View Poll Results: What Do You Do?

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • I follow orders and open fire on the targets.

    22 48.89%
  • I refuse orders and do not fire on the targets.

    23 51.11%
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 65

Thread: A Moral Scenario

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Sir Winston Churchill's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    11,515

    Default A Moral Scenario

    You are an artilleryman/drone controller in the military, and your commanding officer orders to you fire on a group of people. However when you survey them, they look like nothing more than civilians in a village. You can't make out the targets any more due to the limits of infrared vision, and despite your inquiries into the legitimacy of the target, your CO insists you open fire.

    What do you do? Do you follow orders and open fire on the targets? Or do you refuse? Please have in-depth descriptions with your answers as to why you make your choice.

    Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
    — CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalminar View Post
    My statements are correct by virtue of me saying them. Additional proof is not required.

  2. #2

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    You take the shot, unless there's some huge reason to doubt your commander. You can question his judgement at a later time, but since you can't make ANY sort of ID at the time, you should follow orders. While your target could just be civilians and your commander has gone crazy, they could more likely be high value targets not carrying visible weapons. You might ask for confirmation, relay some sort of doubt, but if the order comes down you take the shot. Usually the guys higher up have more information than the guy pulling the trigger, just a fact of life.
    If you rep me, leave your name. I'll look more kindly on your future transgressions.

  3. #3

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    That's the point of chain of command. The guy above you knows something you do not. In combat, there is no time to explain.

    But IIRC attacking an unidentified target is against NATO rules of engagement, and in that case CO is giving you illegal order, so you should stand down.

  4. #4

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by Sar1n View Post
    That's the point of chain of command. The guy above you knows something you do not. In combat, there is no time to explain.

    But IIRC attacking an unidentified target is against NATO rules of engagement, and in that case CO is giving you illegal order, so you should stand down.
    Yup.

    If you feel an order is illegal you can refuse and you'll most likely have your time in court to articulate your reasoning.

  5. #5

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    If they are indeed a legitimate target your CO will tell you why, even if its as little as "it's a guy and his associates we've been after for years, but his identity is secret".

  6. #6
    Vanoi's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    17,005

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Not a real moral scenario since soldiers are allowed to disobey orders if they feel the orders are wrong. Like killing civilians.

  7. #7

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Did you just pull this out of Spec Ops: the Line?

    Anyway, i refuse orders and wont fire.
    Last edited by SuperTechmarine; December 17, 2012 at 12:13 PM.

  8. #8
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Blah, if the target is so important information would generally give to the one who pull the trigger.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  9. #9
    Himster's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Dublin, The Peoples Republic of Ireland
    Posts
    9,838

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    "I was just following orders" is not an excuse for murder. In the good old days we would hang such soldiers.
    But it's still not an easy position to be in.
    The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts.
    -Betrand Russell

  10. #10
    Engie's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    710

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    If I had any doubt about my commanders orders I would refuse to do it, because if I found that I had killed some innocent civilians I wouldn't be able to live with myself.

  11. #11
    Sir Winston Churchill's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    11,515

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    So what if by refusing to fire you ended up missing the chance at a high-profile target who went to cause serious damage against your forces?

    Like, when do we draw that line between ROE and trust in our superiors?

    Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
    — CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalminar View Post
    My statements are correct by virtue of me saying them. Additional proof is not required.

  12. #12

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy View Post
    So what if by refusing to fire you ended up missing the chance at a high-profile target who went to cause serious damage against your forces?

    Like, when do we draw that line between ROE and trust in our superiors?
    Did you play Spec Ops: the Line? That game questions moral ambiguities as well, and you are too, now that i think about it, maybe that high-profile target could have killed millions if i had left him live, dozens will die so that a million can live.

    "In war, there is no good or bad, there's only bad or worse, there's a moral line you have to cross, you can only choose to what degree you will cross it, if at all."

  13. #13
    Sir Winston Churchill's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    11,515

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperTechmarine View Post
    Did you play Spec Ops: the Line? That game questions moral ambiguities as well, and you are too, now that i think about it, maybe that high-profile target could have killed millions if i had left him live, dozens will die so that a million can live.

    "In war, there is no good or bad, there's only bad or worse, there's a moral line you have to cross, you can only choose to what degree you will cross it, if at all."
    No, I didn't play Spec Ops (but maybe I will now). I actually thought of this question while driving home one day.

    Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
    — CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalminar View Post
    My statements are correct by virtue of me saying them. Additional proof is not required.

  14. #14

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    It has been scientifically proven that most people will do what a higher authority tells them too, even if they think it is morally wrong. I won't answer however I would do it or not though, as these situations seems to be driven by circumstance rather than rational thinking.


  15. #15

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    I fire and kill them for the lulz

  16. #16
    Col. Tartleton's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cape Ann
    Posts
    13,053

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Doubled
    Last edited by Col. Tartleton; December 18, 2012 at 05:55 AM.
    The Earth is inhabited by billions of idiots.
    The search for intelligent life continues...

  17. #17
    Col. Tartleton's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cape Ann
    Posts
    13,053

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Unless I'm actually able to determine they aren't combatants I'm taking the shot and shifting the blame.

    Collateral damage is half the battle. Mistakes happen. If people hesitated every time they had to pull the trigger you'd lose the war.

    It's not like he's asking me to fire on a friendly position or on a known commodity of civilians. Obviously that's not kosher.

    If I was in an aircraft I wouldn't see the people and I'd just drop the bombs.

    It's a howitzer, not a sniper rifle. I don't decide who lives and who dies, that's up to the shrapnel pattern.
    Last edited by Col. Tartleton; December 18, 2012 at 05:54 AM.
    The Earth is inhabited by billions of idiots.
    The search for intelligent life continues...

  18. #18
    I WUB PUGS's Avatar OOH KILL 'EM
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Nor ☆ Cal
    Posts
    9,149

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    HVT or any T need not be armed to be a T. You're just a trigger puller, but you have the right to inquire or disobey. The OP doesn't seem like one of those times, your knowledge is limited. You don't know what your CO does and he doesn't need to tell you everything.

    Even if it came out that I killed a bunch of civies, it wouldn't be on me. I didn't make the call, and I could live with myself because I would know I didn't have sufficient information to justify disobeying the order. I have to trust my commander to know wtf he is doing and make the right call, just like he has to trust me to do what I'm told.

    This isn't that hard to answer. A better scenario would be a clearly identified HVT hiding out in a Children's Hospital.
    Last edited by I WUB PUGS; December 18, 2012 at 03:40 PM.

  19. #19
    Psychonaut's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,080

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    I wouldn't be in that situation in the first place Even if they were enemy combatants, I wouldn't fire. that.

  20. #20
    clone's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    greece
    Posts
    3,465

    Default Re: A Moral Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychonaut View Post
    I wouldn't be in that situation in the first place Even if they were enemy combatants, I wouldn't fire. that.
    prepare to die then
    When a nation forgets her skill in war, when her religion becomes a mockery, when the whole nation becomes a nation of money-grabbers, then the wild tribes, the barbarians drive in... Who will our invaders be? From whence will they come?”
    Robert E. Howard



Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •