Buchanan Declares: Third World Conquest Of America

[Francisco Montana]

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN AUG 20, 2006 16:02:35 ET XXXXX

BUCHANAN DECLARES: THIRD WORLD CONQUEST OF AMERICA

**Exclusive**

“As Rome passed away, so, the West is passing away, from the same causes and in much the same way. What the Danube and Rhine were to Rome, the Rio Grande and Mediterranean are to America and Europe, the frontiers of a civilization no longer defended.”

So begins a new work of warning from Pat Buchanan.

And this time Buchanan goes all the way.

STATE OF EMERGENCY: THIRD WORLD INVASION AND CONQUEST OF AMERICA streets this week and is designed to jolt readers with stats/analysis of illegal immigration gone dangerously wild.

Buchanan warns: “The children born in 2006 will witness in their lifetimes the death of the West."

One in every twelve people breaking into America has a criminal record.

By 2050, there will be 100 million Hispanics concentrated in the U.S. Southwest.

Between 10 and 20 percent of all Mexicans, Central Americans and Caribbean people have already moved to the United States.

Every month, the U.S. Border Patrol apprehends more illegal aliens breaking into our country, 150,000, than the number of troops we have in Iraq.

[The book was ranked #571 on AMAZON's sales chart Sunday evening.]

Buchanan slams the president: “Concerned about his legacy, George W. Bush may yet live to see his name entered into the history of his country as the president who lost the American Southwest that James K. Polk won for the United States."

In EMERGENCY, Pat Buchanan charges the Mexican regime with an Aztlan Plot, a conscious campaign to use America as a dumping ground for its poor and unemployed, both to relieve social pressure and effect a cultural re-annexation of the American Southwest. La Reconquista, the reconquest of the lands lost by Mexico in the Mexican-American War, Buchanan charges, is underway.

The Republican Party, a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is in the grip of a cult called “Economism.” It is all about money now. The GOP worships at the “Church of GDP”

• Both parties are paralyzed by guilt over American past racial sins.

• Powerful Mexican and U.S. elites seek to erase America’s borders and merge the United States and Mexico into a “North American Union.”

In his controversial final chapter, “Last Chance,” Buchanan lays out a national plan to deal with the State of Emergency, before it makes an end of America:

• An Eisenhower-type deportation program, beginning with all illegal aliens convicted of felonies and every gang member not a U.S. citizen.

• A ten-year moratorium on all legal immigration, at the level JFK favored in 1958 -- 150,000 to 250,000 a year.

• A $10-billion, 2000-mile double-line security fence between the United States and Mexico, built with no apologies to Mexico City.

Developing...

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashpjb.htm

Discuss...

[AMERICARULES]

Pat Buchanan is a moron who was cast out of the republican party because he was a nut. NOBODY should take him seriously. I agree that we need to build a fence and stop illegal immigration, but Pat is very confused when it comes to his ideas of the "Reconquista". What will he think of next?

[Nationalist_Cause]

Pat Buchanan is a moron who was cast out of the republican party because he was a nut. NOBODY should take him seriously. I agree that we need to build a fence and stop illegal immigration, but Pat is very confused when it comes to his ideas of the "Reconquista". What will he think of next?

Actually Buchanan left the Republican Party.

Buchanan is a nut. 'nuff said

How so? Details.

[Last Roman]

How so? Details.

I have yet to see or know one Hispanic that wants to take over the US. They come here for work, not a new reconquista. His theory is plain craziness

[Last Roman]

Buchanan is a nut. 'nuff said

[removeduser_487563287433]

I'll read that in full later. But just skimming it, he rattles his doom book about the death of the west, and then for some reason mentions Hispanics? Did I miss something? When did Spain detach from Europe and float off to the Gulf of Arabia?

[Last Roman]

I'll read that in full later. But just skimming it, he rattles his doom book about the death of the west, and then for some reason mentions Hispanics? Did I miss something? When did Spain detach from Europe and float off to the Gulf of Arabia?

By Hispanics he means Mexicans, Hondurans, Nicaraguans etc, not Spaniards. But either way, both are from the west. Buchanan is a fundamentalist racist nutjob, nothing more.

[removeduser_426582376423734]

I'll read that in full later. But just skimming it, he rattles his doom book about the death of the west, and then for some reason mentions Hispanics? Did I miss something? When did Spain detach from Europe and float off to the Gulf of Arabia?

South America...?

[removeduser_487563287433]

Thank you kindly, but I am aware what a Hispanic is. Unless they are worshipping the feathered serpent and making human sacrifices on top of pyramids, I will class Southern Americans as the West as comfortably as I do North Americans.

[Last Roman]

Thank you kindly, but I am aware what a Hispanic is. Unless they are worshipping the feathered serpent and making human sacrifices on top of pyramids, I will class Southern Americans as the West as comfortably as I do North Americans.

You said Spain. Last I checked, Spain isn't in the Americas.

[removeduser_487563287433]

You said Spain. Last I checked, Spain isn't in the Americas.

Northern Americans are decended from French, Dutch, English, German etc, Southern Americans are decended from Spanish and Portugese. There is the connection I was making that really I did not have to explain.

[Last Roman]

Northern Americans are decended from French, Dutch, English, German etc, Southern Americans are decended from Spanish and Portugese. There is the connection I was making that really I did not have to explain.

Well obviously you did.

[Richard the Lionheart]

One of the primary causes of illegal immigration are free trade agreements such as NAFTA, which are supported by the U.S. itself. So if you want the illegal immigration to decrease, perhaps one should reconsider the advantages and disadvantages of these free trade agreements.

[AMERICARULES]

One of the primary causes of illegal immigration are free trade agreements such as NAFTA, which are supported by the U.S. itself. So if you want the illegal immigration to decrease, perhaps one should reconsider the advantages and disadvantages of these free trade agreements.

No, I believe the primary cause of illegal immigration is the fact that our government isn't doing anything to stem the flow of immigrants across the border. Build the fence NOW!

[Last Roman]

No, I believe the primary cause of illegal immigration is the fact that our government isn't doing anything to stem the flow of immigrants across the border. Build the fence NOW!

That's not the root cause of it. That is a reason we have so many illegals here, but not the reason there such a huge rush of illegal immigration.

[Miraj]

To the adventurous and heroic Mexicans settlers of the northern frontier:

THANK YOU!

[gigagaia]

One of the primary causes of illegal immigration are free trade agreements such as NAFTA, which are supported by the U.S. itself. So if you want the illegal immigration to decrease, perhaps one should reconsider the advantages and disadvantages of these free trade agreements.

Funny about that H&G, why don't you see hordes of Canadians pouring across the Norther Border? (You know, that founding partner of Nafta)
How can you prove that Free Trade causes illegal immigration? Since illegal immigration is caused largely by things like poverty and poor social conditions, and Free trade is something that helps lower prices and increase jobs (thus help alleviate those problems) in poorer countries, I would say that free trade is anything but the problem, but a means to the solution. Increases in trade help develop economies and raise standards of living to the point where people don't want to run away from their states, not the other way around.

What is the logical relationship H&G? How shall you justify your claim?

[Richard the Lionheart]

Funny about that H&G, why don't you see hordes of Canadians pouring across the Norther Border? (You know, that founding partner of Nafta)
How can you prove that Free Trade causes illegal immigration? Since illegal immigration is caused largely by things like poverty and poor social conditions, and Free trade is something that helps lower prices and increase jobs (thus help alleviate those problems) in poorer countries, I would say that free trade is anything but the problem, but a means to the solution. Increases in trade help develop economies and raise standards of living to the point where people don't want to run away from their states, not the other way around.

What is the logical relationship H&G? How shall you justify your claim?

It's rather simple once one does the relevant research.

Essentially, free trade agreements, such as NAFTA, are designed to benefit the larger corporations both here in the United States and in the other countries...in this case Mexico. Needless to say, the average Mexican citizen/worker suffers as a result.

Let's look at the current situation involving NAFTA and the illegal immigration problem from Mexico. Mexico obtains a large part of it's profit and income from agricultural sales. NAFTA allows the larger U.S. agricultural corporations to freely export their goods into the Mexican market and sell it for a cheaper price when compared to the agricultural goods produced by the Mexican farmers themselves. As a result, the Mexican agricultural industry and all the farmers cannot compete with the U.S. corporations. Over time, these Mexican farmers are driven out of business and are forced into bankruptcy. Basically, NAFTA bankrupts the Mexican farmers and drives them out of business, and remember that a huge number of Mexicans work as farmers in Mexico. Now they can't earn a living through farming and must now find another way. Guess what that way is? Crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

NAFTA provided a radically different competitive environment for many of Mexico's domestic industries that caused severe dislocations. The most widespread may have been in the agricultural sector where millions of campesinos depended on the sale of grain for income. Farmers who could not afford motorized equipment found themselves in competiton with the great grain producing combines of the U.S. and Canadian Midwest. Previous to NAFTA, the communal farming lands (Eijidos) had been secured to the campesinoes "in perpetuity" by Article 27 of the Constitution of 1917. Regarding this as economically inefficient, the planners of the Salinas regime revoked this provision as part of the implementing legislation for NAFTA. Thus NAFTA implementation meant not only that many of Mexico's small farmers became economically obsolete but that their ancestral lands could be seized by the large landowners for debts. An analysis of the impact by Professor Calva (3) indicated that a total population of 10 million small grain farmers would be at risk of being forced off the land due to NAFTA. Indeed the grain imports from the U.S. and Canada had by 1995 already captured over one third of the Mexican grain market. The impact of the invasion of U.S. businesses on other domestic Mexican businesses was also severe. After NAFTA, retailers like Walmart expanded rapidly in Mexico to much U.S. publicity. This expansion was fueled by their ability to sell goods at prices significantly lower than their Mexican competitors. Walmart managed to cut a wide swath in domestic Mexican retailers until an investigation revealed that their goods were largely manufactured in China and the Mexican government imposed a 300% duty on all goods imported from China. After the economic depression in the second year of NAFTA, Mexico had lost well over a million jobs in a country where over a million young people enter the job market every year (5). It's not surprising that under these circumstances the number of illegal immigrants from Mexico has sharply increased.

The supporters of NAFTA said that it would decrease the rate of illegal immigration, but it has done just the opposite.

[Sétanta]

I support the ideas of building a fence and deporting the illegals.

Oh, and Mexico does not benifit by having its skilled laborers and even white collar employees leave the country and send home American Dollars which further weakens the Mexican economy.

[Last Roman]

I support the ideas of building a fence and deporting the illegals.

A fence wouldn't do much (not saying it wouldn't help) but tunnels could easily be dug. As for deporting all the illegals, not only is it highly impractical and near impossible, it would be useless because they would just come back. What we need to do is fight the source, ie poverty in Mexico and the companies highering illegals here in the US.