http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...n-afghanistan/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/28/us...-law.html?_r=0
AP Photo/U.S. Army
An Army brigadier general has been charged with forcible sodomy, inappropriate relationships, and possessing alcohol and pornography while serving as a senior commander in Afghanistan earlier this year.
Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, a deputy commanding general of the 82nd Airborne Division, faces a possible court martial over the charges handed down Wednesday.
In May, Sinclair was sent home to the United States in the middle of his combat tour in Afghanistan, where he was serving in the southern Afghanistan province of Kandahar as the deputy commander of logistics and support for the 82nd Airborne
Shocking news from the War on Terror.A news release by the Fort Bragg Public Affairs Office listed the charges presented against Sinclair as including “forcible sodomy, wrongful sexual conduct, attempted violation of an order, violations of regulations by wrongfully engaging in inappropriate relationships and misusing a government travel charge card, violating general orders by possessing alcohol and pornography while deployed, maltreatment of subordinates, filing fraudulent claims, engaging in conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman and engaging in conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, or of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.”
The US General has been sent home from his tour of duty for these alleged crimes. Its astounding and unprecedented.
Equally shocking is that he is being charged with not doing little to stop the troops under his command from raping females while he himself was sodomising and raping. The number of men under his command I understand are about 5000 to 7000.
My questions are this:
1). When was the last time a serving US General abroad was charged with such srs offences?
2). Is this case a sign of the US Army becoming undone in Afghanistan? A breakdown in discipline from top to bottom?
3). Did the General "go native", with many members on these boards talking about "man-love-thursday" in Afghanistan, did the General get too caught up in the local culture and therefore started sodomising erybody?
4). What does it mean, when they said "he did little to stop his troops from raping", is rape a big problem in the US Army?
5). Could it be considered a "perk of the job"? Being a US General serving abroad could/should allow certain privileges, its a stressful environment, so should he be allowed to stick his dick in wherever or whomever he pleases?





AP Photo/U.S. Army
Reply With Quote










