Anti-semitic, far right leader is... Jewish

[removeduser_487563287433]

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012...oots.html?_r=3

Amusing. Far right loser is confronted with proof he is partly Jewish (his grandmother was in Auschwitz) and tries to hush it up with a bribe of a potential EU job. Why are fascists so comical?

[PointOfViewGun]

Somebody should tell Kelso to burn the guy!

[frozenprince]

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...hoseWackyNazis

Yep. Nazis are a special kind of stupid. It's really quite funny, if it weren't for the fact that these nut jobs hold political sway.

[Arbitrary Crusader]

I am not surprised.

[Manco]

Must be a Zionist plot.

[Menelik_I]

Must be a Zionist plot.

[Aymer de Valence]

Must be a Zionist plot.

I seriously wouldn't be surprised.

[Menelik_I]

I seriously wouldn't be surprised.

obviously a Jewish Honeywell operation ... using a time machine invented in 1940 to know all future Far Right stars so Female Mossad Agents would bear their children and taint them for eternity.

I just wrote on the internet, so it is true.

[Grimecraft]

obviously a Jewish Honeywell operation ... using a time machine invented in 1940 to know all future Far Right stars so Female Mossad Agents would bear their children and taint them for eternity.

I just wrote on the internet, so it is true.

sigged

[Diglytron]

[frozenprince]

It defenitly is!

If history has taught us ANYTHING. It's when in doubt, IT'S THE JEWS!

Edit: Dammit you're ninja edit beat me to it.

[truth1337]

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012...oots.html?_r=3

Amusing. Far right loser is confronted with proof he is partly Jewish (his grandmother was in Auschwitz) and tries to hush it up with a bribe of a potential EU job. Why are fascists so comical?

I know several people in the national socialist movement, and can say that there's a deliberate effort from Jews to infiltrate the movement, then leave it under forms which work well as anti-national socialist propaganda in zionist owned massmedia. They don't "suddenly discover" they're Jewish - rather they know it full well when they enter the movement.

There are also two major movements within National socialism - the counter-Jihad, and the true nationalist movement. The counter-Jihad movement is highly Jewish controlled and very much pro-Israel.

The other movement is not anti-semitic, but highly against individuals of Jewish ancestry who have a leading role in bank frauds, outsourcing and buying up and selling out things owned by European nations. Naturally, this opinion does not stand in conflict with being a Jew - unless you're a Jewish supremacist ultra-racist who values the most disgusting members of your own group as worth more than the most righteous among other groups - you can and SHOULD oppose the unrighteous among the Jewish race. However Talmudic Jews who follow the Talmud fundamentalistically may of course prefer to apply the Talmudic principle which says: "even the best of gentiles deserve to die".

Also worth noting, is that NY times is owned by zionist half-Jew Arthur Ochs Sulzberger.

[frozenprince]

I know several people in the national socialist movement, and can say that there's a deliberate effort from Jews to infiltrate the movement, then leave it under forms which work well as anti-national socialist propaganda in zionist owned massmedia.

There's also two major movements within National socialism - the counter-Jihad, and the true nationalist movement. The counter-Jihad movement is highly Jewish controlled and very much pro-Israel.

The other movement is not anti-semitic, but highly against individuals of Jewish ancestry who have a leading role in bank frauds, outsourcing and buying up and selling out things owned by European nations.

Also worth noting, is that NY times is owned by zionist half-Jew Arthur Ochs Sulzberger.

Yes yes yes, more Nazi tripe and "It's the Jews! They run the media! They're stealing our money! NOTHING IS SAFE FROM THEIR JEWY JEWY HANDS!" Do you have a source for jewish people being the main source of bank fraud and outsourcing (which is a bizarre reason to form a political party)?

What makes the national socialist *cough*trying to pretty up by not calling themselves Nazis*cough* movement nationalist? And not just based on a pervasive sense of unwarranted national and racial superiority? Your ideology lost, 70 years ago, just let it die.

Edit: Wow, your edited post is even more anti-semetic than before, impressive.

[Denny Crane!]

Yes yes yes, more Nazi tripe and "It's the Jews! They run the media! They're stealing our money! NOTHING IS SAFE FROM THEIR JEWY JEWY HANDS!" Do you have a source for jewish people being the main source of bank fraud and outsourcing (which is a bizarre reason to form a political party)?

What makes the national socialist *cough*trying to pretty up by not calling themselves Nazis*cough* movement nationalist? And not just based on a pervasive sense of unwarranted national and racial superiority? Your ideology lost, 70 years ago, just let it die.

Edit: Wow, your edited post is even more anti-semetic than before, impressive.

Well you know they say the only thing better than a load of nazi is even more nazi piled on top. Throw in tin foil hat conspiracy propaganda and you've got a bananarama trifle sunday of political hilarity.

[truth1337]

Do you have a source for jewish people being the main source of bank fraud

What race is Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller, Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb, Bernanke, Blankfein, Greenspan, Strauss-Kahn?

(which is a bizarre reason to form a political party)?

Why? You like the banking cartel?

What makes the national socialist *cough*trying to pretty up by not calling themselves Nazis*cough* movement nationalist?

Nationalism and national socialism are different things. Nationalism is a pacifist ideology represented by people like Napoleon III and Tsar Nicholaus. The principle is that people who like to organize their societies in different ways shouldn't share the same nation, but be different nations, so as to eliminate causes for racism. They noted that before nationalism, most wars were due to different ethnic groups sharing the same nations. There are all sorts of reasons for mistrust - if one group grows faster in population, it will become a majority and may repress the other group. Indeed a majority white society structurally represses blacks, because whites want a different organization than do blacks, and a black society structurally represses whites - white people would make a society where creating surplus and safety storage, and intelligence, are beneficial things - blacks would form a society where running fast and being a relaxed life-enjoying musician and good dancer are beneficial things for getting all the babes. Whites want to build social security and have fewer kids, but when mixed with blacks who have more kids, the whites end up paying for blacks. Etc etc. Napoleon III and Tsar Nicholaus were in the process of building that up, when globalists took over and created imperialism and communism.

And not just based on a pervasive sense of unwarranted national and racial superiority?

There is no supremacism in nationalism, but a recognition that all races have different strengths and weaknesses. White people have higher intelligence than blacks, but blacks run faster, for example. There is no built-in value system that says, intelligence would be worth more than running fast.

Edit: Wow, your edited post is even more anti-semetic than before, impressive.

Since when is it "anti-semitic" to criticise unrighteous individuals from the non-semitic tribe that the Khazar ashkenazi "Jews" are?

[removeduser_4536284751384]

Nationalism and national socialism are different things. Nationalism is a pacifist ideology represented by people like Napoleon III and Tsar Nicholaus. The principle is that people who like to organize their societies in different ways shouldn't share the same nation, but be different nations, so as to eliminate causes for racism. They noted that before nationalism, most wars were due to different ethnic groups sharing the same nations. There are all sorts of reasons for mistrust - if one group grows faster in population, it will become a majority and may repress the other group. Indeed a majority white society structurally represses blacks, because whites want a different organization than do blacks, and a black society structurally represses whites - white people would make a society where creating surplus and safety storage, and intelligence, are beneficial things - blacks would form a society where running fast and being a relaxed life-enjoying musician and good dancer are beneficial things for getting all the babes. Whites want to build social security and have fewer kids, but when mixed with blacks who have more kids, the whites end up paying for blacks. Etc etc. Napoleon III and Tsar Nicholaus were in the process of building that up, when globalists took over and created imperialism and communism.

[citation needed]

There is no supremacism in nationalism, but a recognition that all races have different strengths and weaknesses. White people have higher intelligence than blacks, but blacks run faster, for example. There is no built-in value system that says, intelligence would be worth more than running fast.

I remember another person like you posting some study about black people having lower brain volumes. Now apart from the fact that the study is nonsense because I know the genetics of body parts vary more within Africa than they do between the African "average" and anywhere else on Earth, women have lower brain volumes than men, yet studies trying to see if they are less intelligent have always found no difference.

[truth1337]

I remember another person like you posting some study about black people having lower brain volumes. Now apart from the fact that the study is nonsense because I know the genetics of body parts vary more within Africa than they do between the African "average" and anywhere else on Earth, women have lower brain volumes than men, yet studies trying to see if they are less intelligent have always found no difference.

I wouldn't post an article about brain volumes, since I know full well it is insignificant. I'm close friends with at least 15 doctors and have read most of their course literature myself. I'm referring to IQ, in which the majority of people who came from African countries to Europe have an average of around 60 IQ, while the Middle East had 70, and white people had around 105. But why do you focus only on the intelligence aspect? Do you deny that Africans run faster and have other talents?

[Blau&Gruen]

Why are fascists so comical?

It is tradgical somehow. It shows how difficult it is for a child to escape the memory of the traumatic experiences of the parents and grandparents.

[frozenprince]

What race is Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller, Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb, Bernanke, Blankfein, Greenspan, Strauss-Kahn?

Jewish people aren't a "race". And you've presented nothing indicating just why their race makes them more inclined to commit bank fraud, or any cases of each individual committing such. Outdated Nazi ideology is outdated, try again.

Why? You like the banking cartel?

I was talking about outsourcing being a bizarre platform for a political party.

Nationalism and national socialism are different things. Nationalism is a pacifist ideology represented by people like Napoleon III and Tsar Nicholaus. The principle is that people who like to organize their societies in different ways shouldn't share the same nation, but be different nations, so as to eliminate causes for racism. They noted that before nationalism, most wars were due to different ethnic groups sharing the same nations. There are all sorts of reasons for mistrust - if one group grows faster in population, it will become a majority and may repress the other group. Indeed a majority white society structurally represses blacks, because whites want a different organization than do blacks, and a black society structurally represses whites - white people would make a society where creating surplus and safety storage, and intelligence, are beneficial things - blacks would form a society where running fast and being a relaxed life-enjoying musician and good dancer are beneficial things for getting all the babes. Whites want to build social security and have fewer kids, but when mixed with blacks who have more kids, the whites end up paying for blacks. Etc etc. Napoleon III and Tsar Nicholaus were in the process of building that up, when globalists took over and created imperialism and communism.

My god, in this inane wall of words you call making a point, you presented nothing that can be construed as a logical answer to any problems at all. I love how you have to illustrate how the white people are the ones building all the helpful infrastructure and safety nets, while black people just want to go out and play their hippity-hop music and buy chains and grills and rims. It's laughably ignorant at best. I mean come on man, you really believe in that horrible "White people act like this, BUT BLACK PEOPLE ACT LIKE THIS!" joke as real life?

By the way, again, bi-racial. Does that make it so I can only ever be half as intelligent as you?

There is no supremacism in nationalism, but a recognition that all races have different strengths and weaknesses. White people have higher intelligence than blacks, but blacks run faster, for example. There is no built-in value system that says, intelligence would be worth more than running fast.

Yes, there is supremacy implied in these points. Even if you can't see it, by making these idiotic points in your posts. By the way, you're wrong, present to me absolute, undeniable evidence that white people are more intelligent. You're inane white supremacy tangents are getting quite old.

Since when is it "anti-semitic" to criticise unrighteous individuals from the non-semitic tribe that the Khazar ashkenazi "Jews" are?

When you dedicate an entire post to just how bad the "jews" are. It tends to be anti-semetic.

I'm not your research assistant, or your primary school teacher. These things are all well-known facts which you can find in every serious encyclopedia. Here's a starting point for reading about the first of the above used facts that every primary school kid should know:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism#History

In other words, you have no source, so it's nothing more than random conjecture and incorrect assumptions?

[truth1337]

Jewish people aren't a "race"

http://forward.com/articles/155742/j...-reveal/?p=all

And you've presented nothing indicating just why their race makes them more inclined to commit bank fraud

Why would I want to argue that? That would be racist.

or any cases of each individual committing such

I gave you a list of names involved in Goldman-Sachs, the Fed, and IMF, all of which are institutionalized fraud.

I was talking about outsourcing being a bizarre platform for a political party.

Being against outsourcing, i.e. what is known as protectionism, you mean?

"White people act like this, BUT BLACK PEOPLE ACT LIKE THIS!" joke as real life?

Are you claiming there are no statistical differences between different races?

Yes, there is supremacy implied in these points. Even if you can't see it, by making these idiotic points in your posts.

Citation needed

By the way, you're wrong, present to me absolute, undeniable evidence that white people are more intelligent.

What type of argument or study would you take as proof?

When you dedicate an entire post to just how bad the "jews" are. It tends to be anti-semetic.

Show me where I said all Jews are bad. You'll get nowhere by inane racist accusations.