Page 60 of 113 FirstFirst ... 103550515253545556575859606162636465666768697085110 ... LastLast
Results 1,181 to 1,200 of 2441

Thread: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 29th May)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bearnation54 View Post
    Since jack posted pictures of Greek Amour
    Pretty sure that'd be against the ToS.
    'When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing — they believe in anything. '

    -Emile Cammaerts' book The Laughing Prophets (1937)

    Under the patronage of Nihil. So there.

  2. #2
    Tiro
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    212

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Just a quess -_- I'd love to see barbarian or anything for that matter. Can anyone explain to me what kind of armour the one is with the 3 circles on it. Iv never seen that kind

  3. #3
    Primicerius
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    3,522

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Quote Originally Posted by Bearnation54 View Post
    Just a quess -_- I'd love to see barbarian or anything for that matter. Can anyone explain to me what kind of armour the one is with the 3 circles on it. Iv never seen that kind
    That armor looks like an Italic piece. Probably Samnite or Oscan. Correct me if those two peoples are the same.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    I enjoyed the new ideas ,specially the height for the men.But if the men will have diferent height ,it would be more awsome to see the horses with diferent sizes according with the nations.
    A iberian horse was alot smaller but very resistant,germanic horses would be huge horses, etc,etc.
    Last edited by oOIYvYIOo; January 11, 2013 at 01:47 PM.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Quote Originally Posted by oOIYvYIOo View Post
    I enjoyed the new ideas ,specially the height for the men.But if the men will have diferent height ,it would be more awsome to see the horses with diferent sizes according with the nations.
    Form their horse-preview, I had the impression that there will be indeed differences in their height (but maybe I'm wrong and they just rendered them with different sizes). Here is a comparison:

  6. #6
    wangrin's Avatar Unguibus et Rostro
    Patrician Artifex

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    France
    Posts
    4,397

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Jack Lusted wrote in his last post (Exclusive Content and Dev chat for Total War Center) :

    Q. How tall will soldiers be, will soldier height vary inside a unit and between Romans and Germanics, and why do some shields seem to be smaller than they were in reality?

    A. The base skeleton for soldiers in Rome II is 1.7m tall or around 5’ 6”. We will be portraying height differences between say the Romans and the Germanics, though there is a limit to how much we can scale the skeleton before animations start to look weird in combat. There will also be variation in height between soldiers in the same unit for the first time in a Total War game.
    My question is about skeletons.
    Will it be possible for modder to add new skeletons or will they be hardcoded like for ETW/NTW ?
    Even if adding new skeletons and animations need a large amount of work, it is the kind of feature that should and even must be possible.


    « Le courage, c’est de ne pas subir la loi du mensonge triomphant qui passe, et de ne pas faire écho de notre āme, de notre bouche et de nos mains aux applaudissements imbéciles et aux huées fanatiques.. » Jean JAURES

  7. #7
    torongill's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Canary Islands
    Posts
    5,786

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Quote Originally Posted by wangrin View Post
    Jack Lusted wrote in his last post (Exclusive Content and Dev chat for Total War Center) :
    My question is about skeletons.
    Will it be possible for modder to add new skeletons or will they be hardcoded like for ETW/NTW ?
    Even if adding new skeletons and animations need a large amount of work, it is the kind of feature that should and even must be possible.
    Mark me curious: why would you need new skeletons? I mean, unless you're going for a LOTR mod and you need a Balrog/Mountain Troll/Ent/Goblin/Orc, then all the skeletons for people, horses, camels, elephants and even dogs and wildlife are already present.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibernicus II View Post
    What's EB?
    "I Eddard of the house Stark, Lord of Winterfell and Warden of the North, sentence you to die."
    "Per Ballista ad astra!" - motto of the Roman Legionary Artillery.
    Republicans in all their glory...

  8. #8
    wangrin's Avatar Unguibus et Rostro
    Patrician Artifex

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    France
    Posts
    4,397

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    New skeletons are needed for "fantasy" mods, of course, but they will be of great help, for exemple, to create different horses (size) or adding ox.
    I ask for modability, too much "little details" were hardcoded in ETW/NTW/S2TW.
    CA had to think about giving the possibility to modify the game.

    Skeleton could be defined in db tables for example (skeleton name, filepath, etc.).

    It's the same for flags, they could have been define in db tables (particle model shape, textures, etc.). Doing so, it could have been possible to create unique regimental flags in ETW/NTW.

    Same for an "unit evolution system" using the same mechanism than "unit to government change" system in ETW. Instead of hardcoding the "replacing unit" function, it could have been a LUA script, or even easier for modders, a db table that would have tied technology, old unit, new unit, evolution cost and using a similar.
    Last edited by wangrin; January 11, 2013 at 04:27 PM.


    « Le courage, c’est de ne pas subir la loi du mensonge triomphant qui passe, et de ne pas faire écho de notre āme, de notre bouche et de nos mains aux applaudissements imbéciles et aux huées fanatiques.. » Jean JAURES

  9. #9

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Will the later roman soldiers have less variety of armour and weapons per unit?
    Because, when the roman army was reformed all the soldiers had the same standard armour.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Oh this is awesome news and updates thnx Jack!

  11. #11
    Civis
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    183

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    indeed! thanks for the talkbalk, and those armours look great. Loving the variety so far... everything you guys are doing art-wise, just makes me more confident CA can back it up with gameplay. Cheers!
    TRIPTYCK
    'Carthago delenda est.'

  12. #12

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    thanks for the update jack, hopefully within the next few days we will get a new faction reveal (hoping it's the Greeks) =)

  13. #13
    Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,736

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Yay a new update! I'm impressed about finally getting different height soldiers, it's something we've been waiting for since we stopped having clone units in Med II. Just one question though, will we also be seeing the larger-girthed gentleman be making his appearance on the battlefield?

    A semi-serious question by the way. While I'm joking about having a legion of fatties (although that could be understandable for militia), I do wonder if there is also going to be stockier and skinnier soldiers?
    Last edited by Bobz; January 11, 2013 at 07:03 PM.

  14. #14
    Rijul.J.Ballal's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Argon
    Posts
    2,415

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    This is so great!

  15. #15
    Rijul.J.Ballal's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Argon
    Posts
    2,415

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    maybe there could be Bobz

  16. #16

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Spolas and Italic disc plate looks awesome. I'd be curious to see the reference for the shoulder pieces for the Italian disc armor - not that I doubt their historicity, I just am unfamiliar with it but really like it.

  17. #17
    Maleventum's Avatar Decanus
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Samnium, Italia
    Posts
    508

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ahiga View Post
    Spolas and Italic disc plate looks awesome. I'd be curious to see the reference for the shoulder pieces for the Italian disc armor - not that I doubt their historicity, I just am unfamiliar with it but really like it.
    this kind of armour was typical of Lucani and Bruttii (Oscan people)

  18. #18

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Will the later roman soldiers have less variety of armour and weapons per unit?
    Because, when the roman army was reformed all the soldiers had the same standard armour.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Quote Originally Posted by Filosofilus View Post
    Will the later roman soldiers have less variety of armour and weapons per unit?
    Because, when the roman army was reformed all the soldiers had the same standard armour.
    I would like Jack to answer this question as well. I suppose just because they had the same weapons and armor doesnt mean that the roman empire diddnt improve. When they expanded afther Hannibal they must have improved their fighting techniques when facing Phalanxes, germanic barbarians, horsearchers and cataphracts etc etc. I quess new technology will bring new kinds of formations to face these different threats. Testudo`s, maybe different techs to improve on the discipline of infantry. So they can be used better offensively. They could make units behind the front row to take over exhausted units with fresh troops behind them to improve their stamina and maybe charge the enemy while they are winded. Relying on their good discipline.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Exclusive Content for TWC Discussion Thread (Updated 11th Jan)

    Will normal infantry be able to use the pilum (a missile weapon)? Because previously you said that there would be no mixed weapons within a unit.

    Sorry for my bad English

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •