DeliCious 1v1 Head to Head campaigns.

[DeliCiousTZM]

When it comes to having the most epic total war experience, it is not about avatar conquest or co-op. The most epic total war experience can be found in its Head to Head multiplayer campaign component, which uses all facets of the game to forge the ultimate experience. Many people find 1v1(H2H) to be a very threatening, and sometimes too time consuming. They are not wrong getting that game up is anything but easy, people lagg,suck,moan,play as the AI and quit constantly. And finding that person that matches you in skill and setting is no easy feat. Now i'm personally a fast player and 2-3 minutes turns is what i prefer, so finding someone thats good that can play at that speed as well becomes even harder.

Now with all of that said you should start playing Head to Head asap, because i will bet that the future of Total war lies in the multiplayer campaigns.







Last moments but still entertaining vids

[Man o' War]

So you can move 15 agents, move armies, move fleets, minister to 20 or more provinces and cover all diplomacy in 3 minutes per turn.
Let me guess, you auto resolve most battles as well?

[DeliCiousTZM]

So you can move 15 agents, move armies, move fleets, minister to 20 or more provinces and cover all diplomacy in 3 minutes per turn.
Let me guess, you auto resolve most battles as well?

Short answer? Yes, if you dont believe me just watch my gameplay. Also i like to add that i prefer having more time later in a campaign but not in the beginning.

If you find this impossible weird or far fetched i suggest you go play another RTS like Starcraft2 try to reach top master there, and you will feel that you naturally play faster. This is mirrored in most Koreans i play against online. They have the mechanics to perform fast and get more value out of their game time.

[Man o' War]

I don't doubt for a moment that you can move units, order buildings, chat to the neighbours, etc etc in 3 minutes or under.

This is what I don't get.
What is actually legendary about the campaign if you auto resolve battles?

[DeliCiousTZM]

I don't doubt for a moment that you can move units, order buildings, chat to the neighbours, etc etc in 3 minutes or under.

This is what I don't get.
What is actually legendary about the campaign if you auto resolve battles?

To get this timer thing out of the way.
First off you have your opponents turn to do stuff. You can build,lower/raise taxes,recruit and prepare for where you will move your army/agents.
Second, the timer stops when you are actively perform diplomacy now out of respect for your opponent you shouldn't linger there for minutes on end contemplating.

In my last Head to Head i had two minutes to micromanage 15 provinces and several super powers residing on my border as the ikko ikki! with 10 leveled up agents! in only two minutes! and sometimes i only needed a minute.

I guess your a little odd, i mean since you have this philosophy to play every battle.Some of us have a little mileage on us and actual skills. Now if your some weirdo that play 90% won battles on a 60 minute timer good for you! For me that is not stimulating, it is not stimulating for me to fight redundant battles for hours on end instead i fight the battles where i'm favored TO LOSE.

Now if you don't have anything of value to add, please refrain from posting since your negativity and lack of knowledge/experience is infuriating.

[TheCrazyCat]

playing battles in campaigns are time consuming as hell, though its possible to do all those things he did, I can't since 90% of the time i alt tab when my friend is doing his turn and lose track of wth i was gonna do.

[BoanakO]

playing battles in campaigns are time consuming as hell, though its possible to do all those things he did, I can't since 90% of the time i alt tab when my friend is doing his turn and lose track of wth i was gonna do.

So u still play CooOP and i wanted to spear you the Chalenge...HM Burrum

[DeliCiousTZM]

Added new FOTS Head to Head campaign between me and Cruzz

Everyone i play are certified Legendary players, even tho they vary in skill, i never bother playing and much less record anyone under Legendary status. With a few exceptions.

[oOIYvYIOo]

I would like to have a MPC against or with you Monetary.
I leave the chalenge here

[oOIYvYIOo]

helo ??

[oOIYvYIOo]

I i wrote on your TWC profile ,youtube account ,so i assume that you fear having a campaign against me .
Maybe i was already on that top 10 list of best Campaign players and didnt knew.

Ah you have responded to me lets battle !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[DeliCiousTZM]

I i wrote on your TWC profile ,youtube account ,so i assume that you fear having a campaign against me .
Maybe i was already on that top 10 list of best Campaign players and didnt knew.

Ah you have responded to me lets battle !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Allright so its time for a reality check here. I don't have a list of the top 10 campaign players in the world. And if i were to place myself on it that would be some shamefur dispray stuff. Now believe it or not i win literately over 99% of my games and yeah i have way over 100 head to head games. I still don't believe that i'm "The" best player or one of the top ten. Many people believe that this makes me arrogant. Mostly because they lose to me and i point out where they went wrong. I dont shy away from conflict and i enjoy a good argument. People that know me, know as a humble and confident. People that hate me thinks I'm arrogant and douche.

What i can say for certain is that i'm in the top tier, the top most qualified where I'am in this top tier is unknown to me. I have played people where i have won by only a 55% sabotage from a ninja or a inch of a movement on my generals. And that makes me understand that this person could take a game of me any day even if i "won". Win and lose is an empty construct anyway. To me winning is stretching your abilities and being rewarded. Losing is stretching my abilities and being punished. Truth be told i need to lose more. And if you are reading this and thinking your the one to do it please dont. i'm being flooded by people like this guy thinking they can take me down.

All right so on the subject of you oOIYvYIOo.
You wanted to play me i accepted your steam request as soon as i got it. There i told you i would be busy playing other players for a few days. You were chatting me up i were chatting you back then i told you "brb for a few hours". I come back jump into a campaign i had already scheduled days in advance. And what do you do? You freak out start saying im ignoring you. and saying well your playing with someone right now why not me? What made you so fracking special? That i should cancel all my sessions to play with you.

Of course this were my first indicator that you were mentally unstable, but i tried to be fair you went offline i wrote on your wall that we could play on Monday, that was before i noticed that you had removed me for no reason. When you tried to add me again i left another post and i asked my buddy the glorious master Cruzz if he could try you out. Because you were on crazy watch i wanted to give you a chance before i just put you on ignore.

So first game you die to the AI on hard. The second game Cruzz roflstomp you down, while your calling Cruzz a cheater for "moding" the game so the AI attacks focus you more. Then you have your own little crazy rules about how people shouldn't auto resolve any battles and if he didn't autoresolve a battle against the AI you would just win. You die in disgrace you leave in disgrace. You are far from top tier, and the notion that you are top 10 in anything is a joke.

But hey dont take my word for it watch the game where he does it yourself and ask yourself why episode2 isn't uploaded.

[oOIYvYIOo]

Uou i didnt read not eve 5 % of that.

You just show what you are ,you say on your videos that your on top 10 with cruzz of campaign players on LEG/LEG and now you say you dont have the list ?
ahahahahahha

I just add you to show you how bad you are and you to avoid making video about it,you went asking cruzz to fight me , or better to fight the AI ,because i can count 2 battles that i fought as AI against cruzz clan in
50 turns of gaming where he probably made 30 battles vs the AI (all as he said 3:1 ,so even 3:1 he would loose).

There aint any second episode done due i wasnt recording nothing ... hahahahaha

What ?
Who roflstomped me ?The AI ? Yes he did both times .
But i can show some of the battles where i overruned cruzz on the battlefield over and over and over and over .
The only time he won was he had 1500 vs 700 of mine the rest he lost .

Why you dont bother to post my topic for everyone to read what hapened ?
I save you the work : http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=588279

Dude , i wrote to you on your youtube chanel,on your TWC pofile ,on this topic and you spent days making hard view to my "chalenge".
And then you talk like you were a great player of campaign saying that i had to play another person before i play you ?
You are at a very very low level comparing with me strategically and tactically on campaigns,mpb,on everything.
You play the AI battle after battle and win campaigns .
When i saw you making a video of "Agent War" i and my friends laughed like unstabble maniacs .
Never i saw someone making excuses to avoid to fight the AI on battlefield or even with auto and making a army of agents .
Its hilarious.

If you wanna be considered a top player on campaings you gotta WIN on the battlefield ,playing on "fight battles" .
You just play SPC on your videos.

You play against AI you dont play the player and specially when is superior on battlefield.

When i saw your videos (and you removing of people posts on your videos criticizing you) i already imagine that this would happen.
Your just like thousand of arrogant players that i have know till today on campaigns.Only talk .

If you wanna play any day ,play as a real TW player,fight everything ,not using bug exploits and not CHEATING.

[Cruzz]

I just add you to show you how bad you are and you to avoid making video about it,you went asking cruzz to fight me , or better to fight the AI ,because i can count 2 battles that i fought as AI against cruzz clan in
50 turns of gaming where he probably made 30 battles vs the AI (all as he said 3:1 ,so even 3:1 he would loose).

Who roflstomped me ?The AI ? Yes he did both times .
But i can show some of the battles where i overruned cruzz on the battlefield over and over and over and over .
The only time he won was he had 1500 vs 700 of mine the rest he lost .

50 turns? You lost the first game within what...10-ish turns to the AI? And the second game only lasted 15-ish turns before you quit, though not like I really wanted to continue it either.

During those 15-ish turns the battles we had were, as far as I remember:

your 2xgeneral 2x yari ashigaru 1x bow ashigaru 1xyari samurai, you defending in a forested hill corner of the map vs
AI 2xgeneral 2x yari ashigaru 1x bow ashigaru
You won, congrats. I thought I did pretty well considering I gave them one move order at start and tried to change target to your general once, during the entire fight.

Your main stack, defending in castle, vs an AI 0-veterancy 1-star general stack outnumbering you roughly 2:1.
You lost, and lost the campaign while at it pretty much.

2x AI bow kobaya with 1-2 archers remaining each vs your full health bow kobaya
You won, only the autocalc can think that 2 bow kobayas with no archers can actually win against a full health one.

Me humoring you by sallying out to fight a battle I was at a disadvantage unit number, quality and veterancy wise (though the AI had no general so there was some chance of winning if I could get a route going) and which I didn't care if I won or lost. You won, by a bigger margin than I expected, but either way it wouldn't have affected my campaign much especially considering how awful you had played on the campaign map so far.

2 castle defenses with me defending vs AI forces of roughly equal size, I won both, though in your defence in the first one I took more casualties than I would've against the AI just blindly rushing.

Damn did I get owned repeatedly during that campaign.

As a side note, do you seriously think people don't play battles where they have a huge advantage because they think they're going to lose? Fighting all these your army vs 1 samurai retainer battles sure would be a large improvement economy wise as you'd get intact castles every time, but who honestly can bother with that?

You are at a very very low level comparing with me strategically and tactically on campaigns,mpb,on everything.

Big words for someone who keeps getting killed by the H/H AI.

If you wanna be considered a top player on campaings you gotta WIN on the battlefield ,playing on "fight battles" .
You just play SPC on your videos.

You play against AI you dont play the player and specially when is superior on battlefield.

No, you just have to win the campaign. Fighting fights is optional. If you think battles are the only thing that matters, stick to mpb. All things considered, I think you would do well to stay away from campaign games, atleast against people who don't know about your special needs.

[TheCrazyCat]

hmm, whys he challenging you again?

[oOIYvYIOo]

hmm, whys he challenging you again?

Again ?
He never chalenged me .Read the posts please before writing.

[TheCrazyCat]

Again ?
He never chalenged me .Read the posts please before writing.

was asking him, why you bothered challenging him, 1st off no ones gonna play every battle on campaign against the AI, why? time consuming. 2nd your confusing MP battle with MP campaign. Winning a battle doesnt mean alot in a campaign game. Plus I don't remember you being good at MP battle yourself.

its your fault for being stupid and trying to bite more than you can chew. Thinking you can beat someone in campaign just because you are slightly decent in mp Battles. Should do something more productive with your time than make fun of others in their own past times.

[oOIYvYIOo]

15:05,it just show how arrogant person you are .
But more surprisingly is that anyone with a average knowledge of campaigns can beat you.

[oOIYvYIOo]

Noob excuses ...

Time cosuming ? What time cosuming ?
You have any deadline to end the campaigns ?
You have anyone after you to end campaigns?

Just be honest and say you cant handle fighting battle after battler and win .
Wining a battle doesnt mean alot on a campaign game ?You just show your knowledge of campaigns.
I play the game as it is ,playing all the battles , im chewing more than i can ?

Wait you dont remember me ? Since when i know you ?
Oh you do know me ?
Never heard about you .

Go check my stats on shogun 2,go check my profile screenshots of TW games .
And anytime if you wanna free lessons on campaign or on mpb just add me.

I wont bother on posting anymore here ,as all my steam friends ,why am i even bother .
Have good games and i hope to you on a game soon ....

[DeliCiousTZM]

Noob excuses ...

Time cosuming ? What time cosuming ?
You have any deadline to end the campaigns ?
You have anyone after you to end campaigns?

Just be honest and say you cant handle fighting battle after battler and win .
Wining a battle doesnt mean alot on a campaign game ?You just show your knowledge of campaigns.
I play the game as it is ,playing all the battles , im chewing more than i can ?

Wait you dont remember me ? Since when i know you ?
Oh you do know me ?
Never heard about you .

Go check my stats on shogun 2,go check my profile screenshots of TW games .
And anytime if you wanna free lessons on campaign or on mpb just add me.

I wont bother on posting anymore here ,as all my steam friends ,why am i even bother .
Have good games and i hope to you on a game soon ....

I'm not gonna kick on you, i feel bad for the scolding i gave you already. But many of the rules i keep in my campaigns is to keep the exploits to a "minimum". Some of the rules i personally prefer only. mind you when i play random people i don't force any of these rules upon anyone. But if you want a remake i make you agree to a few if not all.

• No fighting as the AI(You are not the AI)
• No starving castles(You are the attacker)
• No assassination of Daimyo(Assassination chance to high)
• No sniping general with artillery(FOTS)
• No Burning the gates and retreating(If you do play as the AI)
• Always do the AI objective in a timely manner(If you do play as the AI)
• AI difficulty normal/hard(To keep the AI capable but not overwhelming)

Few people have the amount of experience i have with the exploits i have encountered and the play styles i have faced. i didn't make these rules to my advantage i did it to up the quality of Head to Head games i have.

Some people have issues with these rules and they accuse me. You have no skill!You don't know Strategy! And so on. But does that make any sense? I want us too fight 1v1 Person to person with little involvement from the AI. To me a person that needs any of these rules above life itself might not trust that they can compete using only themselves. Most of my games are against Random people they aren't scheduled and 90% of them need to have Legendary achievement to even come close to me unless its a slow day. And i use all of these lame tactics and strategies that i prefer not to use, to great success too! Being as i on some days kill up to 8 Head to Head players in one day(Shogun2 not FOTS)

My ninjas love eating people egos.