Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    The city of Garama, capital of Garamantia somehow gives more income than all of Italia combined, is this a huge bug or intended?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    oil money

  3. #3

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    My guess is that the developers accidentally added an extra 8 to the intended income, making it 1548 instead of 154. They have 3 entire stacks of 20 units each so I can't really do much against them.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Quote Originally Posted by jimlawl View Post
    My guess is that the developers accidentally added an extra 8 to the intended income, making it 1548 instead of 154. They have 3 entire stacks of 20 units each so I can't really do much against them.
    You'd do well to post it on the official bug forums.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Apparently it's not just Garama, the town in Southern Algeria and another one in Southwestern Morocco also have a 1000+ income while major cities like Rome only have 330.

  6. #6
    2gutter67's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    289

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Maybe it's to represent the trade routes that went from the Mediterranean down through the Sahara? I can't say for certain but it's a possiblity.

    All I know for sure is that finding this thread quadroupled my drive to conquer those desert rats on my borders! (playing as Carthage btw)

  7. #7

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Nah, I almost guarantee it's a bug because the developers didn't check those areas (can't blame them, there's almost nothing there). Also the fact that they take Carthage in most hands-off games I've had reinforces this. I'm sadly not touching Carthage (which is my favorite faction) again until they fix this. It's not fun losing all my client-states every single game to the Numidians within 5 turns, then Carthage itself being besieged by 2 stacks of Numidians by turn 10. Also another annoying thing is when I subjugate a nation, but that nation is still at war with my client-states + they get an extra army when I subjugate them.

  8. #8
    Inevitability won
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    9,594

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Can someone compile a quick list of all provinces with outlandish income for me?

  9. #9
    Heinz Guderian's Avatar *takes off trousers
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    16,504

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Quote Originally Posted by .Mitch. View Post
    Can someone compile a quick list of all provinces with outlandish income for me?
    somebody do as Mitch says

  10. #10

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Those provinces SHOULD theoretically have a high income from the sub-saharan gold trade.

    Not THAT wealthy though lol
    The above post is in a pre-alpha state and does not nessecarily reflect the final writings of the poster. As such the poster cannot be held responsible for any statements made in this post.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    I'd say 548 is a good income if you include the sub-Saharan gold trade since Rome has 330, but 1548? And it's not just Garamantia, it's every single Numidian town south of the North African coastline.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    like was said here, seems a trend on TW games such regions always had high income. but if i'm not wrong, doesnt that region have a trade thing? but even so is too high, when playing as carthage they steamrolled libya xD
    Common sense removed due being Disruptive.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Look, Mali in 272bc didn't exist. The gold trade was negligible and at most the trade with sub-Saharan tuareg tribes should amount to 50 income (50 income is a lot in this game, look at how much income buildings give). I think those Sub-Saharan Numidians are more than well economically with their 2500 base income, so additionally they could get 50-80 from their oasis outposts. That 2500 would serve to maintain their Numidian army + make a few troops.

  14. #14
    Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    426

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    So has anyone figured out how to fix this? Or what is causing the inflated income?

  15. #15

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    I wondered why the start of my Normal difficulty Carthage campaign was pretty difficult. I was like Damn, these desert tribes are no joke... I pulled all my forces out of southern Italy completely stopping my invasion of Rome in order to fend off African tribes.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    There is no reason why Roma or Carthage should make less than them. Especially Carthage.

    Quote Originally Posted by Condottiere 40K View Post
    If you ever lived next to a volcano, the fact that you had nothing to do with your neighbour failing to properly throw in his virgin daughter to appease the local deity doesn't stop the lava from engulfing your home.

  17. #17
    GussieFinkNottle's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    2,239

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Am I the only one who likes this? Now I know where I can find a decent source of income to help my economy which is limping along at 5000 income, not enough even for building conversions in conquered provinces. I miss the wealthy days of Rome 1 where you could have building in every town and still turn a profit (due to the sack/loot town mechanic not being completely unusable.
    A home without books is a body without soul - Marcus Tullius Cicero

    If you rep me, please leave your name. Thx

  18. #18
    Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    426

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    How can you like it when it completely unbalances the factions and results in Carthage getting wiped out every damn campaign and the North African factions taking over?

  19. #19
    GussieFinkNottle's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    2,239

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Quote Originally Posted by AzureNight View Post
    How can you like it when it completely unbalances the factions and results in Carthage getting wiped out every damn campaign and the North African factions taking over?
    Carthage and its vassals are standing firm on my campaign
    A home without books is a body without soul - Marcus Tullius Cicero

    If you rep me, please leave your name. Thx

  20. #20

    Default Re: Garama (city in southern Libya) gives 1548 income, is this intended?

    Now THIS is the reason why I always see Carthage wiped out by the Garamantians... understand.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •