Billy Boy 4 - The Total War Contribution Act.

[Belisarius]

I want the following added to the Appendix where all the requirments are -

VIII - Contribution to the Total War Community

1. Contributions of Content such as articles, strategies and other general helpful information.
2. Dedication to the Total War Community and its improvement
3. Any other exeptional contribution towards the Total War Community

ANyone want to improve it, feel free.

[Silver Guard]

VIII - Contribution to the Total War Community

1. Repeated Contributions of Content such as articles, strategies and other general helpful information.

The other two are too vague and should be things that need to be there before a Patrician can be voted in, not the additional qualifications, like good posting for example, which is also not there

[King Henry V]

VIII - Contribution to the Total War Community

1. Repeated Contributions of Content such as articles, strategies and other general helpful information.

The other two are too vague and should be things that need to be there before a Patrician can be voted in, not the additional qualifications, like good posting for example, which is also not there

I agree with this version of the bill.

[Belisarius]

VIII - Contribution to the Total War Community

1. Repeated Contributions of Content such as articles, strategies and other general helpful information.

The other two are too vague and should be things that need to be there before a Patrician can be voted in, not the additional qualifications, like good posting for example, which is also not there

Yup I'll go with this, how do we get votes started these days?

[rez]

Dedication is rather objective.

Wheras the contribution of articles are solid amounts of work we can see and masterbate over.

Besides surely if someone is dedicated that is proven by contributions of information and strategies.

2 and 1 are too linked to be seperate suggestions in my opinion.

...haven't been in here for a while.

[Perikles]

VI. Total War Contributions

1. Modding Tutorials
2. Modding Tools
3. Open Source Modification

What is wrong with these criteria which are already in the Syntagma?

Firstly, the last line of:

Any other contribution, as Defined by the Senior Staff and CdeC, meriting consideration for Patricianship

Was in my opinion created so that we would not need to continually update the Appendix. Your 2nd and 3rd points come under that, as does your 1st point but that could also come under 'Modding Tutorials' in a way, although I suppose strategies don't come under that they definitely come under the line above...

In editing the Appenix you set precedent of having to continually edit it for every new Contribution that appears, when we could just say they come under the last line.

[Belisarius]

Its not enough JP - Note Modding tools

The TW community needs some love too. Remember now we have the TW community, the Modding community and the CC.

[Muizer]

I agree the broader category of "contributions to the TW section" should be included explicitly and some examples provided.
IMHO the other two points are a bit too vague to be of use to either the CdeC or the civitates.

[Tom Paine]

3 days, then PM the Curator.

[Hader]

Me likey, I will go with this

[Belisarius]

I want this moved to vote please.

[imb39]

The vote is up and can be found here.