Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Corrections regarding Ghurids

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Corrections regarding Ghurids

    As per the BC 2.3.2 version, Sultan Muhammed bin Sam is the ruler of the Ghurids. However this was not the case. As per information ,it was his elder brother Ghiyas ad din bin Sam who was the sultan of the Ghurids.

    I hope the 2.4 version may represent this.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    His death occurred in the year 1203 AD

  3. #3
    wudang_clown's Avatar Fire Is Inspirational
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    7,357

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    As per what information? Could you cite it?

    Under the patronage of m_1512

  4. #4

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghiyasuddin_Ghori
    http://www.afghanan.net/afghanistan/ghorids.htm

    http://www.ibiblio.org/britishraj/Ja...chapter03.html
    Ala-ad-din, the “World-burner,” was content to rule his clan at Firoz-kuh; but after his death in 1161, and that of his son two years later, his nephew Ghiyas-ad-din ibn Sam became chief of Ghor, and with his accession the Afghan highlanders entered upon a new phase of activity. Ghiyas-ad-din recovered Ghazni from the mob of Ghuzz in 1173–4, and established his brother Mu’izz-ad-din on the ruined throne of Mahmud. The two brothers exercised a joint sovereignty, but while the elder maintained his hereditary chiefdom in his forefathers’ castle of the “Hill of Victory,” Mu’izz-ad-din, commonly known as Mohammad Ghori, led a series of campaigns in India which recalled the glorious days of the Idol-breaker nearly two centuries before. For thirty years Mahmud had ravaged Hindustan from the Indus to the Ganges; and for thirty years Mohammad Ghori harried the same country in the same way.

    Well, the brothers trusted each other so much that none interfered in each others affairs. Ghiyas ad din was campaigning in the west while his brother looked to the east to india. The best of the spoils of the war was always given to his elder brother.

    With his death Muhammed of Ghor becomes the next Sultan.

    Unlike his borther, however he lost the battle of Balkh.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Also is it possible to script the emergence of the Delhi Sultanate by the Death of Muhammed of Ghor?. That would really be great. Their city would be Delhi Only. So if Dilli is not conquered, there can no Delhi Sultanate!

  6. #6
    wudang_clown's Avatar Fire Is Inspirational
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    7,357

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    I was confused a bit because they both were Muhammads bin Sam, but it is Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad that is faction leader, so there is no mistake in the game.

    According to information on their coins, only after Ghiyath al-Din's death Muizz al-Din took the tile of al-sultan al-azam, but I think it wouldn't be incorrect to treat their dominions as two separate realms, thought tied closely together. Just an opposite to relations between Tekish and Sultan Shah...

    About the script - it is possible, theoretically, but whether we will do it - let it be a surprise.

    Under the patronage of m_1512

  7. #7

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Quite frankly I Hate surprises

    Anyway another suggestion is regarding the ancillary of governorship that a character acquires when in a city.
    The problem is I can't remove them from the console command, especially when i put another governor in his place. I hope it is resolved in 2.4. So that any governor who stays out of a settlement must lose his governorship, especially when he is commanding an army. Because all that I find is that once a governor ,always a governor...which shudnt be the case.

    And regarding the Rajputs, What I suggest is to replace the Kshatriya trait with the Rajput caste trait. The types of caste traits can be Suryavanshi Rajput, Agnivanshi Rajput and Chandravanshi Rajput. Of course they shud give the same benefits in attributes.

  8. #8
    wudang_clown's Avatar Fire Is Inspirational
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    7,357

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Why should we assume that a governor loses his office while campaigning? I don't think it ever happened just because a governor went to war.

    Besides, you don't have to use command console. Governor title is movable, you can just grant it to another character by using your mouse, just drag it between characters.

    Under the patronage of m_1512

  9. #9

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Jeez!..Thanks! I didn't knew that!

  10. #10

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Just wanted to ask....How do I get to upgrade Huge Stone walls?...I am in year 1250 A.D and my city of Lahore has more than 30k+ population...

  11. #11
    wudang_clown's Avatar Fire Is Inspirational
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    7,357

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Huge stone walls are the last level, you can't build anything bigger.

    Under the patronage of m_1512

  12. #12

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    And if you're trying to upgrade TO Huge Stone Walls, you need 40 000 people.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Corrections regarding Ghurids

    Well k/t....I think you should be the official replier to every question posted here. Thanks!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •