R2TW COMPOSITE MAP

[JB_JIM91]

Enjoy ladies and gents,




JB_JIM

[JB_JIM91]

prettied that **** up a little

[CnConrad]

prettied that **** up a little

This looks damn good

[TheBlackTower]

very good but still a hope they will put india or a at least the start of it .

[Lord Dakier]

Look at that... all that space for a unique faction completely different from all the others... Armenia!!!!!!!

I'll shoot whoever says Pontus or Sels.

[jamreal18]

Armenia was allied with Pontus. PONTUS played a bigger role. MITHRIDATIC WARS. I can also say SELEUCID. Its either pontus or seleucid.

[Modestus]

Armenia was allied with Pontus. PONTUS played a bigger role. MITHRIDATIC WARS. I can also say SELEUCID. Its either pontus or seleucid.

To hell with it CA be a sport and make it 3 more playable factions, Pontus, Seleucid and Dacia.

[emperor77]

To hell with it CA be a sport and make it 3 more playable factions, Pontus, Seleucid and Dacia.

I kinda feel like there should be a playable in Iberia as well.

[IrishHitman]

I kinda feel like there should be a playable in Iberia as well.

Would screw with the playability and expansion of Carthage. Carthage is the dominant power in Iberia.

[HigoChumbo]

Would screw with the playability and expansion of Carthage. Carthage is the dominant power in Iberia.

In the game, Carthage has no provinces in Iberia, so it wouldn't screw their playability more than the iceni screw Gaul playability.

Also, it's not like Hispania is going to be empty if the Iberians are not playable, they will still be there managed by the AI, in a campaign as Carthage, it would make no difference at all if the Iberians were playable or not, they would still be an AI faction.

And Carthage has other options to expand, like east to Egypt or north to Sicily and Italy.

[Slydessertfox]

Armenia was allied with Pontus. PONTUS played a bigger role. MITHRIDATIC WARS. I can also say SELEUCID. Its either pontus or seleucid.

Mithradatic Wars were almost 200 years after the start date. Pontus wasn't allied to Armenia until Mithradates came around anyway...

[Noif de Bodemloze]

I remember CA told that this campaign map is much larger than Rome 1, but looking this photo it make me think that it is already in same scale like it was in Rome 1. I hope this campaign map will continue to more east.

[PietroMicca]

I remember CA told that this campaign map is much larger than Rome 1, but looking this photo it make me think that it is already in same scale like it was in Rome 1. I hope this campaign map will continue to more east.

No, it's already larger than Rome I.

[ngr]

Eastern part should look differently



With 8 factions some parts of map are obviously empty.

[JB_JIM91]

Eastern part should look differently



With 8 factions some parts of map are obviously empty.

I like what you did with the Parthian map, but fair call if im wrong, that first island (from the left) sticking its nose out on the egyptian map is rhodes, so Id move that whole egyptian/parthia area east more.

[SirFork]

Arabia and Egipt regions are cut off so i presume the map will extend south a bit further.

[Lord_Slop]

I'm not really well versed in history, but a possible Persia?

[WhiffOfGrapeshot]

I'm not really well versed in history, but a possible Persia?

That's sort of who Parthia end up being.

[MathiasOfAthens]

I'm not really well versed in history, but a possible Persia?

Yeah obviously. The Persian Achaemenid Empire fell in 330 BC. Game starts around 270. The Iranian area should be controlled by the Seleucid Empire and some minor Iranian states.

[Sharpe]

Asia Minor, The Steppes and Iberia all need factions now for a wholesome balance.