[HS] Last Stand

[vozd]

Next!

[Hopelessly Hopeless]

up bruh

[complete noob:(]

Interesting. Martell wants 4 settlements, yet in reality they are losing the war. Prince Gulian has marched from Storm's End, ready to end the Dornish invasion of the Stormlands. Dagos Fowler is dead. Oberyn Martell is stuck in a fort, sieged by Lord Dondarrion. Surrender now (meaning leave Mistwood), and your other son, Ulwyck, will be kept as a ward of Lord Connington, until Prince Gulian sees fit that Dorne is sufficiently sorry. Accept these terms and your army besieging Mistwood will be allowed to live. Decline, and you will lose two sons, two armies, and be hated by Dorne for the rest of your reign.

Bolton up.

[Uriyaca]

How exactly am I losing this war? you only besieged my fort, and as far as I know, you didn't kill me yet, only attacked my general (is he dead?... I don't know what about him but it says that he lost 15 bodyguards).
Don't grow overconfident... After I take Mistwood then the king and his heir will go for the Rainhouse, which I assume is not protected

[complete noob:(]

Fowler is dead. The fort is under siege, but there is no way you can win that siege. I feel like that puts me in the lead as you will have lost nearly a stack, while I lost only a settlement. Plus I have another stack marching south. not overconfident, just looking at the facts

[Uriyaca]

I shall decide if I were to agree to a ceasefire my turn, when I can look at the facts.
Have you considered that my army lead by Ulyck Martell can move there as-well by ship?
Have you considered that the 2 units army of swordsmen can attack your back which you sieged, and after they are defeated attack Dundarrion?
Have you considered that the king of Dorne and his heir can take even more settlements from you? And they lead very high quality men, if I may add...

[Uriyaca]

Sorry double post...

[complete noob:(]

If Ulwyck can make it it is a major bug. Swann barely managed to get there, and he only traveled half the distance you would have to. And unless your king is near the Tor at sea, he cannot make it. Plus I have reinforcements moving south as we speak. I may not know where all of your armies are, but I do know that Dorne cannot support a massive army, and I have already located 2 of them. At most there is 1 and a half more stacks out there somewhere led by not very good generals (because Martell is plagued with having crappy generals sadly.)

[Dux]

Yes he should have really picked Yronwood, way better troops and generals. The only advantage of martell in the game is better starting position and larger armies at the beginning.

But this discussion about who is better is best decided on the battlefield.

[complete noob:(]

After playing Martell using the descr_strat, I can logically assume that the king and his heir are somewhere near those Dornish "fingers" north of Sunspear, with nearly a full stack. Neither the king nor the heir has night fighter, which is good for me as Gulian does not

[hackera96]

Trot1217 i am still waiting for screenshot from the siege of riverrun

[xXAmonXx]

hmmm

[Trot]

Martell. Come little Loins even you will return to Mudd. Screen shots next post. The save is good I just forgot to change the name

[Trot]

And here are your pics I had 4 armies in walking distance

[Uriyaca]

You should have pm me.... No matter I will do my turn about 8 hours from now

Edit: I must ask you guys before I end my turn... is it allowed to attack your enemy if you agreed on a ceasefire this turn? because if lets say we I and Stormkings agree on a ceasefire then both my sieges and his are lifted right? but if then he decides to besiege me again, and he simply gets a free turn to send Gulian where he wants, that way he gets free movement points....
If it is allowes I think that there should be a rule against it like: If you agreed on a ceasefire with another player, you can't attack him that turn. That will make it fair right?

I have already finished my turn but respond to me before I upload Lannister please...

[Uriyaca]

Lancel up!

Well, because I need to go now I decided to post the save after all, but without my offer for a ceasefire. If Stormkings got my pm with my offers and demands for a ceasefire, this will be a verbal agreement. If you lift the siege of Oberyn I will lift the sieges of Stonehelm and Rainhouse.

Concerning what me and Storm argued about, here are the info:

Stormkings
units lost: If you won't agree to my proposal for a ceasefire, you will have a total of 15 dead units, including 2 dead generals. (12 in garrison, 3 killed with my swordsmen-pics below)
settlements lost: If Stormkings won't accept my offer, they will lose a total of 3 settlements next turn (and who knows, maybe some more in the future ) Mistwood, Rainhouse and Stonhelm. You can't lift the sieges off this settlements, neither Gulian or Dundarion.

Martell
units lost: a full stack, in the fort of Oberyn Martell
settlements lost: 0, but who knows, maybe I will lose settlements if Stormkings decides to march south...

So... if you compare this: 5 units is in my opinion less important then 3 settlements

Anyway, I besieged on my turn the settlements of Rainhouse and Stonehelm, and captured Mistwood. Also killed the petty general Swann, the monster who killed Fowler and also killed 2 mercenery cavalry units.

[hackera96]

gardener up Attachment 252878

[Dux]

Arryn

The Reach is back in the hands of the Andals!

[vozd]

Brave move Stormy, but dragon is too strong.
And now you can't go home.
I want to hear good offer if you want peace.

[complete noob:(]

Wow, this really sucks. I am now dead. My Crownland armies are stuck on Dragonstone. Someone (Mudd, Stark, Bolton) could easily profit from an invasion of the Vale though