Before you read, this is an "I don't understand" thread rather than a "you got it wrong" thread.
After reading Candelarius' (and others) "ultimate guide to playing RTR historically", I was left wondering about the in-game sizes of the pre-reform legions. From what I've read (internet + Adrian Goldsworthy's "The Complete Roman Army") the size of the Roman part of an early region was around 4200 men (not including cavalry), and was accompanied by a similar number of allies. As stated in the above guide, this would put 1 "RTR man" = 10 "real men", making a standard legion a half-stack.
However, after the reforms a legion numbered around 4800 men (not including cavalry) plus maybe a few auxilia units. The army list in Candelarius' guide has this as ten units of men (9 normal + 1 first cohort) which is a ratio of 1 "RTR man" = 3 "real men". So after the reforms, a legion is larger than the pre-reform double legion (in game terms) when it should be similar in size.
Are these differences because a full stack (~16 units) "legion" is unreasonably powerful in the early game, but in the mid-late game a 6 unit "legion" is too weak (hence the size change)?
Would it be reasonable to double the number of units in the early legion, but reduce the sizes from 160 to 120 men (80 to 60 for the triarii), and then keep the post-reform legion the same? (thus changing the ratio from 1:10 to 1:5)
Or reduce the post-reform legions similarly (changing the ratio from 1:3 to 1:4)
I find the small number of units in the current early legion to be a bit limiting sometimes, so more units would be better, even if they had fewer men.
Any thoughts or comments on the matter would be greatly appreciated. I'm considering doing a roman aar when PE1.7 comes out, and I want to be sure i have everything "right" before i start :hmmm:




Reply With Quote








