Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: Time to end the debate...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Remo's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,603

    Default Time to end the debate...

    Shogun 2 looks better than Rome 2, and I'm going to explain why.

    First, to help, let's all sit down and watch this very special episode of Extra Credits.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oK8UTRgvJU

    Now that we have that out of the way, let's talk about Rome 2 and Shogun 2.

    Rome 2 only has its setting going for it. It's a mixture of drab browns for its color palette. When it does include different colors they are extremely saturated. The sound of the game is completely lacking, the music as most have complained is horrible compared to previous games.

    YES, Rome 2 has better graphics, but woopty freakin' doo. If the Aesthetics of the game are bad, graphics only become an annoyance. Nobody wants to turn on Depth of Field and make the already all brown setting look blurry as well. People complaining about the pixelation of the armies when zoomed out (On Max graphics Unlimited Graphics Memory, even I get it), and the blocky shadows at times. This is all the fault of good graphics crappy aesthetics.

    Shogun 2 on the other hand has great sound, the colors POP, the setting is exaggerated with the falling cherry blossoms and other things to draw you in. The Music man, Shogun 2 has some of the best music I have heard in a Total War game. Take the Fall of the Samurai DLC for instance. The music is different, it's a mixture of Western and Japanese music, this was chosen to draw you into the new setting. It does that perfectly, which is just amazing.

    Shogun 2 is the overall better looking and sounding game, and guess what, no FPS issues at the maximum of settings, no issues whatsoever.

    You are free to disagree with me, I welcome debate. Yet the facts remain...

  2. #2

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    A big issue for Rome 2 is that there is almost no way for you to tell your units apart from the enemies as any hellenistic faction (including carthage) at a glance or from a distance. I have lost a few battles just from thinking I have a unit sitting doing nothing, telling it to move, only to realise I just told it to disengage. I just couldn't tell there was a combat from a distance (reduced flags being the issue). Essentially all hoplites and phalangites look the same (good but the same) for each faction at a glance, few primary colours or faction colours to help.

    In shogun the faction colours showed up alot better meaning I could play with flags off. More immersive and easier to keep track of the battle (slower battles aswell ofc). Few factions provide this in Rome 2, rome itself is the faction that stands out most in battles.

    Thats my piece, thought it was a graphical difference worth noting, otherwise I agree with everything else Remo wrote.
    True bread is for True Romans

  3. #3
    Remo's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,603

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by KozaK101 View Post
    A big issue for Rome 2 is that there is almost no way for you to tell your units apart from the enemies as any hellenistic faction (including carthage) at a glance or from a distance. I have lost a few battles just from thinking I have a unit sitting doing nothing, telling it to move, only to realise I just told it to disengage. I just couldn't tell there was a combat from a distance (reduced flags being the issue). Essentially all hoplites and phalangites look the same (good but the same) for each faction at a glance, few primary colours or faction colours to help.

    In shogun the faction colours showed up alot better meaning I could play with flags off. More immersive and easier to keep track of the battle (slower battles aswell ofc). Few factions provide this in Rome 2, rome itself is the faction that stands out most in battles.

    Thats my piece, thought it was a graphical difference worth noting, otherwise I agree with everything else Remo wrote.
    Again, that's Rome 2's bad Aesthetics affecting gameplay mechanics. When everything just blends together into one big smudge, it can mess with gameplay.

  4. #4
    Irishman's Avatar Let me out of my mind
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,850

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by KozaK101 View Post
    A big issue for Rome 2 is that there is almost no way for you to tell your units apart from the enemies as any hellenistic faction (including carthage) at a glance or from a distance. I have lost a few battles just from thinking I have a unit sitting doing nothing, telling it to move, only to realise I just told it to disengage. I just couldn't tell there was a combat from a distance (reduced flags being the issue). Essentially all hoplites and phalangites look the same (good but the same) for each faction at a glance, few primary colours or faction colours to help.

    In shogun the faction colours showed up alot better meaning I could play with flags off. More immersive and easier to keep track of the battle (slower battles aswell ofc). Few factions provide this in Rome 2, rome itself is the faction that stands out most in battles.

    Thats my piece, thought it was a graphical difference worth noting, otherwise I agree with everything else Remo wrote.
    Its amazing that a huge complaint about Rome/Shogun 2/Medieval etc was the "cartoony" factions all being color coded. Now they go a small way to making the game look less risk-like, and people are complaining they can't tell the difference (the reason CA gave for the color-coded armies). It's funny.

    This really shouldn't be that much of a problem, of course, since there is the "highlight all" button that shows you every one of your troops and every enemy troops in bright colors and has been in every game.
    The flow of time is always cruel... its speed seems different for each person, but no one can change it... A thing that does not change with time is a memory of younger days...

    Under the perspicacious and benevolent patronage of the great and honorable Rez and a member of S.I.N


    He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Rome 2 just dont give me the feeling that rome 1 gave me. yes the graphics are great but thats is almost it.
    Last edited by Sir_Pee_Alot; September 14, 2013 at 04:58 PM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by Sir_Pee_Alot View Post
    Rome 2 just dont give me the feeling that rome 1 gave me. yes the graphics are great but thats is almost it.
    That feeling is called nostalgia.
    Lieber fünf Minuten feig als ein Leben lang tot.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    I would have the agree with the units blending into each other. I have to completely rely on tooltips and the golden rings around my units to see who's winning and losing. I think I downloaded a graphics filter thing so it looks a lot more colourful, and it's much more enjoyable to watch.

    The sound is amazing for the marching and weapons, but I agree that the music is a bit naff. Doesn't sound that Roman or Greek to me...
    Last edited by musketeer101; September 14, 2013 at 05:05 PM.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    I completely agree, one of the reasons its so obvious in Rome 2 is because Shogun 2 was incredible looking.

    I think CA should know the difference since theyre fans of Extra Credits apparently:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbBHk_zLTmY


    Although I give CA respect for doing this, more companies should spend their marketing budget that way.
    Last edited by cevap; September 15, 2013 at 04:29 AM.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    He, he, units blending into each other because they share the same culture? As opposed to the little-boy's-wet-dream-martial-mentalist-fantasy-all-Japanese units of stw2?

    Time to take off the rose tinted glasses chaps and (as the advert over here goes) go to vision express.

    Eye tests all round me thinks.
    Last edited by Agent Provocateur; September 15, 2013 at 06:51 AM.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    people debate this fact?

  11. #11

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Rome 2 looks better; people clamoured for them to be "historically accurate" and now that they've done a bit of that, they complain that the units aren't colourful and shiny enough?! Shogun 2's units were practically fantasy men and the battle settings not a realistic portrayal of Japanese landscape at all! That's why it looked so pretty; because they designed the game to a fantastical ideal rather than a faithful rendering of feudal Japan. Whilst that was cool, I'm glad they haven't done that for this game.

    Anyhow I think you're flat out wrong anyway. Rome 2 looks beautiful!

  12. #12

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Rome 2 offers a more harsh, realistic look compared to the fantastical Shogun 2. Shogun 2's colors simply were not realistic, they were too vibrant. That's fine, if you enjoy it that is fair. I do not. I much prefer the more realistic, darker look that Rome 2 has. The aesthetic of it is simply superior in my opinion. Oh, and the graphics are better.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by Sanzo Hidochi View Post
    Rome 2 offers a more harsh, realistic look compared to the fantastical Shogun 2. Shogun 2's colors simply were not realistic, they were too vibrant. That's fine, if you enjoy it that is fair. I do not. I much prefer the more realistic, darker look that Rome 2 has. The aesthetic of it is simply superior in my opinion. Oh, and the graphics are better.

    this is a joke? RED SKY BLUE GRASS GREY SOLDIERS - is realistic colors according to you? Dude, you need to visit a doctor

  14. #14
    Dude with the Food's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Round the Corner.
    Posts
    1,800

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    What vonDuus said. I agree RTW feels like it made a bigger impactr on me but I still can't go back and play it. Compared to the the extreme brightness, saturation isn't that bad. Especially when you tweak the gamma and brightness in settings.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I am me. You are not me. You are you. If I was you, I wouldn't be me.
    If you were me, I'd be sad.But I wouldn't then be me because you'd be me so you wouldn't be me because I wasn't me because you were me but you couldn't be because I'd be a different me. I'd rather be any kind of bird (apart from a goose) than be you because to be you I'd have to not be me which I couldn't do unless someone else was me but then they would be you aswell so there would still be no me. They would be you because I was you so to restore balance you would have to be me and them meaning all three of us would become one continously the same. That would be very bad.


  15. #15
    ♘Top Hat Zebra's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    That place you go to when the world becomes too much? I'm in the world. I'm why it's too much.
    Posts
    5,659

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Shogun 2 was incredibly exaggerated. Which is great! It worked PERFECTLY for a game based on Feudal Japan. It fits so well with the culture... The game was very well done.I really cannot overstate how perfect the visuals in Shogun 2 were, considering the time period and culture. Even the bloodpack was perfectly fitting. However, that "Pop" as you put it, would not fit well with this gritty portrayal of classical warfare that they want to show.
    "Rajadharma! The Duty of Kings. Know you: Kingship is a Trust. The King is the most exalted and conscientious servant of the people."

  16. #16

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    does your game look like this at max? these screenshots are from alpha/beta with promise of more..





  17. #17

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by Red River View Post
    does your game look like this at max? these screenshots are from alpha/beta with promise of more..




    Very, very close absolute maximum settings. Lighting is somewhat different, though.

  18. #18
    Dimitris's Avatar Libertus
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    57

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by Red River View Post
    does your game look like this at max? these screenshots are from alpha/beta with promise of more..




    Even with everything at max rome 2 just looks a little better than med 2,but these screenshots are probably from complete rome 2, while we have the alpha/beta version...

  19. #19

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    I disagree on Rome II having poor sound.

    It sounds like a real symphony from me, and I play the drums in my high school band so I hear tons of different and varied instruments everyday.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Time to end the debate...

    Quote Originally Posted by thomascreel View Post
    I disagree on Rome II having poor sound.

    It sounds like a real symphony from me, and I play the drums in my high school band so I hear tons of different and varied instruments everyday.
    It sounds real alright, but it has a generic hollywood film sound thats so dull i cant even remember it and i just played it.

    Jeff Van Dycks (Did Med 1-2, Shogun 1-2 and Rome) music is far more memorable. It has that gamey sound that seems to be missing in a lot of games these days.


    And i completely agree with the op, Rome 2 looks shockingly bad from an aesthetic standpoint and anyone with any taste should be able to see this.
    Last edited by agent 47; September 15, 2013 at 09:02 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •