I feel be deceived a little：trailers like useing game made，but game don't like trailers.

[titanzwh]

when I get my rome2 and play， I found and very know CA do many many thing for Rome2，and in many many side，Rome2 beyond Rome1，but in hit and battle sense, Rome2 seems can't get Rome1‘s height totally.
those obviously example is：
The

propaganda trailers like useing the game made，but the really battle isn't like the trailers totally.

We know the Stw2's

propaganda trailers

is only a cg，the rome1’s trailers only use the gameself，but the rome2 don't like these two……

For obviously example，in trailers，when elephant charge, it have nice attack animation，but the game have no；in trailers，the infantry fight to each is full of power ，but the game isn't ike this. （the rome1's elephants also have the charge animation.)

And another key is the sliding obviously exist. It increase the distance between the real game and trailers，because the unit fight like a huddle together and push and shove against to die.（

Why CA not use the rome1’s collision

engin？？）

ps：in campaign，the rome2’s generals seems don't have the intesting character like rome1，I think this thing also a very pity things，I think it is the RTW‘s core cultural style and let many players delight in talking about it.
In summary，right now，march rome1，rome2 let me feel be deceived a little that caused by it's Commercial Packaging.
By means of this thing，I understand in the world the good game only comes out by accident，like Heroes3、Starcraft、Civilization4 and RTW1.
of course , lead to this feeling could because I too like rome total war to demand so much？—I don't know.
but I really think if the bad animation engin don't be fixed（it is reall harm three TW game），could ROME3 can fix this animations problem？

[kronpas]

We dont mind non native speakers (as Im one myself), but please restrain yourself from posting using machine translation like this.