HOUSE OF HADER
Well I like the chap already: "it became apparent that I also needed to learn mapping too, I wanted a map that didn't include the Americas." - quite right too, damn colonials
A very well presented application. Time to dig into the details...
Patronized by Paedric Patron of Knonfoda and Maurits
A Rickety Old Bookcase
Thanks to Emperor of Hell for the original avatar and FrostySOTF for the update
Go here to get yours
~ Tale of the Week ~ Creative Writing ~ The Writers' Lounge ~ After Action Reports ~ MAARC/BAARC ~
Firstly I want to say, a first class application, I have been following WotW for some time now, all very exciting. What initially strikes me, is the willingness to help and share his work with others.I look forward to my research, but first impression is I like what I see.
'Proud to be patronised by cedric37(My Father and My Guardian)
Well at first glance it looks impressive, but there are quite a lot of beta and wip entries. If the Road to Jerusalem mod is going to be released in September it may be that this would have been better delayed for a few weeks. That said, his help threads really are very helpful and he appears to make corrections and then provide reasons why he's done it to help people along which is heartening.
Still digging though, any of the modders have any opinions on the work he has completed?
Oh, and very important, any infractions?
Patronized by Paedric Patron of Knonfoda and Maurits
A Rickety Old Bookcase
Thanks to Emperor of Hell for the original avatar and FrostySOTF for the update
Go here to get yours
~ Tale of the Week ~ Creative Writing ~ The Writers' Lounge ~ After Action Reports ~ MAARC/BAARC ~
I have been following the Applicant for a while, from January on to be precise and I thought and think him being on the right track, but I as well think he's not quite there yet.
His Tutorials are ok and his attitude is fine, but the only other valid contribution is his Texture rework and that's based off of a predecessor and is not entirely his creation.
Everything else is just unreleased and only previewed WIP.
Personally I find it sad to see him brought before us too soon. And why a beta release of The Road to Jerusalem with his map included was not waited for is beyond me.
Edit: ybbon![]()
Last edited by Aikanár; August 09, 2012 at 05:14 PM. Reason: spelling, spelling aaaaand spelling...
I would ask where this fellow was hiding but it seems he's been hoping all over the place. A clever ruse to keep those potential patrons off his trail indeed.
I look forward to seeing all that danny X has contributed. Looks like another stellar applicant.
Devoirs The Empress
PS @ ybbon66, Some of us are still Loyals; 200 years too late mind but we're here!![]()
The Lordz Modding Collective
"The LMC expects every modder to do his Duty" - not by Lord Nelson
"Blow it out your arse." - Halie Satanus
The Eagle Standard
Too bad most stuff isn't released
Mhmm...
Oh and btw:
Zero.any infractions?
@Aiki, thx for the profile link![]()
![]()
@MBA: Welcome Bruder!
Maybe a case of interest in this regard: http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=529523
It seems that he's done a lot, but the abundance of WIP work concerns me. Correct me if I'm wrong, but in essence this application boils down to positive posting and two completed maps?![]()
I am told it takes a lot of work to map well in M2TW which encourages me to vote yes but not sure if two maps will be enough. If this was in September when his work has been released in some form it would have been very easy decision.
Aik: compared to Russian Gondor's application I'm not sure this one is much stronger tbh. Just my opinion though.
Last edited by Robin de Bodemloze; August 10, 2012 at 09:02 AM.
The Wings of Destiny - A FotS AAR (Chapter 12 - Updated Apr 24)
Takeda - a Shogun 2 AAR (Completed) Reviewed by Radzeer
My writing | My art | About me | Sekigahara Campaign - Developer
~~Under the proud patronage of Radzeer, Rogue Bodemloze. Patron of Noif de Bodemloze, Heiro de Bodemloze, and Hitai de Bodemloze~~
I offered citizenship himself, and he accepted until SoP offered too, but now I see why, Im afraid Im a little ignorant.
I will certainly be voting yes, as I know this candidate's work well.
[Citizen] danny X (Patron: SonofPeverel)
*Looks up*
Whoops, looks like another modding appl. {Dives for cover}. I'll wait til the dust settles then come back...
....
![]()
I think his mapping is sufficient for citizenship, along with his attitude in the forum, that is all.
Well maybe we've had some too easy applications recently, looks at current votes... so a bit of healthy debate will get rid of any cobweb's hmm?
I'm not sure there is enough here yet, as others have said, had he waited until the main mod with his map was released it would be a far bigger influence even if it was a public beta that would be good enough, but it isn't and thus we should be judging on what we can see now without loading mapping tools or downloading unreleased work to review. Right now, I am thinking not, but, assuming the mod is released by the time he re-applies, it would be a whole lot more positive then.
Patronized by Paedric Patron of Knonfoda and Maurits
A Rickety Old Bookcase
Thanks to Emperor of Hell for the original avatar and FrostySOTF for the update
Go here to get yours
~ Tale of the Week ~ Creative Writing ~ The Writers' Lounge ~ After Action Reports ~ MAARC/BAARC ~
That's no convincing comparison. If you have someone working as artist for a mod, as mapper, he DID the work, you saw it, it hasn't been released yet, but the work has been done. It could of course happen the mod project getting pulped, it happened before of course - like art was finished for it already completely, so all work by the artist was done, he just waited for the mod leader since that guy releases it all as complete project in public. While I don't say it's worth a "full contribution" it is completely different to what you say at ^this comparison.Hey I know somebody who thinks well, but he did not post it yet, deal?
The principle is the same.
The map has been crafted but not released.
The thought has been thought but not posted
You cannot prove whether or not the mod will be released in the future.
You cannot prove whether the thoughts will be posted in the future.
Just because the raw data is one somebody's hdd (mine, yours, a hundred peoples) does not make it a released mod.
Just because the raw data is in ones brain(yours, mine, a hundred peoples) does not make it a posted post.
Granted, my answer was a little provoking but seriously I do expect better from councillor's than just voting in favour or disfavour for or against somebody just because of "knowing" somebody.
This is about solid contributions, not about merely liking or knowing somebody.
I seriously have troubles with this sort of working attitude, because it's defying all former and future applicants who worked hard and contributed to reach their desire.
No, the principle is not the same. Making a map contains of three steps:
Thinking of how you do it.
Then actually do it.
Then publish it somehow.
While making good posts is doable in two steps:
Thinking what you wanna say.
Then posting it.
At the first one, the work or the main work aspect lies on the first two, while at posting the main aspect, the work lies in writing your actual thoughts down - so the weight is another one. While it could be said that there are some similar components in it, for me personally this comparison is invalid.
No-one said otherwise.Just because the raw data is one somebody's hdd (mine, yours, a hundred peoples) does not make it a released mod.
Of course not.Just because the raw data is in ones brain(yours, mine, a hundred peoples) does not make it a posted post.
I guess you rather missed my point then. Where did I say I will vote for him ? I do merely know the applicant, in fact never really had to do anything with him, why should I vote in favor cause I know him ?Granted, my answer was a little provoking but seriously I do expect better from councillor's than just voting in favour or disfavour for or against somebody just because of "knowing" somebody.
I did not say anything what I vote yet, I might be voting no, I might be voting yes - all I disagreed with totally is the (imo bad) comparison
No-one questions that.This is about solid contributions, not about merely liking or knowing somebody.
If you are referring to the general attitude of voting for someone cause you like him agreed - if you are referring to me now I do take this rather hostile as I have not said (and btw not dug enough) what my decision will be I merely argue that (for me personally) there is a difference in just no work and unreleased work. (And again to not get it wrong, I don't say unreleased work counts as contribution, I rather judge it that way: It is a pro for attitude, a pro for being involved, and willing (proof to be willing to contribute) so I see it that way which doesn't mean it is worth nothing but isn't worth as much as a "modding contribution" once released either.)I seriously have troubles with this sort of working attitude, because it's defying all former and future applicants who worked hard and contributed to reach their desire.
I was not talking about how many steps a process takes to be concluded, but about the underlying basic principle of creation and this is the same. If I've failed to express myself conprehensible I'm sorry for that and apologise.
Lets say it's a rather long and well thought post and that the author writes a draft of it before publishing it.
The steps itself do not matter to the basic principle of creation which starts with a thought and ends with the finished product.
You can insert as many steps in this process of creation as you want to, the basic principle of it remains the same, just the techniques and steps change.
I've never specified what kind of post I was talking about, just in general, as I was talking in general about "work", but if the might help, think of the post as an article for any given publication or any other well thought post you would count as a valid contribution discussion- or debatewise.
Besides that I was not referring to you, at all. I was directly, including quote, referring to a statement of another councillor and was obviously referring in general to this.
Have you noted the new paragraph and in this me adressing my answer to the other councillor which included my generalisation? How could I start a paragraph with "Granted, my answer was ..." and adress somebody with it I have not responded to prior to the post (you)?
I only could've been adressing you when I would've written something like "Granted, my answer is ..." which.
See above.
And there was a Poll.
Also, sorry for the delay. There was a small technical problem.