Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Flaming Arrows, or not?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Flaming Arrows, or not?

    I know that flaming arrows were used to lower morale in the Rome1, has anyone heard anything about flaming arrows in Rome2? What are the pros and cons of using them?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Flaming Arrows, or not?

    There was a video of naval warfare where some archers were firing flame arrows towards an enemy ship, so yeah, they'll be back.
    Effects will probably be less accurate, but more damage and lowering morale. Against ships it can also set them on fire.

  3. #3
    DogSoldierSPQR's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Birmingham, England.
    Posts
    1,256

    Default Re: Flaming Arrows, or not?

    I think fire arrows will be annoying this time around. If you looked at the Teutoberg gameplay, you saw the Romans defend successfully against regular arrows but drop like flies from fire arrows. In reality, fire arrows are really unreliable and all that stuff that is flammable at the front of the arrow will limit it's penetration drastically. Also, it's a bigger weight at the end of the arrow which means it'll be less accurate and not travel as far as well. However, fire arrows have a purpose in this game and will be in. I personally wouldn't want them in.
    I personally invite you to check out my complete combat overhaul which will give you a completely new Rome 2 experience:
    (http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...ere!-(26-10-13)
    If you rep me, leave that beautiful name of yours so I know who you are
    That a salesperson at my door? Where my Gladius at??
    An empire always fails because it never sees the potential in the individual. The smaller state never fails because it has no choice but to... - DogSoldierSPQR

  4. #4
    Dude with the Food's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Round the Corner.
    Posts
    1,800

    Default Re: Flaming Arrows, or not?

    Then don't use them. On the plus side, it looks as if they are a general tactic as opposed to timer abilities.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I am me. You are not me. You are you. If I was you, I wouldn't be me.
    If you were me, I'd be sad.But I wouldn't then be me because you'd be me so you wouldn't be me because I wasn't me because you were me but you couldn't be because I'd be a different me. I'd rather be any kind of bird (apart from a goose) than be you because to be you I'd have to not be me which I couldn't do unless someone else was me but then they would be you aswell so there would still be no me. They would be you because I was you so to restore balance you would have to be me and them meaning all three of us would become one continously the same. That would be very bad.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •