[HS] A Game of Fire and Blood (FaB 0.7)

[Badger-dude]

Almost glorious House Hightower's turn

[the duke dude]

And indeed it is glorious Hightower's turn:

Attachment 265587

[Badger-dude]

Fun fact - I discovered earlier today that Hightower can't recruit any of the new AOR units in 0.7 - Not can I garrison them, meaning I am going to lose money on unkeep.

My fault, obviously. I need to learn to count how many factions are in game (18 or 19 now, I think)

[Rhaegal]

Lannister is up!

Does anyone else get scared when you double click the save file, the screen goes black, and suddenly you are playing left 4 dead?

[Rhaegal]

Sorry, forgot to upload.

[complete noob:(]

Tyrell the Traitor is up.

I wonder what Ser Garlan is planning to do. I hope he doesn't fall into any traps

[Uriyaca]

Tyrell the Traitor is up.

I wonder what Ser Garlan is planning to do. I hope he doesn't fall into any traps

I hope he does

[Lakritstroll]

Stark´s turn!

[Lakritstroll]

Here are some pics BTW.

[Uriyaca]

Here are some pics BTW.

Whatevs. Dundarrion is coming to reclaim it

[Riverknight]

Lord Edmure finds this act of pillaging disgusting especially coming from highgarden which is the home of chivalry!

Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2

[Uriyaca]

You broke the rules then damn you

Destroying buildings is not allowed if a castle/city is under siege or if an enemy army large enough to take it can reach it in one move.

Two in one hour? really Lakristroll? I would say now is a good time for a fine...... but whatever just replay

[Lakritstroll]

Silly me, however not to risk getting fined,
I was bragging to lure you into a trap, which I believe I can raise enough troops to destroy you within.
Now please lay off the pointy fingers.

[Uriyaca]

Silly me, however not to risk getting fined,
I was bragging to lure you into a trap, which I believe I can raise enough troops to destroy you within.
Now please lay off the pointy fingers.

What? so you didn't break ze rules?
Why would you lie then? you know I can just see if you burn it down or not

[Lakritstroll]

Well, the rules are tricky in this one.
If I could break the seige it does not mean I'm obliged to do so.
And if I dont reinforce with any troops any small army would be large enough to take it,
however if I dont resist and let you take the settlement does it mean I've broken the rules even
if I razed the buildings but have proper reinforcements I "could" use?

[Uriyaca]

Well, the rules are tricky in this one.
If I could break the seige it does not mean I'm obliged to do so.
And if I dont reinforce with any troops any small army would be large enough to take it,
however if I dont resist and let you take the settlement does it mean I've broken the rules even
if I razed the buildings but have proper reinforcements I "could" use?

The rule is simple. Dundarrion has twice if not 3 times the men Loras has. That means you broke the rule
If you don't agree and refuse to replay, then we will have to wait for the admin to decide. I'll VM him

[Badger-dude]

Destroying buildings is not allowed if a castle/city is under siege or if an enemy army large enough to take it can reach it in one move.

I am not really a fan of this rule. It seems a little odd. Under siege is understandable.

Perhaps just restrict the destruction of certain buildings (i.e barracks/smithy?) instead?

[Uriyaca]

I am not really a fan of this rule. It seems a little odd. Under siege is understandable.

Perhaps just restrict the destruction of certain buildings (i.e barracks/smithy?) instead?

I think this rule is great!
Like when in TPW I had every single Martell settlement with a full stack 1 turn away, enough to take it, but when he realized it he simply burnt it all down as an act of desperation (it really sucked. It was Completenoob btw)
Sme thing in YB when Korpskog burnt down Winterfell that wouldn't have happened if that rule was in there. Also, this protects from someone who sees an army one turn away and knows he can't deffened it, so why not? lets burn it down !

[TheWitchKing]

I am not really a fan of this rule. It seems a little odd. Under siege is understandable.

Perhaps just restrict the destruction of certain buildings (i.e barracks/smithy?) instead?

If many people aren't happy with the rule there could be a change in the nearby future, but for now we will handle this. Maybe a bit too many rules too keep all track off...

I'll re-create the buildings with the console.

[Louis XVI]

If many people aren't happy with the rule there could be a change in the nearby future, but for now we will handle this. Maybe a bit too many rules too keep all track off...

Lakitsroll will have to replay his turn and leave the settlement ''unharmed''.

Couldn't you do that with the console? FaB hotseats should never be allowed to slow down