The chewing of the coca leaf, a practice dating back a mere 8,000 years was re-legalised yesterday, in what appears to be a rare victory for science, common sense, and logic.
The UN Convention on Narcotic Drugs in a special dispensation recognised the practice as legal in Bolivia.
Why was it made illegal in the first place, is indeed mind-boggling. In 1961 the coca leaf was listed on Schedule I of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs together with cocaine and heroin, with a strict control level on medical and scientific use (see a historic clip from the convention here). The decision was based on a 1950 report commissioned by the UN, which I have read, and I have serious doubt that anyone voting back then took the trouble to even look at. For example, in page 93, it states that "chewing is not an addiction in the medical sense but a habit" and procedes to list 3 (three) effects of chewing: 1. Malnutrition due to constant activity 2. Undesirable changes in moral character which hinders the prospects of obtaining a higher social status (I kid you not) and 3. Loss of productivity.
Now, 60 years later, we do know more on the effects of chewing, (see the clinical effects here) which while not making chewing benign, certainly do not put it above alcohol and nicotine in terms of health hazards and addiction potential. It is also funny (as in hypocritical) that the countries objecting to that (namely United States, Mexico, Japan, Russia, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Portugal, Israel and Ireland) have no qualm of letting their citizens smoke and drink.
Of course, the reason for such objections is not the care for the Bolivian farmers and workers but the instinctive association of the leaf with cocaine, the production, importation and use of, these countries have failed to hinder despite some isolated suspicious claims to the contrary.






Reply With Quote







