[HS] THE King of Rivers and Hills

[complete noob:(]

Stormys up

[Pinkie Pie]

The smell of burning Riverlanders is sweet upon the nose.

For those that believe this is a chance to strike at a Stormking busy with other borders, try it and find out just how many of my men are sitting around doing nothing while my king and Dondarrion lead their armies to war.

Next.

[Lord AcidRocker]

This hs moved fast today. I was waiting with popcorn in hand when I ran my diplomat through that area in my previous turn

[Pinkie Pie]

This hs moved fast today. I was waiting with popcorn in hand when I ran my diplomat through that area in my previous turn

I have only one responce to you spying on me.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Lord AcidRocker]

After that backstab in TPW, I trust no one

[Dux]

Hmm it seems that losing those men was rather a good turn of events. For the first time I'm actually having a profit! Money money money money. Finally for the first time since turn 1, I can retrain my men and train some new ones


Hoare attacked Flint's Finger with two full stacks, (why such a force is necessary for a castle with one unit is beyond me ) . I destroyed it to prevent them from having a recruitment base in the North.


Also, slowly conquering the south of the North. Moat Cailin is under siege!
I figure that force of Hugo is not enough to prevent it. If it is then I'm again seriously unlucky. Ah well, I'll take my chances.

House Bolton will conquer the north or die trying!

[The Guy With No Imagination]

Isnt destruction now against the rules thanks to you yourself Dux? Im pretty sure the rule was implemented although not updated in the op...hmmm time to investigate!!

[Dux]

Isnt destruction now against the rules thanks to you yourself Dux? Im pretty sure the rule was implemented although not updated in the op...hmmm time to investigate!!

I don't believe the rule was added because nobody supported it. Lord Acid rockter said something like if 3 more people support this then I will implant it. But that didn't happen.

But I'll replay if the rule is added.

[Pinkie Pie]

I believe he can destroy buildings as long as noone of his enemies have an army large enough to beat the garrison ithin a turns range.

[The Guy With No Imagination]

But then it would seem Hoare is already attacking Flint's Finger, which would then make it a rule violation? Not sure, honestly just curious and totally not trying to inconvenience my beloathed enemy

Just kidding I love Dux

[The Guy With No Imagination]

damn the laggy twc doubleposting stuff. DELETE

[xXAmonXx]

so should i upload or not? I overslept this morning (damn influenza)
either way, it's gonna be up after my first class.

[xXAmonXx]

I sure do wish that armies defeated by people ahead of you weren't allowed to run away..
I could have had King Lancel in a tough spot

[xXAmonXx]

this is what admin should be doing about the past two turns

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Peteriscoolz]

It's not in the rules.

[Peteriscoolz]

Well it should of been updated in the OP, which is was not. Thus making it invalid. I mean am I expected to dig through every page looking for new rules.

[Lord AcidRocker]

I have updated the first post, apologies as I've been away.

I believe there were not enough votes to change the rule in order to make it that it would be UN-acceptable to burn down your settlement at any time, such as if you're under siege. If people want it to be that way, give me 3 yes' and I'll change it. Last time I didn't get that many, IIRC.

[OberynMartell]

Yes number 1.

[Peteriscoolz]

burn down your settlement at any time,

So you can't burn down any building in any settlement at all even when you are not under siege and just looking for income by destroying it?

[Lord AcidRocker]

Yep

The rule can be amended as desired as long as it has 3 votes