Well folks, seems we have a little controversy raging as to the function of the mysterious 'arcani'. In the red corner, those who believe that CA's representation of them as a squadron of ninjaesque-warriors in Rome is grounded in historical evidence. In the blue corner, those who believe that they would be more properly represented, if at all, as a 'spy' agent on the campaign map.
Below is the only extant source which explicitly and definitely refers to this mysterious organisation. Try your hand at being an historian, read the source, and come to your own conclusion!
Were the Arcani more likely:"During these outstanding events the areani, who had gradually become corrupt, were removed by him [Theodosius] from their positions. This was an organization founded in early times, of which I have already said something in the history of Constans. It was clearly proved against them that they had been bribed with quantities of plunder, or promises of it, to reveal to the enemy from time to time what was happening on our side. Their official duty was to range backwards and forwards over long distances with information for our generals about disturbances among neighbouring nations." - Ammianus Marcellinus Liber XXVIII III VIII; A.D. 368 28, 3, 8.
'Soldiers'
Elite Roman soldiers who would lay ambushes behind enemy-lines during pitched battles.
'Spies'
Agents or informants of some kind whose duty was to range backwards and forwards over long distances with information for Roman generals about disturbances among neighbouring nations.
You decide!
![]()






Reply With Quote










