The name says it all-a viable alternative to fossil fuels
Air Fuel Synthesis
The name says it all-a viable alternative to fossil fuels
Air Fuel Synthesis
Il y a quelque chose de pire que d'avoir une âme perverse. C’est d'avoir une âme habituée
Charles Péguy
Every human society must justify its inequalities: reasons must be found because, without them, the whole political and social edifice is in danger of collapsing”.
Thomas Piketty
So essentially using solar energy to convert it at a significant loss to chemical energy? Seems like they're missing a bit of the point but theoretically if we burn what we burned (so to speak) we're not really making any issues worse. Still I must wonder if the energy used to convert the air to fuel would be better used to generate electricity directly. I can't really find much on how they intend to do this.
Insane Technology Watch: Making Petrol From Air
There’s always someone out there claiming to have found the latest method of gaining free energy. Or cheap energy, green energy, non-fossil fuel energy. Sometimes people are even right in their claims: fracking has certainly brought us cheaper natural gas than not having fracking would have done. But it does have to be said that most of these claims are nonsense: as with this being reported today, a method of producing petrol (gasoline) from just the air:
A small company in the north of England has developed the “air capture” technology to create synthetic petrol using only air and electricity.Experts tonight hailed the astonishing breakthrough as a potential “game-changer” in the battle against climate change and a saviour for the world’s energy crisis.There’s nothing particularly wrong with the chemistry. Each stage is known to work. The problem is the insanity of stringing together those pieces of chemistry in series. It’s rather like a Rube Goldberg machine (Heath Robinson to Brits) where there’s pulleys and golf clubs and strange ratchets to do something very simple in a horrendously complex manner.
The technology, presented to a London engineering conference this week, removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
The “petrol from air” technology involves taking sodium hydroxide and mixing it with carbon dioxide before “electrolysing” the sodium carbonate that it produces to form pure carbon dioxide.
Hydrogen is then produced by electrolysing water vapour captured with a dehumidifier.
The company, Air Fuel Syndication, then uses the carbon dioxide and hydrogen to produce methanol which in turn is passed through a gasoline fuel reactor, creating petrol.
The ultimate aim is to power all of this process by solar power. But if that’s what you’re going to do it would be far, far, cheaper to make the methanol by using plants to absorb the sunlight. As we do with the current ethanol program. So that’s the first obvious problem with this idea: it’s even worse than the ethanol boondoggle.
The sodium hydroxide to carbonate then electrolysing to produce CO2: that looks a bit odd but is sensible enough. It’s a standard process for producing pure CO2 on demand.
But the great gaping hole in the idea to me comes in two parts. The first being slightly odd so bear with me. The production of sodium hydroxide in the first place requires vast amounts of energy. And it also has two byproducts: chlorine and hydrogen. So anyone looking at this sequence would immediately decide to get their hydrogen from that sodium hydroxide production not from the electrolysis of water.
The second is that the inefficiency of this system is grotesque. It would be far cheaper to use the electricity in some other manner. In batteries to power electric cars, or to electrolyse water to run fuel cells in cars, or you can, if you really want to, use hydrogen directly in an internal combustion engine.
The system works in its chemistry but it would be a very silly manner indeed of using the energy that the process would require.
The one part I cannot work out at the moment is whether this is a spoof that’s been played upon the Telegraph or whether these people really believe that they’ve got something useful here.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworst...ol-from-air/2/
Eats, shoots, and leaves.
Well that answered my questions.
Cheer up; when we have more fusion power than we know what to do with, 3D printers will extract the carbon directly from the atmosphere and recreate any number of plastic toys you might want to play with.
Eats, shoots, and leaves.
Still not worth comparing to something effective like Nuclear Power. Solar Energy is ust too costly and takes up too much space right now to use, let alone this.
« Le courage est toujours quelque chose de saint, un jugement divin entre deux idées. Défendre notre cause de plus en plus vigoureusement est conforme à la nature humaine. Notre suprême raison d’être est donc de lutter ; on ne possède vraiment que ce qu’on acquiert en combattant. »Ernst Jünger
La Guerre notre Mère (Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis), 1922, trad. Jean Dahel, éditions Albin Michel, 1934
It takes a long time to build one, but look at the facts, The only Powerplant that outputs more energy than a single nuclear reactor is the Hoover Dam. Just look it up on Wikipedia, it will even tell you that.
First - I want to see the energy balance of this thing first to make a judgement.
Second - Solar panels doesn't grow on threes, unless they build them with slave labor, so gas out of thin with free solar energy is out of My Dear Pony.
« Le courage est toujours quelque chose de saint, un jugement divin entre deux idées. Défendre notre cause de plus en plus vigoureusement est conforme à la nature humaine. Notre suprême raison d’être est donc de lutter ; on ne possède vraiment que ce qu’on acquiert en combattant. »Ernst Jünger
La Guerre notre Mère (Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis), 1922, trad. Jean Dahel, éditions Albin Michel, 1934
First - I want to see the energy balance of this thing first to make a judgement.
Second - Solar panels doesn't grow on threes, unless they build them with slave labor, so gas out of thin with free solar energy is out of My Dear Pony.
« Le courage est toujours quelque chose de saint, un jugement divin entre deux idées. Défendre notre cause de plus en plus vigoureusement est conforme à la nature humaine. Notre suprême raison d’être est donc de lutter ; on ne possède vraiment que ce qu’on acquiert en combattant. »Ernst Jünger
La Guerre notre Mère (Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis), 1922, trad. Jean Dahel, éditions Albin Michel, 1934
Sahara as a huge solar power collector.
Eats, shoots, and leaves.
Which is going to be built using magic Unicorn Turd.
Do you know how much difficult is it to gather the resources to build one massive dam which is something smaller that what you are proposing, now thing about building a massive facility in the middle of a desert and maintaining it function.
« Le courage est toujours quelque chose de saint, un jugement divin entre deux idées. Défendre notre cause de plus en plus vigoureusement est conforme à la nature humaine. Notre suprême raison d’être est donc de lutter ; on ne possède vraiment que ce qu’on acquiert en combattant. »Ernst Jünger
La Guerre notre Mère (Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis), 1922, trad. Jean Dahel, éditions Albin Michel, 1934
Takes a long time to build ONE we need dozens, getting ONE when we need FIFTY isn't going to help us. I thought that was abundantly clear and I'm sorry there isn't a wikipedia article to explain that one.
Perfectly feasible and that comes from experts in the industry, I'm guessing you haven't really examined the topic because the feasability problem does not lie in the panels but in the lines that would carry the power and the capacity/supply/storage problems in national grids.
« Le courage est toujours quelque chose de saint, un jugement divin entre deux idées. Défendre notre cause de plus en plus vigoureusement est conforme à la nature humaine. Notre suprême raison d’être est donc de lutter ; on ne possède vraiment que ce qu’on acquiert en combattant. »Ernst Jünger
La Guerre notre Mère (Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis), 1922, trad. Jean Dahel, éditions Albin Michel, 1934
The other option being the Gibraltar Dam, but I feel the Mediterranean has more value as a moat.
Eats, shoots, and leaves.
« Le courage est toujours quelque chose de saint, un jugement divin entre deux idées. Défendre notre cause de plus en plus vigoureusement est conforme à la nature humaine. Notre suprême raison d’être est donc de lutter ; on ne possède vraiment que ce qu’on acquiert en combattant. »Ernst Jünger
La Guerre notre Mère (Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis), 1922, trad. Jean Dahel, éditions Albin Michel, 1934