Swedish bureaucracy operates very independently from the political leadership which can cause some issues for Swedish politicians. The most notable ones in recent times being a lengthy environmental assessment by the local government on Gotland and the whole Assange extradiction battle.
But this fight is even more impressive as representatives of the Swedish enforcement administration (essentially baliffs) are auctioning an apartment complex owned and used by Russian diplomats in Stockholm. The legal background is a decision made by the International Court of justice in 1998 which awarded the German businessman Franz Sedelmayer approximately 2.3 million euro in damages caused by the Russian government seizing assets held by a company co-owned by Sedelmayer and the local administration in St Petersburg.
The Russian government have refused to comply with the court decision and Sedelmayer have therefore worked to have Russian property in Sweden and Germany seized in compensation. After a high court decision in Sweden the Swedish Enforcement Administration went in and decided to sell the contested apartment building in a public auction. Both the Russian Ambassador and Vladimir Putin have spoken out against the decision. As a response the Swedish minister of foreign affairs(Carl Bildt) have tried to intervene against the auction by reminding the Enforcement Administration about the Vienna convention but been ignored based on the decision made by the high court.
So what do you think. Is it a good thing to have an administration completely governed by law or should such bureaucracy be limited by politicians to avoid costly international disputes?
Is this worth fighting Russia for?
And is this man worth facing the rage of self appointed rape experts such as Danny Glover and Noam Chomsky?
Recent news in Swedish
Some background in English





Reply With Quote









