We basically have no real choice. They're both for zionist agenda and American imperialist ambition in the middle east, and trade war with China. Both were saying the same thing, just differently.
We basically have no real choice. They're both for zionist agenda and American imperialist ambition in the middle east, and trade war with China. Both were saying the same thing, just differently.
Agreed. The necessity for media attention in order to reach past the anonymity in such a large country has created a system in which achieving change through sending a new political party to power via election difficult, but perhaps not impossible.
Grass roots activism can be useful, but we all know what happened to the rather uneducated and not so vigilant Occupy Wall Street movement. You need to gather people who are clever and know everything about how the bank usury fraud works, who are prepared to do non-violence activism all over the country.
The big problem with any such movement or new party, is infiltration by people who belong to the enemy, who will eventually perform some self-discrediting act that puts the new movement in a bad light (especially when exaggerated by bankster owned media), so it is forced to dissolve and a new movement is needed - similar to how violent people sneaked into the Occypy Wall Street movement to discredit it, and how violent people sneaked into almost every anti-immigration movement in Europe before very recently when more and more of these organizations got more aware of the problem.
The key to achieving change is to start INFILTRATING and COUNTER-INFILTRATING the parties and organizations that have been taken over, in the same manner our enemies do. Create an irregular network of people who are awake, who can INFILTRATE and COUNTER-INFILTRATE everywhere, sometimes in coordinated groups. Because no change can be achieved, if we just go and sulk and start a new party every time infiltrators take over a party. It simply takes too long to go through the whole process of getting known to the masses from scratch - roughly 10 years - and by the time those 10 years have passed the new movement is infiltrated too... The battle needs to be fought in the same way our enemies fight - by driving out the vermin wherever it settles, in every single organization or political party.
Last edited by truth1337; October 23, 2012 at 12:03 PM.
I bet the time is near when people grow AWFULLY tired of seeing a picture of a retard with tin foil on his head every time they disagree with the ideologies of the hateful satanic marxist establishment. And frankly, marxists need to come up with something different if they want to have any sort of credibility, but I guess credibility isn't part of the marxist arsenal, since it doesn't fit well with their other weapons genocide and stifled free speech in the name of "protection" by intimidation - and completed by collaborators who make rather pathethic attempts at ridicule where the rough edges of law can't reach.
Don' go there Bro.
He has already going strong on that theme in a thread about stars, hammer & sickles, the joos, 160 million dead, the Eu, Lithuanians, and the colour blue.
"Tell people that there's an invisible man in the sky who created the universe, and the vast majority will believe you.
Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure."
-George Carlin
90% of teens would die today if facebook was destroyed. if you are one of the 10% that would be laughing, copy and paste this to your signature.
My Political Profile.
Under the patronage of Gertrudius!
I do have some advice on how you could go about seeing that picture less if it annoys you.
Fabian socialists...one day they will remove their sheep cloathes and reveal their true commie i.d's, Its just a matter of time till Die Internationale will be played on Pennsylvania Avenue and the workers of this world can finally unite in killing some more hundreds of million of people in the name of solidarity.
"ROFL LOL They are the same candidatesDerp".
I am amazed.
Didn't you notice Romneys change in behaviour at all?
Australias bogan media is even smarter then this...
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/new...-1226501635744
In the lead-up to the third and final presidential debate, which was staged in the key battleground state of Florida, many commentators have argued that Americans only want to hear economics.
That is unlikely. Americans know they have been at war in Afghanistan too long, for too many lives; they know the cost of Iraq, as well, to the lives of their own sons and daughters.
They also know that two expensive wars have stifled the rebuilding of America.
Romney, who has talked tough throughout the long campaign, including suggesting he would make preemptive strikes against Iran, completely reversed any such language during the debate, and instead spoke of war as an option of last resort.
"Let me step back and talk about what I think our mission has to be in the Middle East and even more broadly, because our purpose is to make sure the world is more peaceful," said Romney.
"We want a peaceful planet. We want people to be able to enjoy their lives and know they're going to have a bright and prosperous future, not be at war. That's our purpose."
It was good to hear; but who was the man saying it?And to make it really easy for you...It was not the Romney we have heard in the last six months, who has so often said he'd directly arm the Syrian rebels, even though they're overrun with Al Qaeda.
Now, he no longer wants to do this; just as he wants to spread a peace throughout the Middle East by using US aid money to impart an anti—Jihadist message.
Obama had only to sit there, use his experience, and make Romney suffer by reminding him of his campaign comments, such as his claim that Russia was America's biggest foe.
"Governor Romney, I'm glad that you recognize that Al Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what's the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not Al Qaeda," said the President.
"You said Russia, in the 1980s. They're now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War's been over for 20 years."
Obama looked like the man who knew what he was talking about. Romney's business experience is substantial, but he sounded a little weak talking about his time getting good school results when he was Governor of Massachusetts.
![]()
Contact me on Steam: steamcommunity.com/id/IZob/ or send a PM.
Just about what should be expected of any candidate really. If they want to get the popular vote that is. They're just saying what sounds good to the sheep, that's all.