Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Commander:
    General George Gordon Meade

    Adjutants:

    Brigadier General Ulysses S. Grant
    Brigadier General Winfield Scott Hancock
    Major General Henry J. Hunt

    Units (These units MUST be paid for. Registered units have priority):

    69th New York Infantry Regiment - First Lieutenant James Whetton (Non-CO)
    20th Maine Volunteer Infantry Regiment - Lieutenant Colonel Joshua Chamberlain (CO)
    70th New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment - Colonel Daniel Sickels (CO)
    7th Cavalry - Colonel Harry Flashman (scout)

    [ALL UNION PLAYERS WILL DISCUSS ADDITIONAL RECRUITMENT, final decision by overall commander.]

    The Union has $720,833 and 15,778 industrial points to spend on this army per year. Find recruitment information in the rules thread. Note that this army had 35,000 men at First Bull Run. I believe these resource allotments should get us somewhere near that number, so it is subject to change.

    Starting Resources:

    $1,441,666
    40,000 industrial points
    Last edited by Pontifex Maximus; April 30, 2013 at 10:22 AM.

  2. #2
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    I say we purchase a surplus of cannon
    Last edited by Dirty Chai; April 30, 2013 at 05:48 PM.

  3. #3

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Need to spend $245,000 and 4,000 industrial points on the three infantry regiments and one cavalry regiment that we have.

    Edit: figured out that it is a cavalry regiment.
    Last edited by tyboman; May 01, 2013 at 09:56 AM.

  4. #4
    Lucius Malfoy's Avatar Pure-Blood
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21,275

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by tyboman View Post
    Need to spend $165,000 and 3,000 industrial points on the three infantry regiments that we have, and then however much the cavalry unit is, I don't know what it's strength is.
    Cavalry is not the best idea in the Civil War. Most of the terrain is not suitable for cavalry charges. Its best to build up our infantry and artillery with a sizable cavalry detachment for scouting and pursuit in the case of armies routing.
    Gaming Director for the Gaming Staff
    Gaming Director for the Play-by-Post Subforum and the RPG Shed


  5. #5
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    When I signed up as Meade, I hoped there would be a McClellan.

    I'm a little unsure of what to do.

  6. #6

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    No I mean to say, we have to pay for those units listed above, first and foremost. I also have to disagree with you, while cavalry is not useful for charges, it is an excellent way to make the enemy look the other way. Plus, it can get places fast, and hold them until the main army arrives, as done at Gettysburg.

  7. #7
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Raiding done by cavalry can be important, more so for the southerners.
    Which reminds me. We need to protect our rails.

  8. #8
    Captain Blackadder's Avatar A bastion of sanity
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,234

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    I agree that artillery plus more regiments would be a plus with a small cav detachment
    Patronised by happyho
    Patron of Thoragoros, Chilon
    Member of the Legion of Rahl


  9. #9

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    I propose we allocate our remaining $1,196,666 and 36,000 resource points that we have left after paying for our current troops, in this manner

    150 companies of infantry to form 15 more regiment strength units = $825,000, 15,000 resource points
    145 batteries of 12 lb artillery, = $371,200, 1,168 resource points


    This recruitment would cost a total of $1,196,200, and 16,168 resource points.
    It would bring out total strength up to this:

    180 companies, or 18 regiments of infantry
    145 batteries of 12lb artillery
    10 companies, or 1 regiment of cavalry


    We should also obtain a supply wagon for every company/battery, which will cost an additional 3,350 resource points.
    After all of this, we would be left with $446 and 16,482 resource points.
    Last edited by tyboman; May 01, 2013 at 10:50 AM.

  10. #10
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    That looks mostly reasonable to my eyes... although I wonder if we should have 2 regiments of cavalry rather than one.

  11. #11
    Praepositus
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,616

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    I don't suppose any more need be spent on recruitment for the year than has already been proposed. We have plenty of manpower and resources to expend - more than the enemy currently has - but for now let us keep our numbers on par with those of the Confederates. In doing so, we force our commanders to be more responsible for the men under their command and keep army supply a more lucrative asset - one which the industrial power of the North can more readily replace when the need arises.

  12. #12
    Majonga's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    3,258

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Lorem Ipsum View Post
    I don't suppose any more need be spent on recruitment for the year than has already been proposed. We have plenty of manpower and resources to expend - more than the enemy currently has - but for now let us keep our numbers on par with those of the Confederates. In doing so, we force our commanders to be more responsible for the men under their command and keep army supply a more lucrative asset - one which the industrial power of the North can more readily replace when the need arises.

    I solidly support this argument, however I would caution against overlooking the need for cavalry. Our cavalry is the eyes and ears of our army and a small number of them renders us blind. We should not negate the ability of cavalry to rapidly redeploy during battle either. A cavalry reserve that can be sent to reinforce positions quickly would be a boon that we don't want the Confederates to have instead of us.

    Hence I support the raising of a second regiment of cavalry, however even then our horse arm may be outnumbered by the Confederates as many as two to one.
    "All warfare is based on deception. Hence: when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near." - Sun Tzu

  13. #13

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    I propose we allocate our remaining $1,196,666 and 36,000 resource points that we have left after paying for our current troops, in this manner

    150 companies of infantry to form 15 more regiment strength units = $825,000, 15,000 resource points
    80 batteries of 12 lb artillery, = $204,800, 640 resource points

    20 companies of cavalry to form 2 regiment strength units = $80,000, 2,000 resource points

    This recruitment would cost a total of $1,109,800, and 17,640 resource points.
    It would bring out total strength up to this:

    180 companies, or 18 regiments of infantry
    80 batteries of 12lb artillery
    30 companies, or 3 regiment of cavalry

    290 supply wagons

    We should also obtain a supply wagon for every company/battery, which will cost an additional 2,900 resource points.
    After all of this, we would be left with $86,866 and 15,460 resource points.
    How about this revision?
    Last edited by tyboman; May 02, 2013 at 02:06 PM.

  14. #14
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    In favor here.

  15. #15
    Praepositus
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,616

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    As am I, but you're making the final call. Though, I think the needs of our current armies in the initial confrontations have been satisfied, and it's probably safe to move on to the topic of army composition, command assignments, and deployments

  16. #16
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    As a character I'm in charge, but not as a player.

  17. #17

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Technically speaking, as Meade, you do make the final decision.

  18. #18
    Praepositus
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,616

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    And don't worry about feeling a little unsure, you're in good company with this staff.

  19. #19
    Dirty Chai's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    17,263

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    If all are in favor, then yeah, of course we'll go with that.

  20. #20

    Default Re: The Army of the Potomac (USA planning thread)

    Alrighty, now we need to ascertain the exact location of our of the army, and then were we should go from there.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •