View Poll Results: Your favorite for historical battle

Voters
60. You may not vote on this poll
  • Carrhae

    13 21.67%
  • Pydna

    1 1.67%
  • Ipsus

    6 10.00%
  • Gaugamela

    17 28.33%
  • Marathon

    7 11.67%
  • Cynoscephalae

    3 5.00%
  • Actium

    8 13.33%
  • Siler River

    1 1.67%
  • Pharsalus

    2 3.33%
  • Salamis

    2 3.33%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 54

Thread: Historical Conflicts

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Historical Conflicts

    So i was just wondering what other historical battles they will add to Rome 2. I'm a little bit more excited about them because of how cool and goal oriented they seem to be. I know alot of players really dont do them but i was wondering witch battles would intrest you most to play. We already have the sige of carthage and tuetonberg. This is a list of ideas for battles they could add.
    http://listverse.com/2008/07/31/10-m...cient-battles/
    10. Carrhae
    53BC

    The Battle of Carrhae in 53 BC was a decisive victory for the Parthian Spahbod Surena (try saying that 10 times fast!) over the Roman general Crassus near the town of Carrhae (now the present-day ruins of Harran, Turkey). A Parthian force of 1,000 cataphracts and 9,000 horse archers under general Surena met the Romans at Carrhae. Crassus’ cavalry was screening ahead of the main force when they were engaged by the cataphracts, and the weapons his cavalry employed were not capable of piercing the cataphracts armor. His cavalry was soon surrounded and routed, and his son Publius killed. Rome was humiliated by this defeat, and this was made even worse by the fact that the Parthians had captured several Legionary Eagles. It is also mentioned by Plutarch that the Parthians found the Roman prisoner of war that resembled Crassus the most, dressed him as a woman and paraded him through Parthia for all to see. The capture of the golden Aquilae (legionary battle standards) by the Parthians was considered a grave moral defeat and evil omen for the Romans. It required a generation of diplomacy before the Parthians returned them. An important and unexpected implication of this battle was that it opened up the European continent to a new and beautiful material: silk. However, the most immediate effect of the battle was that Carrhae was an indirect cause for the fall of the Republic, and the rise of the Empire.

    9. Pydna
    168 BC

    The Battle of Pydna in 168 BC between Rome and the Macedonian Antigonid dynasty represents the ascendancy of Rome in the Hellenic/Hellenistic world and the end of the Antigonid line of kings, whose power traced back to Alexander III of Macedon. It is often considered to be the classic example of the Macedonian phalanx against the Roman legion, and generally accepted as proving the superiority of the latter over the former. This was not the final conflict between the two rivals, but it broke the back of Macedonian power. The political consequences of the lost battle were severe. The Senate’s settlement included the deportation of all the royal officials and the permanent house arrest of Perseus. The kingdom was divided into four republics that were heavily restricted from intercourse or trade with one another and with Greece. There was a ruthless purge, with allegedly anti-Roman citizens being denounced by their compatriots and deported in large numbers (300 000).

    8.Ipsus
    301 BC

    The Battle of Ipsus was fought between some of the Diadochi (the successors of Alexander the Great) in 301 BC near the village of that name in Phrygia. Antigonus I Monophthalmus and his son Demetrius I of Macedon were pitted against the coalition of three other companions of Alexander: Cassander, ruler of Macedon; Lysimachus, ruler of Thrace; and Seleucus I Nicator, ruler of Babylonia and Persia. The battle opened with the usual slowly intensifying skirmishing between the two armies’ light troops, with elephants eventually thrown into the fray by both sides. Efforts were made by both sides to hamstring the enemy’s elephants, but also had to hang back to protect their own. Demetrius’ superior right-flank cavalry drove Antiochus’ wing back, but was halted in his attempted rear blow by Seleucus, who moved the elephant reserve to block him. More missile troops moved to the unprotected Antigonid right flank, as Demetrius was unable to disengage from the elephants and enemy horse to his front. At the beginning of the day, Antigonus had not been able to wear plate armor; this disadvantage was unexpectedly used by an anonymous allied peltast, who killed him with a well-thrown javelin. Without leadership and already beginning to flee, the Antigonid army completely disintegrated. The last chance to reunite the Alexandrine Empire had now passed. Antigonus had been the only general able to consistently defeat the other Successors; without him, the last bonds the Empire had had began to dissolve. Ipsus finalized the breakup of an empire, which may account for its obscurity; despite that, it was still a critical battle in classical history and decided the character of the Hellenistic age.

    7.Guagamala
    331 BC

    The Battle of Gaugamela took place in 331 BC between Alexander the Great of Macedonia and Darius III of Achaemenid Persia. The battle, which is also inaccurately called the Battle of Arbela, resulted in a massive victory for the Macedonians. While Darius had a significant advantage in numbers, most of his troops were of a lower quality than Alexander’s. Alexander’s pezhetairoi were armed with a six-meter spear, the sarissa. The main Persian infantry was poorly trained and equipped in comparison to Alexander’s pezhetairoi and hoplites. After the battle, Parmenion rounded up the Persian baggage train while Alexander and his own bodyguard chased after Darius in hopes of catching up. As at Issus, substantial amounts of loot were gained following the battle, with 4,000 talents captured, as well as the King’s personal chariot and bow. The war elephants were also captured. In all, it was a disastrous defeat for the Persians, and possibly one of Alexander’s finest victories. At this point, the Persian Empire was divided into two halves – East and West. Bessus murdered Darius, before fleeing eastwards. Alexander would pursue Bessus, eventually capturing and executing him the following year. The majority of the existing satraps were to give their loyalty to Alexander, and be allowed to keep their positions, however, the Persian Empire is traditionally considered to have fallen with the death of Darius.

    6. Marathon
    490 BC


    The Battle of Marathon during the Greco-Persian Wars took place in 490 BC and was the culmination of King Darius I of Persia’s first full scale attempt to conquer the remainder of Greece and incorporate it into the Persian Empire, which would secure the weakest portion of his western border. The longest-lasting legacy of Marathon was the double envelopment. Some historians have claimed it was random rather than a conscious decision by Miltiades – the Tyrant of the Greek Colonies. In hoplitic battles, the two sides were usually stronger than the center because either they were the weakest point (right side) or the strongest point (left side). However, before Miltiades (and after him until Epaminondas), this was only a matter of quality, not quantity. Miltiades had personal experience from the Persian army and knew its weaknesses. As his course of action after the battle shows (invasions of the Cyclades islands), he had an integrated strategy upon defeating the Persians, hence there is no reason he could have not thought of a good tactic. The double envelopment has been used ever since, such as when the German Army used a tactic at the battle of Tannenberg during World War I similar to that used by the Greeks at Marathon.

    5.Cynoscephalae
    197 BC


    The Battle of Cynoscephalae was fought in Thessaly in 197 BC between the Roman army, led by Titus Quinctius Flamininus, and the Antigonid dynasty of Macedon, led by Philip V. This Macedonian defeat marks the passing of imperial power from the successors of Alexander the Great to Rome. Along with the later Battle of Pydna, this defeat is often held to have demonstrated that the Macedonian phalanx, formerly the most effective fighting unit in the ancient world, was now obsolete, although in fact the phalanx was able to force the legions back and held their own with swords until twenty maniples fell upon their rear (due to the weak Macedonian flanks and the Roman elephants routing the disordered Macedonian left flank). As a consequence of his loss, Philip had to pay 1,000 talents to Rome, as well as disband his navy and most of his army. He also had to send his son to Rome as a hostage. The battle in many ways determined the subsequent history of the Mediterranean. It also was a major turning point in how wars were fought. The image above is the site of the Battle of Cynoscephalae today.

    4. Actium
    31 BC


    The Battle of Actium was the decisive engagement in the Final War of the Roman Republic between the forces of Octavian and those of the combined forces of Mark Antony and Cleopatra. It was fought on September 2, 31 BC, on the Ionian Sea near the Roman colony of Actium in Greece. Octavian’s fleet was commanded by Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, while Antony’s fleet was supported by the fleet of his lover, Cleopatra VII, queen of Ptolemaic Egypt. The victory of Octavian’s fleet enabled him to consolidate his power over Rome and its domains, leading to his adoption of the title of Princeps (“first citizen”) and his accepting the title of Augustus from the Senate. As Augustus Caesar, he would preserve the trappings of a restored Republic, but many historians view his consolidation of power and the adoption of his honorifics flowing from his victory at Actium as the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire. The political consequences of this sea battle were far-reaching. As a result of the loss of his fleet, Mark Antony’s army, which had begun as equal to that of Octavian’s, deserted in large numbers. In a communication breakdown, Antony came to believe that Cleopatra had been captured, and so he committed suicide. Cleopatra heard the news about Mark Antony and, rather than risk being captured by Octavian, committed suicide herself, on August 12, 30 BC. She allowed herself to be bitten by a poisonous asp that was reportedly hidden for her in a basket of figs.

    3. Siler River
    73 BC


    The Third Servile War, also called the Gladiator War, The Battle of Siler River, and The War of Spartacus by Plutarch, was the last of a series of unrelated and unsuccessful slave rebellions against the Roman Republic, known collectively as the Servile Wars. The Third Servile War was the only one to directly threaten the Roman heartland of Italia and was doubly alarming to the Roman people due to the repeated successes of the rapidly growing band of rebel slaves against the Roman army between 73 and 71 BC. The rebellion was finally crushed through the concentrated military effort of a single commander, Marcus Licinius Crassus, although the rebellion continued to have indirect effects on Roman politics for years to come. The Third Servile War was significant to the broader history of ancient Rome mostly in its effect on the careers of Pompey and Crassus. The two generals used their success in putting down the rebellion to further their political careers, using their public acclaim and the implied threat of their legions to sway the consular elections of 70 BC in their favor. Their actions as Consuls greatly furthered the subversion of Roman political institutions and contributed to the eventual transition of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire.

    2. Pharsalus
    48 BC


    The Battle of Pharsalus was a decisive battle of Caesar’s Civil War. On August 9, 48 BC, the battle was fought at Pharsalus in central Greece between forces of the Populares faction and forces of the Optimates faction. Both factions field armies from the Roman Republic. The Populares were led by Gaius Julius Caesar (Caesar) and the Optimates were led by Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (Pompey). In addition to Pompey, the Optimates faction included most of the Roman Senate. The victory of Caesar weakened the Senatorial forces and solidified his control over the Republic. Pompey fled from Pharsalus to Egypt, where he was assassinated on the order of Pharaoh Ptolemy XIII. The Battle of Pharsalus ended the wars of the First Triumvirate. The Roman Civil War, however, was not ended. Pompey’s two sons, the most important of whom was Sextus Pompeius, and the Pompeian faction led now by Labienus, survived and fought their cause in the name of Pompey the Great. Caesar spent the next few years ‘mopping up’ remnants of the senatorial faction. After finally completing this task, he was assassinated in a conspiracy arranged by Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus.

    1.Salamis
    480 BC


    The Battle of Salamis, was a decisive naval battle between the Greek city-states and Persia in September, 480 BC in the strait between Piraeus and Salamis Island, an island in the Saronic Gulf near Athens. The Greeks were not in accord as to how to defend against the Persian army, but Athens under Themistocles used their navy to defeat the much larger Persian navy and force King Xerxes I of Persia to retreat. The Greek victory marked the turning point of the campaign, leading to the eventual Persian defeat. The Battle of Salamis has been described by many historians as the single most significant battle in human history. The defeat of the Persian navy was instrumental in the eventual Persian defeat, as it dramatically shifted the war in Greece’s favor. Many historians argue that Greece’s ensuing independence laid the foundations for Western civilization, most notably from the preservation of Athenian democracy, the concept of individual rights, relative freedom of the person, true philosophy, art and architecture. Had the Persians won at Salamis, it is very likely that Xerxes would have succeeded in conquering all the Greek nations and passing to the European continent, thus preventing Western civilization’s growth (and even existence). Given the influence of Western civilization on world history, as well as the achievements of Western culture itself, a failure of the Greeks to win at Salamis would almost certainly have had seriously important effects on the course of human history


    Now I know some of these arnt in Rome 2 time period, but maybe CA will spoil us

    Whats your favorite? Or do you have something better?
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  2. #2
    Gugg's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    438

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    This reminded me! OMG yes! Finally historical sea battles! It's going to be so freaking epic!

    Awesome that more people know about listverse. It's an awesome site! +Rep for that.

  3. #3
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    i literally almost forgot about sea battles until i made this. Not many people seem too interested in fighting with ancient navies.
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    The battles of Marathon, Salamis and Gaugamela are irrelevant to Rome II.

  5. #5
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by Shamshir View Post
    The battles of Marathon, Salamis and Gaugamela are irrelevant to Rome II.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sun Jetzu View Post
    Now I know some of these arnt in Rome 2 time period, but maybe CA will spoil us
    Already stated
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  6. #6

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Didn't bother to read the whole OP, TBH.

  7. #7
    Gugg's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    438

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by Shamshir View Post
    Didn't bother to read the whole OP, TBH.
    This is funny.

  8. #8
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by Gugg View Post
    This is funny.
    he should read the whole thing before posting, that way he avoids confusion in the future
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  9. #9

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Amazing. I will destroy the whole world with the glory of the Roman Empire! History will be rewritten.

  10. #10
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by theDaedricPrince View Post
    Amazing. I will destroy the whole world with the glory of the Roman Empire! History will be rewritten.
    Even go back in time and assist the greeks at Marathon and have them offer you a gift of earth and water!
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  11. #11

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    This is the list of all the possible battles in Rome II. *originally i made it in another thread, but this seem appropiate XD!*

    CA should add more Historical Battles on Rome II than any previous game. Simply put, after Medieval 2, CA has gone lazy in adding a good number of historical battles.

    To be honest i didn't play historical battles on Empire *i'm not even sure if Empire had historical battles* and Napoleon. Shogun 2 made me like historical battles again, but they were too few to actually enjoy it.

    This is the list of battles Rome II should have.

    275 BC Battle of Beneventum. Probably this will be on the tutorial campaign. I think Rome II tutorial Campaign will be the Phyrric War.

    258 BC Battle of Cos. A naval battle between Macedonians and Ptolemaics. *Ptolemaics will be playable most likely and also I would really hate it if all the historical battles are Rome against someone. That's boring.*

    256 BC Battle of Cape Ecnomus. Punic War, Carthaginians vs Romans. Probably the battle that introduced the Corvus. Enough said...

    241 BC The Aegates Islands. The decisive battle of the first Punic War. It would be stupid not to add it.

    225 BC Battle of Faesulae. Romans vs Gauls. And a defeat for Rome, enough to add it.

    218 BC The Rhone Crossing. Carthage vs Gauls. Sounds like an interesting scenario + Elephants!

    218 BC Battle of Trebia. It was on the original Rome, so it should be on Rome II

    217 BC Lake Trasimene. Another battle that was on Rome

    216 BC The Battle of Cannae. This one is legendary.

    215 BC The Siege of Syracuse. A naval landing siege battle + floating siege towers + Archimedes trolling with his inventions. This one should be in. It's epic just imagining it.

    209 BC The Battle of Lamia. Macedon vs a mixed force of greeks and romans. Sounds pretty cool.

    202 BC The Battle of Zama. Scipio Africanus vs Hannibal. This one is just legendary.

    191 BC The Battle of Thermopylae. Romans vs Seleucids, fighting on a legendary place. *this one will only happen if the Seleucids are playable though.*

    190 BC Battle of Magnesia. The decisive battle between Romans and Seleucids. *Again, depends if Seleucids are playable.

    148 BC Battle of Pydna. Rome vs Macedon. Another decisive battle

    146 BC Siege of Carthage. This one is already confirmed to be in the game

    129 BC Battle of Ecbatana. Seleucids vs Parthians, whoever wins will be the ruling power in Mesopotamia for the next decades. Historically this battle marks the rise of Parthians as a power and the decline of the Seleucids.

    105 BC Battle of Arausio. Roman vs Germans, another crushing defeat for Rome.

    102 BC Aqua Sextae. The marian legionary cohorts appear!

    101 BC Vercellae. A massacre!

    58 BC Battle of Vosges. Caesar vs the Suebi. Sounds like a Teutoburg Forest gone right!

    53 BC Battle of Cahrrae. It was in the original Rome, plus it was hard as hell.

    52 BC Battle of Gergovia. Caesar vs Vercingetorix! Plus a gallic victory to add in. Must be in game.

    52 BC Siege of Alesia. This one should be in the game. It's way to famous to not be in.

    47 BC Battle of the Nile. Rome vs Egypt.

    47 BC Battle of Zela. Vini, Vidi, Vici...

    46 BC Battle of Thapsus. Rome vs Rome...sounds epic.

    42 BC Battle of Philippi. Rome vs Rome again, but even more epic.

    31 BC Battle of Actium. One of the most famous naval battles of history.

    9 AD Battle of Teutoburg Forest. Already confirmed to be in game.

    16 AD Battle of Weser River. Roman retaliation!

    43 AD Battle of Medway. The invasion of Britain begins.

    61 AD Battle of Watling Street. Boudica, This is the sole reason the Iceni were made playable. So CA would slap us in the face if they dont add it to the historical battles.

    66 AD Battle of Beth Horon. Rome vs Rebels *yeah rebels, to remember the old times when 80% of the map was filled with rebels.* Worst roman defeat to rebels.

    70 AD Siege of Jerusalem. I don't think CA will put it due to religious issues and all that BS, but i think they should.

    I think the siege of Jerusalem is probably the last major battle in the time frame Rome II will cover. Plus laying siege to a historical city, means lots of cool stuff to see.

    Of course, i'm sure i missed a lot of battles. But i tried just putting the ones i consider the most important ones. And even then, its a -ton of battles. So i dont think CA will add all of them. They should though, all of this battles were important.

  12. #12
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcani 4 Ever View Post
    This is the list of all the possible battles in Rome II. *originally i made it in another thread, but this seem appropiate XD!*

    CA should add more Historical Battles on Rome II than any previous game. Simply put, after Medieval 2, CA has gone lazy in adding a good number of historical battles.

    To be honest i didn't play historical battles on Empire *i'm not even sure if Empire had historical battles* and Napoleon. Shogun 2 made me like historical battles again, but they were too few to actually enjoy it.

    This is the list of battles Rome II should have.

    275 BC Battle of Beneventum. Probably this will be on the tutorial campaign. I think Rome II tutorial Campaign will be the Phyrric War.

    258 BC Battle of Cos. A naval battle between Macedonians and Ptolemaics. *Ptolemaics will be playable most likely and also I would really hate it if all the historical battles are Rome against someone. That's boring.*

    256 BC Battle of Cape Ecnomus. Punic War, Carthaginians vs Romans. Probably the battle that introduced the Corvus. Enough said...

    241 BC The Aegates Islands. The decisive battle of the first Punic War. It would be stupid not to add it.

    225 BC Battle of Faesulae. Romans vs Gauls. And a defeat for Rome, enough to add it.

    218 BC The Rhone Crossing. Carthage vs Gauls. Sounds like an interesting scenario + Elephants!

    218 BC Battle of Trebia. It was on the original Rome, so it should be on Rome II

    217 BC Lake Trasimene. Another battle that was on Rome

    216 BC The Battle of Cannae. This one is legendary.

    215 BC The Siege of Syracuse. A naval landing siege battle + floating siege towers + Archimedes trolling with his inventions. This one should be in. It's epic just imagining it.

    209 BC The Battle of Lamia. Macedon vs a mixed force of greeks and romans. Sounds pretty cool.

    202 BC The Battle of Zama. Scipio Africanus vs Hannibal. This one is just legendary.

    191 BC The Battle of Thermopylae. Romans vs Seleucids, fighting on a legendary place. *this one will only happen if the Seleucids are playable though.*

    190 BC Battle of Magnesia. The decisive battle between Romans and Seleucids. *Again, depends if Seleucids are playable.

    148 BC Battle of Pydna. Rome vs Macedon. Another decisive battle

    146 BC Siege of Carthage. This one is already confirmed to be in the game

    129 BC Battle of Ecbatana. Seleucids vs Parthians, whoever wins will be the ruling power in Mesopotamia for the next decades. Historically this battle marks the rise of Parthians as a power and the decline of the Seleucids.

    105 BC Battle of Arausio. Roman vs Germans, another crushing defeat for Rome.

    102 BC Aqua Sextae. The marian legionary cohorts appear!

    101 BC Vercellae. A massacre!

    58 BC Battle of Vosges. Caesar vs the Suebi. Sounds like a Teutoburg Forest gone right!

    53 BC Battle of Cahrrae. It was in the original Rome, plus it was hard as hell.

    52 BC Battle of Gergovia. Caesar vs Vercingetorix! Plus a gallic victory to add in. Must be in game.

    52 BC Siege of Alesia. This one should be in the game. It's way to famous to not be in.

    47 BC Battle of the Nile. Rome vs Egypt.

    47 BC Battle of Zela. Vini, Vidi, Vici...

    46 BC Battle of Thapsus. Rome vs Rome...sounds epic.

    42 BC Battle of Philippi. Rome vs Rome again, but even more epic.

    31 BC Battle of Actium. One of the most famous naval battles of history.

    9 AD Battle of Teutoburg Forest. Already confirmed to be in game.

    16 AD Battle of Weser River. Roman retaliation!

    43 AD Battle of Medway. The invasion of Britain begins.

    61 AD Battle of Watling Street. Boudica, This is the sole reason the Iceni were made playable. So CA would slap us in the face if they dont add it to the historical battles.

    66 AD Battle of Beth Horon. Rome vs Rebels *yeah rebels, to remember the old times when 80% of the map was filled with rebels.* Worst roman defeat to rebels.

    70 AD Siege of Jerusalem. I don't think CA will put it due to religious issues and all that BS, but i think they should.

    I think the siege of Jerusalem is probably the last major battle in the time frame Rome II will cover. Plus laying siege to a historical city, means lots of cool stuff to see.

    Of course, i'm sure i missed a lot of battles. But i tried just putting the ones i consider the most important ones. And even then, its a -ton of battles. So i dont think CA will add all of them. They should though, all of this battles were important.
    Thanks for the ADD!!! i think your winning on suggestions for battles so far lol
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  13. #13
    Queen Annes Revenge's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    763

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    I'm mystified as to why Hannibal's battles are missing from this list, I figured Cannae would be the most popular choice of any classical era engagement.

  14. #14
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by Queen Annes Revenge View Post
    I'm mystified as to why Hannibal's battles are missing from this list, I figured Cannae would be the most popular choice of any classical era engagement.
    Hannibles double envelopment also mystified me as to why it didnt make the cut. But that is a great addition. only thing is the battle might not go like it did for hannible. I wonder what hannibles character would look like.
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  15. #15

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by Queen Annes Revenge View Post
    I'm mystified as to why Hannibal's battles are missing from this list, I figured Cannae would be the most popular choice of any classical era engagement.
    Because it probably can't work without a give ground order or unit mass working well. Historical battles in TW have always been disappointment so far though getting a bit better in Shogun 2 still underwhelming as most campaigns I run into more epic battles than the historical setups. NTW and Waterloo probably had the most interesting one so far even if the scale seemed way to small at least with fortification, map, and reinforcements it was a genuine attempt at recreation.

  16. #16
    Mausolos of Caria's Avatar Royal Satrap
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    County of Ravensberg
    Posts
    5,575

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    I voted for Ipsos - Demetrios Poliorkete's mad charge and Seleukos' clever elephant move make it very unique.
    "Pompeius, after having finished the war against Mithridates, when he went to call at the house of Poseidonios, the famous teacher of philosophy, forbade the lictor to knock at the door, as was the usual custom, and he, to whom both the eastern and the western world had yielded submission, ordered the fasces to be lowered before the door of science."

    Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia, 7, 112

  17. #17

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    At my opinion very few of the mentioned ones were decisive for anything ... I woudl clean the list of some that just got overrated and too much famous

    I woudl say that the decisive battle of Alexander was just the one that was fought in India couse set the end to his expansion ...

    so

    Gaugamela and Hydaspes

    For Greece

    the most decisive was probably

    Salamis and Marathon

    For Rome

    Usually is brought up teutoburgium and carrae , but those didn't make any difference or stopped Romans despite the germanic propaganda Romans continued to invade german lands even after and only decided to abandon after the emperor decided it was not worth the expenses , while Carrae was just the first clash of Romans versus Parthian and was led by an incompetent general , the siler river was hardly considered any decisive or major battle .

    but for Romans there are too many really just to make a small selection more or less from the timeframe of the game .

    I would say

    Cape Ecnomus
    Vercellae
    Cannae
    Zama
    Alesia
    Pharsalus
    Philippi
    Zela
    Pydna
    Maleventum
    Actium


    those battles actually caused a change in historical events course .... I could list for example all battles of Hannibal , but the decisive ones were Cannae and Zama in the end .

    ------CONAN TRAILER--------
    RomeII Realistic Heights mod
    Arcani
    I S S G A R D
    Creator of Ran no Jidai mod
    Creator of Res Gestae
    Original Creator of severall add ons on RTW from grass to textures and Roman Legions
    Oblivion Modder- DUNE creator
    Fallout 3 Modder
    2005-2006 Best modder , skinner , modeler awards winner.
    actually modding skyrim [/SIZE]

  18. #18
    Sun Jetzu's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Desert
    Posts
    2,569

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Quote Originally Posted by PROMETHEUS ts View Post
    I woudl say that the decisive battle of Alexander was just the one that was fought in India couse set the end to his expansion ...
    *Drool* yes, alexander crossing the river, fighting indian elephants and keeping a pinning force for the rest of the indian army across the river. defiently the stuff of legend
    One Punch Man Series VS My Hero Academia Series - Who's Better?

  19. #19
    |Sith|Galvanized Iron's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    I live in Kansas
    Posts
    4,710

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Must haves:
    Battle of Platae
    Battle of Guagemela
    Battle of Ipsus
    Battle of Raphia
    Siege of Rhodos

    Quote Originally Posted by PROMETHEUS ts View Post
    Carrae was just the first clash of Romans versus Parthian and was led by an incompetent general , the siler river was hardly considered any decisive or major battle.
    Crassus was not an incompetent general, he was actually the most competent man in the triumvirate, had he not died then it is unlikely that Caesar would ever have amounted to anything worth of mentioning. You are insulting a man who worked himself from humble origins into becoming the wealthiest man in Rome with the help of just his superior intellect. He was also the only man who was able to face and defeat the mighty Spartacus who previously had massacred legion after legion as if they were made of butter.

    Your grasp on history is truly shallow.
    Last edited by |Sith|Galvanized Iron; May 18, 2013 at 08:54 PM.
    Also responsible for the Roma Surrectum II Multiplayer mode
    Rest In Peace Colonel Muammar Gaddafi
    Forward to Victory Great Leader Assad!


  20. #20

    Default Re: Historical Conflicts

    Siege of Syracuse..Land and Naval..Nuff' Said

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •