Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 71

Thread: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim_Ward View Post
    Seleucids have a ginormous empire at the start date, ergo they won't be a playable faction.
    Nice logic. /sarcasmoff

    Having a large empire (one that CA can easily make struggling in terms of its economy in the beginning) with hostile neighbors in all four directions is a challenge, not an instant win faction.

    You get attacked from Armenia to the north, Parthians to the east (and maybe an Indian faction in a DLC or something), Egypt to the south and from the sea, and the various Anatolian factions to the west and also from the sea.

    Your most important area (the Levant) is within three-turn striking distance from either Anatolia or Egypt. Lose Antioch in the beginning of the game and you will struggle to find the funds to maintain a large enough force to repel all four borders simultaneously.

    The Seleucid campaign will be a very hard and challenging campaign that differs form the other factions (start small and around a bunch of scrub rebel territories with neighbors that are also small).

  2. #2

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    What makes you think that they will make Ptolemaics have a historical unit roster? They have stated that they are going for a mix of Ancient Egypt units and Ptolemaic units. So they have the ability to create a really unique roster.
    From a historical point of view - sure, your point of valid.
    Last edited by Aleron; February 17, 2013 at 06:31 PM.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by Aleron View Post
    What makes you think that they will make Ptolemaics have a historical unit roster? They have stated that they are going for a mix of Ancient Egypt units and Ptolemaic units. So they have the ability to create a really unique roster.
    From a historical point of view - sure, your point of valid.
    No they did not. They said there would be a "historical twist" which could mean anything.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by RagingCroppy View Post
    No they did not. They said there would be a "historical twist" which could mean anything.
    I think the "twist" CA is planning is similar to the Empire/Republic realm divide they are planning for the Roman faction.

    My idea is that i think at some point in the Ptolemaic campaign you are to choose.

    Do we remain the same, under the rule of the Hellenic rulers? Or do we rebel and return to the old ways of Ramses II. It would be interesting, historically wise not so much *since the Ptolomes were pretty open to let the Egyptians worship their old gods and even let them keep their building methods and policies.* But it would be fun in game.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcani 4 Ever View Post
    I think the "twist" CA is planning is similar to the Empire/Republic realm divide they are planning for the Roman faction.

    My idea is that i think at some point in the Ptolemaic campaign you are to choose.

    Do we remain the same, under the rule of the Hellenic rulers? Or do we rebel and return to the old ways of Ramses II. It would be interesting, historically wise not so much *since the Ptolomes were pretty open to let the Egyptians worship their old gods and even let them keep their building methods and policies.* But it would be fun in game.
    I would vote yes on the possibility of a (playable) native Egyptian rebellion, but no on the "old ways" part.

    The Egyptians did in fact rebel in this period. So that still would not be a twist. And they likely did not revert back to bronze age Egyptians. look at the "Machimoi" units in Europa Barbarorum, Rome: Total Realism, and Roma Surrectum 2. Those are Egyptian units that look unique and Egyptian without being silly throwbacks to long dead empires.

    Take it from a huge fan of Ancient Egypt. As much as I like the ancient period, this is not the place for those units. We should not see them in the same way we will not be seeing Greeks wearing Corinthian helmets. (hopefully)

    (Also any bronze age Egyptians would be clobbered in a Classical battlefield anyway, especially against the Seleucids. The Machimoi rebellion on the other hand managed to hold out for 20 years against their Greek masters.)

  6. #6

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    True man, this is why we need Parthia as a faction. Mass horse archers ftw.

  7. #7
    Sharpe's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,876

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    This thread has totally swayed their decision to include the Seleucids....

  8. #8
    Heathen Storm's Avatar Where's my axe?
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    2,895

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids


    ;D
    Seriously though, the factions are already decided. You repeating the same thing over and over won't change CA's mind.

    Proud mod leader, modeller and public relations officer of Heiđinn Veđr: Total War


  9. #9
    Karnil Vark Khaitan's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    DaneMark
    Posts
    5,031

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    didnt one of the CA employ said they had a new roster as in they are one of the 8

    Im the Knight in Sour Armor http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...ghtInSourArmor
    Rainbow Darling rainbows Darling. Darling Rainbows!!!!!
    but on the same time modder with my first mod for Rome 2!http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfile.../?id=286218945
    Hey Sparkle Sparkle Sparkle!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDULtV9U2kA
    Quote Originally Posted by riskymonk View Post
    yea but mods are created by fans of the series. Games are created by university students who might not necessarily know or play the games/series they're working on

  10. #10
    MathiasOfAthens's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Stockholm, Sverige
    Posts
    22,877

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by VarrKhaitan View Post
    didnt one of the CA employ said they had a new roster as in they are one of the 8
    Yes that was Lusted, referring to rumours the egyptians would be ancient old kingdom.

    I am sure based on that we will get the Ptolemaic faction.

  11. #11
    Maleventum's Avatar Decanus
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Samnium, Italia
    Posts
    508

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Prabably we will see Desert Axemen fighting alongside Hellenistic Pezetheroi

  12. #12

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Antiochus, Europa Barbarum is far from being a game based on real facts,units,etc.
    Seleukids and the Ptolemaioi ,are both uniques like any other people.
    But if you ask me whats the most exotic ,Ptolemaioi ,no dought, is there anything more exotic than playing with the sons of the Pharaohs ?
    If you ask whos the strongest in militaray aspect, Seleukids with no dought.

  13. #13
    MathiasOfAthens's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Stockholm, Sverige
    Posts
    22,877

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Except the sons of the Pharaohs didnt exist under the Hellenic regime. The ancient egyptian kingdom fell and was replaced by the Persians and then Alexander and then Ptolemy, who created a hellenic empire in egypt.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by MathiasOfAthens View Post
    Except the sons of the Pharaohs didnt exist under the Hellenic regime. The ancient egyptian kingdom fell and was replaced by the Persians and then Alexander and then Ptolemy, who created a hellenic empire in egypt.

    What ? So by your amasing logic,there aint Italy,Egypt,Turkie,France,Spain,etc because they were invaded over and over by other nations during the centuries..

  15. #15

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by oOIYvYIOo View Post
    What ? So by your amasing logic,there aint Italy,Egypt,Turkie,France,Spain,etc because they were invaded over and over by other nations during the centuries..
    Dude. Just stop. France, Spain, Turkey, Italy aren't even countries until several centuries later after the time period of the game.

    The mainstream Egyptian image of hieroglyphs and pharaohs (pharaoh itself wasn't even used as a widespread title for the rulers of Egypt until the mid-late bronze age) is long gone by the time of Rome II. The gods are still there, but the Egyptians are speaking Greek, and the provincial leaders are Greeks/Macedonians or Hellenized Egyptians.

    The first Ptolemy of Egypt didn't go and resurrect millennium-old war units in favor of modern day Greek unit rosters and tactics. He Hellenized the heck out of Egypt and trained Egyptians in the Greek style of fighting. There were no "Pharaoh's Bowmen" or "Pharaoh's Pikemen," they would have went under the Greek names.

    All this trash about Egypt being like the Old Kingdom, rocking chariots and Nubian spearmen as the main force is complete and utter historical garbage. Sure, the Ptolemies raised levies of native forces, but they were in no way, shape, or form, superior to Greek units.

  16. #16
    petertel123's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    netherlands, Amsterdam
    Posts
    301

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by oOIYvYIOo View Post
    What ? So by your amasing logic,there aint Italy,Egypt,Turkie,France,Spain,etc because they were invaded over and over by other nations during the centuries..
    1 Italy no longer has a roman culture since its invasion by the barbarians
    2 Egyt no longer has an ancient egyptian culture since the multiple invasions it has suffered
    3 turkey no longer has a greek culture since the turkish invasion
    4 France no longer has a celtic culture, it was founded by GERMANIAN conquerors
    5 Spain no longer has the culture of antiquity (not sure what culture they had actually) since its numerous invasions
    so yes, I think it's fair to say that foreign conquest can change a countries culture dramatically

  17. #17

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    So after the Suebi are confirmed as member of the playable 8 club, the whole "We need awesome Seleucids, not stinkin Germans and who says different is nationalistic"-stuff has stopped (finally, thank god) and the crowd has turned on the Ptolemaicegyptians. Who obviously suck just as much as the Germanobarbs exclusively did before. I see.

    Not sure yet whether I now should...

    a) ...pray for the Seleucids to be the next revealed faction, just for this kind of threads to stop, and sacrifice a lamb or two to make sure the mighty gods share my opinion.

    b) ... prepare for the ineviteable Parthia-bashing in case Egypt is revealed next, meaning that Seleucids and Parthia have to duke it out for the last remaining club 8 member ticket (note: buy beer and potato chips, enjoy the show)

    c) ... create another forum account with user name "Ali Ben Jabba" and pretend to be a nationalistic Egyptian who really desperately wants Ptolemaigyptistan playable and really thinks Seleucids were and are and will be disgusting elephant-lovers, and this way trololol the beejezus outta the Seleucid supporters just for the fun.

    Hard decisions to come

  18. #18
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Lithuania, Kedainiai
    Posts
    100

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by Kraut View Post
    So after the Suebi are confirmed as member of the playable 8 club, the whole "We need awesome Seleucids, not stinkin Germans and who says different is nationalistic"-stuff has stopped (finally, thank god) and the crowd has turned on the Ptolemaicegyptians. Who obviously suck just as much as the Germanobarbs exclusively did before. I see.

    Not sure yet whether I now should...

    a) ...pray for the Seleucids to be the next revealed faction, just for this kind of threads to stop, and sacrifice a lamb or two to make sure the mighty gods share my opinion.

    b) ... prepare for the ineviteable Parthia-bashing in case Egypt is revealed next, meaning that Seleucids and Parthia have to duke it out for the last remaining club 8 member ticket (note: buy beer and potato chips, enjoy the show)

    c) ... create another forum account with user name "Ali Ben Jabba" and pretend to be a nationalistic Egyptian who really desperately wants Ptolemaigyptistan playable and really thinks Seleucids were and are and will be disgusting elephant-lovers, and this way trololol the beejezus outta the Seleucid supporters just for the fun.

    Hard decisions to come
    Do c) variant. It could be pretty funny. Just think up a better name Ali Ben Jabba looks too mainstream.
    "Your majesty will faster see Vysla streaming backwards than lithuanians and their etmon routing"

  19. #19

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by tomux7 View Post
    Just think up a better name Ali Ben Jabba looks too mainstream.
    What about "Jabba Abu Ali"?

  20. #20
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    At home
    Posts
    100

    Default Re: Ptolemaics weren't more specific faction than Seleucids

    Quote Originally Posted by Kraut View Post
    So after the Suebi are confirmed as member of the playable 8 club, the whole "We need awesome Seleucids, not stinkin Germans and who says different is nationalistic"-stuff has stopped (finally, thank god) and the crowd has turned on the Ptolemaicegyptians. Who obviously suck just as much as the Germanobarbs exclusively did before. I see.

    Not sure yet whether I now should...

    a) ...pray for the Seleucids to be the next revealed faction, just for this kind of threads to stop, and sacrifice a lamb or two to make sure the mighty gods share my opinion.

    b) ... prepare for the ineviteable Parthia-bashing in case Egypt is revealed next, meaning that Seleucids and Parthia have to duke it out for the last remaining club 8 member ticket (note: buy beer and potato chips, enjoy the show)

    c) ... create another forum account with user name "Ali Ben Jabba" and pretend to be a nationalistic Egyptian who really desperately wants Ptolemaigyptistan playable and really thinks Seleucids were and are and will be disgusting elephant-lovers, and this way trololol the beejezus outta the Seleucid supporters just for the fun.

    Hard decisions to come
    IŽll go with "a" more or less. But I pray that they announce the Seleucids not to be playable. As soon as possible, to stop those endless "goooo Seleucids they are sooooo unique and have more than all the other factions together" threads.
    I really liked to play them in Rome I, but all those threads make me wish they are not playable.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •