War for Westeros

[Pinkie Pie]

I know your plan Pinkie. Don't try to fool me. You are no ally of mine
I bet that the part of no sailing ships north of Shield Islands is in krder to protect your ally Lannister. That way he cannot pass his forts and the Westerlands are safe
I also know that when you manage to take enough of noobys lands you will declare kingship. For the minute being, I just hope you bleed each other as much as possible
You proved yourself oathbreaker when signing the alliance with the Lannisters. Tyrell sent that fleet to help him take the Westerlands
I don't trust you Pinkie. Just like I don't trust Greyjoys xD

Edit: thank you Zarcas, for making this hotseat so much more boring
Renly- http://www.filedropper.com/wfwrenly9

Why you think I would bend the knee to you when all you do is threaten me with war is beyond me. When you begin treating those who would be your allies with some respect perhaps you will get to keep the Iron Throne, continue to threaten them and brand them oathbreakers though and they may start considering other claims to the Seven Kingdoms.

[Riverknight]

Wow,
Looks like the Western front of World war 1, lots of trenches... also Noob... dont use Brynden to attack, this is not your fight.

[complete noob:(]

That is uri's way of diplomacy. It is about to lose him a ton of hotseats. I can think of at least 3 off the top of my head that he will be attacked in soon. Because of the way he treats other people

And the Blackfish is patrolling the southern borders of the Kingdom of the North. We do not want anyone else's armies inside our borders

[Uriyaca]

I am just pointing out that I'm not stupid
And I very well know you are co-operating with the Lannisters. You are no ally of mine

You didn't even do anything to prove yourself. Like breaking off the alliance. You just kept it there

Say all you will, I'm not buying it. And after being betrayel in several hotseats, I am trying to find traitors everywhere I can xD

What ther reason would you have not to let Tyrell's ships go north of Shield Islands?

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I bet you told Lann that as part of your deal he cannot recruit any ships. When he told you that Tyrell can attack him if he doesn't, you said you will guard the shores for him

Another proof is what EoH told me, saying rhat he is confident that the Westerlands are safe. Meaning that he knew you would not attack him, and he knew that Tyrell wouldn't be able to pass his forts because of you

If you want to prove you are not lying, attack the Banefort and the Crag. He would have no forces nearby, since all of them are either protecting against the Tyrells or against me. He has no fleet, so he has no chane to stop you

All you will get is gain the sacking money from those castles

[Pinkie Pie]

Of course EoH said he is safe, I have a treaty with him and I have not tried hiding that fact. You claim intelligence even as you ignore the facts and throw accusations around. I have made my position very clear since the start.

I have a treaty with both the Lannisters and Tyrells, neither treaty requires me to aid them in battle and as an addition to the treaty neither is allowed ships anywhere near my islands. Rather than attempt to make me a friend and ally you presume to threaten me and call me an oathbreaker when I have done nothing against you or your allies that was not clearly outlined in negotiations.

As of now the Iron Islands declare war on the false king Stannis. He is to be executed via drowning and his brother, Renly Baratheon, as the laweful heir will be placed upon the Iron Throne. Perhaps he will prove a wiser king than his arrogant brother.

[Uriyaca]

Of course EoH said he is safe, I have a treaty with him and I have not tried hiding that fact. You claim intelligence even as you ignore the facts and throw accusations around. I have made my position very clear since the start.

I have a treaty with both the Lannisters and Tyrells, neither treaty requires me to aid them in battle and as an addition to the treaty neither is allowed ships anywhere near my islands. Rather than attempt to make me a friend and ally you presume to threaten me and call me an oathbreaker when I have done nothing against you or your allies that was not clearly outlined in negotiations.

As of now the Iron Islands declare war on the false king Stannis. He is to be executed via drowning and his brother, Renly Baratheon, as the laweful heir will be placed upon the Iron Throne. Perhaps he will prove a wiser king than his arrogant brother.

You say I ignore facts but I have based only on facts, nothing else

You proved yourself an oathbreaker the minute you signed an alliance with the Lannisters, whom are enemies of the Iron Throne, something you knew very well

It has not been spoken in the thread even once that you do not allow Tyrell to send fleets north of Shield Islands, meaning that Lannister has become well aware of that fact via diplomacy.

A declaration of treason is better then false declarations of loyalty. Ronald Storm is given the lordship of Pyke in the stead of the treatcherous Greyjoys. Yes, you heard right. A bastard will become the Lord Paramount of the Isles in your stead.

The status of the Greyjoys is transformed from hostile to enemy.

Just answer this with a logic response and I will believe that you are right. WHY DID YOU SIGN AN ALLIANCE WITH THE LANNISTERS INSTEAD OF A NAP?

[Pinkie Pie]

You say I ignore facts but I have based only on facts, nothing else

You proved yourself an oathbreaker the minute you signed an alliance with the Lannisters, whom are enemies of the Iron Throne, something you knew very well

It has not been spoken in the thread even once that you do not allow Tyrell to send fleets north of Shield Islands, meaning that Lannister has become well aware of that fact via diplomacy.

A declaration of treason is better then false declarations of loyalty. Ronald Storm is given the lordship of Pyke in the stead of the treatcherous Greyjoys. Yes, you heard right. A bastard will become the Lord Paramount of the Isles in your stead.

The status of the Greyjoys is transformed from hostile to enemy.

Just answer this with a logic response and I will believe that you are right. WHY DID YOU SIGN AN ALLIANCE WITH THE LANNISTERS INSTEAD OF A NAP?

The definition of an oathbreaker is someone who breaks an oath. My allance with the Lannisters was made long before the treaty with the Tyrells and while we have spoken of it you have yet to bother trying to negotiate any formal alliance between us. Stop calling me an oathbreaker when I have never been your ally nor broken a treaty.

You have yet to provide any proof of your claim to the Iron Throne and do not even control the city within which it rests.
From what I see I the Starks claim dominion over the North and the Riverlands, I claim command over the Sunset Sea and the Lannisters claim the Iron Throne. All of these claims have something to back it up. The Starks control all they claim, the Lannisters still own the Iron Throne and I am the only person with ships in the Sunset Sea. You are the only one who has claimed something without any way to back said claim, in fact at this moment you are little more than a rebel and a trator.

I sent you a private message detailing the agreement between me the and Tyrells, you yourself compained that I was refusing you and your allies entrance into the seas north of the Shields but eventualy relented. Do not claim ignorance when I know you were made aware of everything.

Ronald Storm needs to take the Islands first, something he may find quite difficult when he is choking on seawater and his false king lies dead beside him. Surrender your claim to the Iron throne, send your king over for an easy execution and I will forgive your lack of diplomacy.


Because my treaty with the Lannisters was signed long before the hotseat started while my treaty with the Tyrells was made formal after I had made an alliance with the Lannisters. Considering the two treaties did not clash I felt there was no reason to change my diplomatic stance.

I continue to show patience to you because your ally (while annoying when it comes to pushing the boundaries of our treaty) has negotiated faily. As of now I will no longer answer your insults, we are at war and only the blood of your king will fix that now.

[Uriyaca]

The definition of an oathbreaker is someone who breaks an oath. My allance with the Lannisters was made long before the treaty with the Tyrells and while we have spoken of it you have yet to bother trying to negotiate any formal alliance between us. Stop calling me an oathbreaker when I have never been your ally nor broken a treaty.

You have yet to provide any proof of your claim to the Iron Throne and do not even control the city within which it rests.
From what I see I the Starks claim dominion over the North and the Riverlands, I claim command over the Sunset Sea and the Lannisters claim the Iron Throne. All of these claims have something to back it up. The Starks control all they claim, the Lannisters still own the Iron Throne and I am the only person with ships in the Sunset Sea. You are the only one who has claimed something without any way to back said claim, in fact at this moment you are little more than a rebel and a trator.

I sent you a private message detailing the agreement between me the and Tyrells, you yourself compained that I was refusing you and your allies entrance into the seas north of the Shields but eventualy relented. Do not claim ignorance when I know you were made aware of everything.

Ronald Storm needs to take the Islands first, something he may find quite difficult when he is choking on seawater and his false king lies dead beside him. Surrender your claim to the Iron throne, send your king over for an easy execution and I will forgive your lack of diplomacy.


Because my treaty with the Lannisters was signed long before the hotseat started while my treaty with the Tyrells was made formal after I had made an alliance with the Lannisters. Considering the two treaties did not clash I felt there was no reason to change my diplomatic stance.

I call you an oathbreaker because you say that I am your king but then betray me. Perhaps not the best wording there is

All of the sons of Robert Baratheon are bastards between Queen Cercie and the kingslayer. Eddic Storm is the proof, see yourself how Joffrey does not resemble his father at all while Edric is very similiar to Robert and you would see that my word is true

I would've controled the Iron Throne by now if it wasn't for Joffrey being a total crybaby . And you delude yourself, Lord Balon. The Vale, the Reach, the Stormlands and all the men of Dragonstone are backing my claim. Which is at the moment the largest forces in Westeros.

I did relent to the Shield Islands thing, although I found no logic to them. But as I said, after putting the pieces together it was obvious why you have so stubburnly stuck to that subject

I remember the last time the Iron Fleet tried to face the might of King Stannis. And I remember the last time Lord Balon betrayed his truthful king. You will find that I am harder to kill then you might think

That is one of the worst excuses you can possibly give to that. You are basically saying: "yes, I lied. I did have an agreement with the Lannisters, just like you thought. And I lied to you when saying you are my king, well knowing that I am allied to your enemies"

Hmff. Considering the two treaties did not clash? You do realize you are saying you are allied to two enemy kings?

I am glad, that for once, I could see the treason coming

[Emperor of Hell]

You're not terribly good at making allies, are you?

[Uriyaca]

You're not terribly good at making allies, are you?

Actually I am good, and as you might have noticed before you have signed an alliance with the Greyjoys there was nothing but respect for the Ironborn

The trust replaced with suspicion, evidence added to suspicion, putting the pieces together....

Greyjoy has yet to answer to my question. Which is evidence all by its own . I've counted 5 so far

[Pinkie Pie]

As I said before, we are now enemies and I no longer need to justify my actions to you.

You have forced my hand, I would have wished for more time to plan but within the next five turns this little tussle between the Tyrells and Lannisters will be over and then we shall see who sits the Iron Throne.

[Uriyaca]

As I said before, we are now enemies and I no longer need to justify my actions to you.

You have forced my hand, I would have wished for more time to plan but within the next five turns this little tussle between the Tyrells and Lannisters will be over and then we shall see who sits the Iron Throne.

I would have wished for more time to plan

Aha . I like being right
Little tussle, as in you intend to attack Tyrell? Not surprising, not surprising at all even. I bet its going to be like YB2 all over again

You need to justify your actions if you say I have called you a traitor for no reason.

This alliance between Lannister and Greyjoy.... Dangerous. A Lannister with a Greyjoy is unbeatable. I would advice Lord Tyrell to rally stacks at Highgarden and Oldtown.

[Riverknight]

Stags and Lions up!!!

[Emperor of Hell]

https://mega.co.nz/#!fo5j1ZRK!SPFONH..._5HjNOF4D0is8A

Its WW1 all over the place here... hiding in my trenches... Tywin Frey came of age this turn, natural commander and Nightfighter.... COME AT ME BRO

[Riverknight]

https://mega.co.nz/#!fo5j1ZRK!SPFONH..._5HjNOF4D0is8A

Its WW1 all over the place here... hiding in my trenches... Tywin Frey came of age this turn, natural commander and Nightfighter.... COME AT ME BRO

What do we say to the god of attacking?

Not today!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

[complete noob:(]

Greyjoy

[Pinkie Pie]

Next.

[Uriyaca]

Renly

thank you Empy, for boring me so much. I'm basically skipping myself now
For some wierd reason I can recruit 10 units of each type, I don't know whats going on

[zaracassie]

For some wierd reason I can recruit 10 units of each type, I don't know whats going on

That is strange.

[Riverknight]

Joff you

Alos I have the same thing Uri has, I can make 10 of each unit in some of my settlements.