
Originally Posted by
Cayo_Julio_Cesar
I keep reading that there is no difference other than the forced batle UI and the unique save.
I believe that's wrong.
First on Legendary the AI can transform its ashigaru into samurai at will (so long as you haven't seen thouse ashigaru before) , and very early in the game, which means having samurai in your army is a must. I don't think they can on very hard, because you see ashigaru armies well into mid game, they do have ridiculous ammount of money so they will have more samurai with little provinces, but on legendary you see them with full stacks at turn 10.
Second, in battles, while on theory the same as very hard, I find that they play much better, they know how to manuever their cavalry very well, to avoid your spears and target for your generals, and their ashigaru seem to have infinite moral.
Also on legendary, once you manage to route them, well that's it , because since they are faster than you and aparanently have much more stamina, they always outrun your pursuing units, this doesnt seem to haven on very hard.
And I play VH with the realistic UI and still notice it is way easier than Legendary.
Your thoughts?