Enemy (Isengard in this case) gives up to easily

[Nachtwaker]

Hello everybodyI play as Gondor and I like nice balanced factions. But Isengard always (also when I played with Eriador) falls apart easily without me fighting then. This makes the High Elves and Rohan way to strong which eventually make Mordor and the other evil factions to weak. Leaving me no challenge.How can I prevent Isengard to fall apart? I have a save game 2 -3 turns before it happens I guess. Any ideas?Thank you.

[Macilrille]

Play MOS

Oh... Edit; welcome to the forum.

[jinjo]

in my campaigns, isengard crushes rohan quite easily, then goes vs gondor
in 1 of 10 only, rohan defeats isengard, otherwise it gets crushed.
i play vanilla, without any submods

[Nachtwaker]

Thank you for the welcome.I don't play with any submods either and 2 times I played a campaign... 2 times Isengard gets owned. Last time they even gave up before they lost all their cities

[Macilrille]

Try MOS, and remember VH/VH difficulty. If you want a challenge in MOS, accept Eastern Shadows, Isengard's Forces, Rhûn Documents, Saruman's Documents, Call of Sauron, Earlier Invasion. I promise you that Rohan, then Gondor will be PWNed.

[Nachtwaker]

Forgive me being a newbie, explain MOS please

[Ngugi]

Your experience sounds quite random (as each campaign varies), in my experience Isengard generally, although first after long time due to the game's balance, come off as the stronger of it and Rohan.

MOS is a submod to TATW 3.2 and can be found here http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...ummervacation!

[Nachtwaker]

Should I only install 1.5 + 1.6 for MOS?

[Macilrille]

Yes, but questions about MOS should be asked in the MOS-thread.

[Takizama]

Ill install the higher version if i were you.

[Macilrille]

Ill install the higher version if i were you.

1.6 needs 1.5 to work. And there is now a 1.61 patch.

[Takizama]

1.6 needs 1.5 to work. And there is now a 1.61 patch.

Ya i kind of implied that in my post. Installing the higher one usually means u need the lower one to run. It says that on the mods page.

[k/t]

You didn't imply that.

[Takizama]

You didn't imply that.

Thats a subjective statement with evidence to backup your claim. Thanks for the post.

[Macilrille]

It is definately not worth arguing over.

I too thought you recommended installing only 1.6, but I see that your sentence can indeed be interpreted both ways in its brewity, so why argue? It matters not, Nachtwaker had his answer, and that is what matters.

[k/t]

BC 2.3 doesn't require BC 2.02.

Thanks for your ambiguous, misleading post.