of the many disapointment , if you could ask jus one thing to be changed what would it be?

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Its no news that now after the new informations gived about the game I am totally disapointed , ...

from the Black Caesar to the unsiegeability of a quarter of the city maps ... frome 1tpy to gameplay of arcade ature ...

but having to choose just one single feature that CA could change as fans would like ... I would ask the siegeability of cities ... that of the many disapointments is the biggest one to me .

• make all cities siegeable ...

perhaps all rest could be fixed ...






( but really what sense have making Caesar a blak skinned man ? Why not Arminius then ? )

[Dan113112]

Two things. I want more settlements on the Med and I want them to reduce the crazy animations they have in the game so far.

[He111]

acardish battles.

[=Vastator=]

acardish battles.

THis

[Barbarian Nobility]

If i had to choose, it would be some sort of block feature for TWC wherein anyone posting whiney pointless threads doesnt appear in my forum.

[Pajkes]

If i had to choose, it would be some sort of block feature for TWC wherein anyone posting whiney pointless threads doesnt appear in my forum.

So being critical is a bad thing cause we just have to accept that although many improvements could be done easily and would appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers , they simply won't be done cause some 'genius' in PR department thinks otherwise.Or CA simply doesn't care at all ?

Well let's just talk about unit cards.If casuals won't care and it bothers the hardcore part of your audience and only handfull of people actually like it than why should I have to get used to it when it can be easily changed.And don't me start about bowling total war as someone said before.Jack is demo tweaked at all or we can actually build nuclear power plants for producing those nukes Eguptians used ?

[GrudgeNL]

So being critical is a bad thing cause we just have to accept that although many improvements could be done easily and would appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers , they simply won't be done cause some 'genius' in PR department thinks otherwise.Or CA simply doesn't care at all ?

Well let's just talk about unit cards.If casuals won't care and it bothers the hardcore part of your audience and only handfull of people actually like it than why should I have to get used to it when it can be easily changed.And don't me start about bowling total war as someone said before.Jack is demo tweaked at all or we can actually build nuclear power plants for producing those nukes Eguptians used ?

Being critical is one thing. Spamming the same complaints over and over again in new threads when CA explained their descisions multiple times is just pointless whining. Jack Lusted even directly replied to PROM in his latest spam comment trying to explain CA's descisions. He just plain ignored it and started this thread. It's just sad, really.

CA does care. However, they are in the end the one making descisions, not us. Also, If I like the unit cards does that make me a casual gamer? Stop using words you cannot even begin to comprehend.

[Barbarian Nobility]

So being critical is a bad thing cause we just have to accept that although many improvements could be done easily and would appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers , they simply won't be done cause some 'genius' in PR department thinks otherwise.Or CA simply doesn't care at all ?

Well let's just talk about unit cards.If casuals won't care and it bothers the hardcore part of your audience and only handfull of people actually like it than why should I have to get used to it when it can be easily changed.And don't me start about bowling total war as someone said before.Jack is demo tweaked at all or we can actually build nuclear power plants for producing those nukes Eguptians used ?

This is all I hear right now


You see when grown ups dont like something as incidental as a video game, they either dont purchase it, or they simply ignore the aspects that dont particularly appeal to them. But on TWC it seems every goddam second post is someone having a cry over sandals or scythed chariots or pieces of the map and so on and so forth, its draining.

I come here to get excited about the release of the new total war game and find out all the latest info, but it seems a fair whack of TWC's membership comes to post pointless drivel on the internet. If you dont like it, go do something else.

[Raiven]

So being critical is a bad thing cause we just have to accept that although many improvements could be done easily and would appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers , they simply won't be done cause some 'genius' in PR department thinks otherwise.Or CA simply doesn't care at all ?

Well let's just talk about unit cards.If casuals won't care and it bothers the hardcore part of your audience and only handfull of people actually like it than why should I have to get used to it when it can be easily changed.And don't me start about bowling total war as someone said before.Jack is demo tweaked at all or we can actually build nuclear power plants for producing those nukes Eguptians used ?

Being critical is not bad, expressing your opinion positive or negative is not bad. But this guy is not critical, he just spams his complaints over and over again. I will soon know his complaints better than my own. I believe even Jack is sick of them right now, by answering them for 10th time. And believe it ore not, it is annoying that some more interesting questions stay unanswered this way.

How many companies come so far in communication with their consumers than CA has done. I would not be surprised that after the attitude "fans" have shown in these forums we will get nothing when comes time for next TW game.

[Clock]

So being critical is a bad thing cause we just have to accept that although many improvements could be done easily and would appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers , they simply won't be done cause some 'genius' in PR department thinks otherwise.Or CA simply doesn't care at all ?

Nothing wrong with being critical, but repeatedly spreading false information? I've seen him post in at least three threads that Rome 2 will have NO sieges for example. It's ridiculous hyperbole. Yet when people point out how incorrect this is, Prom sadly claims he is the victim of fanboys/casuals/kids (take your pick) and opens another thread.

CA have even addressed his posts directly several times, yet he simply ignores the responses and creates new threads repeating the same things, over and over. Several times I've seen decent threads derailed and then locked due to Prom, usually with his 1TPY crusade. People are understandably going to get sick of it eventually. At this point they should really just sticky a 'Prom's complaints thread' for him to rage in personally to keep the forum free from all these bloody repeated threads.

[pericles_plato]

The black ceasar will be ironed out. Do you not accept it why?
http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/06/12/to...ga-booth-tour/ It's in Alpha this article even says so. Actually, it might be beta. It is still be ironed out.

The unit cards are the only thing I will change so far, but I expect I will grow use to it.

[Little Legionaire]

Arcade battle animations!
Arcade battle animations!
Arcade battle animations!
Arcade battle animations!

[Gugg]

Prom you have been told time and time again that the legionaries (Caesar included) is not black, they are merely tanned. As would make sense when living in Egypt. I will ask everybody to give up on trying to convince this guy. Because some people have convinced themselves that this game is BAD, and not matter what you say he will not change his opinion. Just like when Jack Lusted said that the legionaries are not black, but tanned. And here he is complaining about the fact that they're black. My point is proved. He's always complaining about the number of siegeable cities, even when he's been told many, many times why he doesn't have something to complain about.

Give up people. Just give up.

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Prom you have been told time and time again that the legionaries (Caesar included) is not black, they are merely tanned. As would make sense when living in Egypt. I will ask everybody to give up on trying to convince this guy. Because some people have convinced themselves that this game is BAD, and not matter what you say he will not change his opinion. Just like when Jack Lusted said that the legionaries are not black, but tanned. And here he is complaining about the fact that they're black. My point is proved. He's always complaining about the number of siegeable cities, even when he's been told many, many times why he doesn't have something to complain about.

Give up people. Just give up.

1 Caesar was white according to Svetonius and as all Romans were .

2 He was not living in Egypt

3 The native army ( the oneis facing caesar is clearly white

4 The skin tone is not of a tanned man but of a black man

5 Jack can come in and say that the red is blue , and some people woudl believe since he said? Romans were not black but white! and that color is not a tanned one Its simply wrong .

[Barbarian Nobility]

Jack can come in and say that the red is blue , and some people woudl believe since he said? Romans were not black but white! and that color is not a tanned one Its simply wrong .

DASS RACSIST

I hope CA will add dark skinned legions only, more explosions, 1TP3Y, more flying soldiers and no sieges. Just to see prom's reaction.

^This is what I want

[skofuz]

I'm also bothered by how unbelievably "tan" Caesar is, and the unit cards don't look good so I will be looking for a mod for those. Apart from that I'm very happy with what I've seen so far, can't wait!

[Gugg]

1 Caesar was white according to Svetonius and as all Romans were .

2 He was not living in Egypt

3 The native army ( the oneis facing caesar is clearly white

4 The skin tone is not of a tanned man but of a black man

5 Jack can come in and say that the red is blue , and some people woudl believe since he said? Romans were not black but white! and that color is not a tanned one Its simply wrong .

Then you know what buddy? I got an idea that will solve ALL your problems with this game. You clearly cannot stand looking at it, and clearly have nothing positive to to say about the game. So here's something that will solve that.

Ehem. Don't buy the game! It's a miracle and now all your problems are solved.

If I would have to answer your question though, I'd say unit sizes could be bigger, but hey! I'm fine with whatever.

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Then you know what buddy? I got an idea that will solve ALL your problems with this game. You clearly cannot stand looking at it, and clearly have nothing positive to to say about the game. So here's something that will solve that.

Ehem. Don't buy the game! It's a miracle and now all your problems are solved.

If I would have to answer your question though, I'd say unit sizes could be bigger, but hey! I'm fine with whatever.

The forum is a place where to voice the opinions on the game .

they show use bits of it and give us informations about it for what? beeing told how cool is it and how great the game is all the time with 0 criticizm?

If I was creating something I woudl like people to criticize my work in order to make it better and better ... if I have just to collect praises it would be just useless ...

Also I have already stated many times the things I like of the game , but those of course are not noticed by people because do not rise any debate .

While instead complains about something are usefull because rise a point and an argument of discussion , and in some cases it reach incredible heigths of disaproval by vast majorities of people like the following threew arguments :


1 One turn per year
2 1/4 of cities siegeable
3 Arcade gameplay

[pericles_plato]

The forum is a place where to voice the opinions on the game .

they show use bits of it and give us informations about it for what? beeing told how cool is it and how great the game is all the time with 0 criticizm?

If I was creating something I woudl like people to criticize my work in order to make it better and better ... if I have just to collect praises it would be just useless ...

Also I have already stated many times the things I like of the game , but those of course are not noticed by people because do not rise any debate .

While instead complains about something are usefull because rise a point and an argument of discussion , and in some cases it reach incredible heigths of disaproval by vast majorities of people like the following threew arguments :


1 One turn per year
2 1/4 of cities siegeable
3 Arcade gameplay

I will give you that you, got Jack Lusted to post, but I wish it was in better circumstances. Criticism is good, but not a lot. One has to earn when too much is too much. But by God let the people who want to have a praise thread have a praise thread. There are too many criticism threads. Too many. We need one, one that will not close because someone needs to criticise. There are many threads for that. You and other heavy heavy critics need not post. We look at all the other threads, trust me.

Jack lusted quote"There are sieges. There are forts. There are deployable defences"

[Huberto]

1 One turn per year
2 1/4 of cities siegeable Lack of key regions on map
3 Arcade gameplay