contempt.
But we all do wish in our heart of hearts, those who care, that with the coming patches we may see a u turn on some of the included features, and the inclusion of some features that have been sadly left out, and again hope that unlike Empire, Rome is not abandoned.
Peace.