Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Alright well there were a few ppl asking what i saw CPU wise with Shogun 2 going from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge.

    Specs listed below,

    2500k
    ECS P67 H2 A2 Black Deluxe
    Mushkin Redlines 1866MHz 9-10-9 27 1T
    ASUS 7970 DirectCu II TOP

    3770k
    Biostar TZ77XE4
    Mushkin RedLines 1866 9-10-9 27 1T
    ASUS 7970 DirectCu II TOP

    STOCK on both CPUs

    Minimum
    2500k = 22
    3770k = 27

    Average
    2500k = 29
    3770k = 33

    Overclocked @ 4.4 GHz on both CPUs
    Minimum
    2500k = 24
    3770k = 31

    Average
    2500k = 30
    3770k = 36

    Overclocked 4.6 GHz 3770k my 2500k wasnt a good clocker it maxed at 4.4 i would love to offer more data but this is all i can provide for the time being.
    Minimum = 33
    Average = 38

    turning off hyper-threading did not impact performance either, so at stock 2500k vs 3570k and 2600k vs 3770k it looks the difference remain pretty much the same for both.

    When minimum frames per second is looked at comparing stock CPU speeds
    Ivy Bridge is 22% faster than Sandy bridge

    When looking at average frames per second at stock CPU speeds
    Ivy Bridge is 13% faster than Sandy Bridge

    When comparing minimum frame rate at 4.4 Ghz on both CPUs
    Ivy Bridge is 25% faster than Sandy Bridge

    When comparing average frame rate at 4.4 Ghz on both CPUs
    Ivy Bridge is 20% faster than Sandy Bridge

    That would mean this graph seen on the forums multiple times looks to be fairly accurate people will need to remember GPU choice, memory speeds etc DO impact Shogun 2's CPU test albiet very minor examples a 6950 vs 7970 the system with 7970 in the CPU test will gain an extra 1-1.5 fps, faster memory, on top of lower latencies will also improve frame rate further, for example if i could get 2133 fully stable i would gain another 1-2FPS with my particular GPU over 1866Mhz so keep these things in mind.

    Last edited by Crazyeyesreaper; June 29, 2012 at 09:53 PM.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  2. #2
    Jaketh's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    8,973

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Im using an old i7 870 and can run it maxed, if you have any i7 you will be fine.

  3. #3
    AngryTitusPullo's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    13,018

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaketh View Post
    Im using an old i7 870 and can run it maxed, if you have any i7 you will be fine.
    i3 can also run everything max. It just a question of how fast. My old Pentium 4 1.7 also runs ETW, which takes around 5-10 minutes per turn. 30 minutes mid turn.


    CIVITATVS CVM AVGVSTVS XVI, MMVI
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites SVB MareNostrum SVB Quintus Maximus
    Want to know more about Rome II Total Realism ? Follow us on Twitter & Facebook

  4. #4
    GasMask's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,798

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Quote Originally Posted by LestaT View Post
    i3 can also run everything max. It just a question of how fast. My old Pentium 4 1.7 also runs ETW, which takes around 5-10 minutes per turn. 30 minutes mid turn.
    My I3 cant run it maxed it lags during fighting .

  5. #5

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaketh View Post
    Im using an old i7 870 and can run it maxed, if you have any i7 you will be fine.
    Yeah, that's not exactly what you need to run it maxed, hell an FX can run the thing maxed...
    Under the Patronage of Leonidas the Lion|Patron of Imperator of Rome - Dewy - Crazyeyesreaper|American and Proud

  6. #6
    Jaketh's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    8,973

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Quote Originally Posted by Bolkonsky View Post
    Yeah, that's not exactly what you need to run it maxed, hell an FX can run the thing maxed...
    Its the graphics department where Shogun 2 will nail you to the wall. Luckily i have GTX580 so my frames never drop below 40 so long as i have all those useless settings turned off like SSAO

  7. #7
    Blau&Gruen's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wagadougou, Bourkina Faso
    Posts
    5,545

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    How does SH2 run on HD4000?
    Last edited by Blau&Gruen; May 29, 2012 at 04:03 AM.
    Patronized by Ozymandias
    Je bâtis ma demeure
    Le livre des questions
    Un étranger avec sous le bras un livre de petit format

    golemzombiroboticvacuumcleanerstrawberrycream

  8. #8
    irishron's Avatar Cura Palatii
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cirith Ungol
    Posts
    47,023

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Quote Originally Posted by Blau&Gruen View Post
    How does SH2 run on HD4000?
    I doubt it will run at all, anymore, after the last round of patches.

  9. #9
    irishron's Avatar Cura Palatii
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cirith Ungol
    Posts
    47,023

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Check the S2 Tech forum. There is a member with a HD4200 and having trouble pulling up the game since FotS was released.

  10. #10
    Blau&Gruen's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wagadougou, Bourkina Faso
    Posts
    5,545

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Thx, I am going to have a look there.
    Patronized by Ozymandias
    Je bâtis ma demeure
    Le livre des questions
    Un étranger avec sous le bras un livre de petit format

    golemzombiroboticvacuumcleanerstrawberrycream

  11. #11

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    good

  12. #12
    Shocked's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,850

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Sigh I bought a Sandy bridge i5 a month before Ivy was released.. I could've waited but I didn't want to... I suppose the difference isn't gigantic..
    Computer specifications -
    GPU: GTX 780
    CPU: Intel i5 2500k overclocked @ 4 GHz
    RAM: 8 GB DDR3
    Motherboard: Asrock z77 extreme 4

  13. #13
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    if it makes you feel better, i paid $315 on the 3770k vs $220 on the 2500k, my 2500k is the worst clocking 2500k ive ever seen,

    for $100 price difference the performance increase is tiny, but due to better memory clocking etc their are ways to further improve performance on Ivy Bridge, that said 99% of users do not need Ivy to get better performance, no to mention my 2500k topped at 55c vs my ivy bridge hitting 85c so keep that in mind due to the switch to TIM instead of solder underneath the IHS on the CPU Ivy gets hot sandy bridge does not.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  14. #14

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    ^Have you tried using 2800mhz ddr3 RAM?

  15. #15
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    no i havent, im not paying an obscene amount of money for said memory,

    in Shogun 2 each 300-400 mhz jump in memory speed might gain you 1fps after 1866MHz so going from 1866 to 2800 might gain 3 fps

    3fps isnt worth the cost or headaches

    example

    Gskill Trident X kit http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231595
    2600MHz many Z77 motherboards wont even boot with said memory installed when it works its amazing otherwise its a crap shoot,

    1866 MHz = $55
    2400 MHz = $100
    2600 MHz = $200

    for 8GB kit 2x4GB thats a cost increase of more then $145 for 3-4 fps in the CPU bench only in game performance it can be seen on the minimum FPS range but otherwise you dont feel any difference doesnt impact loading speeds etc,

    I would test it if i was given a kit that could do those speeds but yea not gonna pay for it myself to test it.

    After 1866MHz unless your using extreme cooling its a worthless investment most of the time youll need an AIO water cooler, in order for the memory modules to fit which is another $100+ investment, just isnt worth it not for 1 game that does scale with memory

    At best with 2800-3000MHz DDR3 you might see 5 fps at best which compared to whats gained via CPU overclock makes it a worthless investment, Im also basing my findings on X79 platform with high speed memory, do to bandwidth being less aka dual channel of Z77 vs quad of X79 the gain may be less,

    essentially it boils down to this, i can't see the logic is spending $400-600 for a 16GB kit of memory vs $100 to gain 3-5 fps If you would like to provide me with said expensive kit(s) ill test them though haha
    Last edited by Crazyeyesreaper; June 05, 2012 at 02:06 PM.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  16. #16
    ♔KillZoneGB♔'s Avatar Ducenarius
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Gloucester UK
    Posts
    939

    Icon14 Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Quote Originally Posted by Crazyeyesreaper View Post

    essentially it boils down to this, i can't see the logic is spending $400-600 for a 16GB kit of memory vs $100 to gain 3-5 fps If you would like to provide me with said expensive kit(s) ill test them though haha

    I think the better route would to shut down hardware ports you don't use. via the bios and device manager

    a few examples: com port, fire wire, network card (if wireless is being used, note if you have to reinstall wifi, you will need to enable the network card, Once installed, the network card can then be disabled).

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Hard wired don't disable the network card


    Then slimming down MS o/s services.

    Last measure Running in aboveRealTime does yield a bit more, not advised for playing online tho .

    -----------------------------------------------


    Cheers for the thread Crazyeyesreaper

    Could you post your preferences.script and DX settings.

    Kind Regards

    Charlie

    System
    OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (TBA Win7 Prof)
    Processor: i7 4820K Ivy E @ 4.4Ghz (Mild OC), MB Sabertooth X79
    Memory: Kingston HyperX Fury Red 16GB DDR3-1600 Dual Kit (TBA to 64GB Quad 8X8GB)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX 670 Phantom (TBA SLI Nvida xxx)
    Water Cooled


  17. #17
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    CPU test is just generic settings dont apply, to it, its testing worst case senario cpu usage, nothing more,

    in game im running ultra unit sizes tweaked a bit, with everything else maxed out using 2x MSAA and MLAA 2.0 via catalyst control panel all smooth with 20 vs 20, 40 vs 40 can bog down a bit but not bad, my Sandy on the other hand got hit pretty hard.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

  18. #18
    Adreno's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    ZNSTD
    Posts
    1,029

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    Hey reaper or anyone else i have a few small questions regarding overclocking, just recently got a 3570k on a asus P68 v pro gen 3 (i know the Z77 should have been the choice as of now but i could get it this one at a massive discount due to one of my friends and is almost as good)

    Now i want to overclock it to say 4.6 ghz, ive read that sweet spot for ivy is pretty low voltage compared to sandy and should be around 1.15 for that.. which will make it run at 80c max at full load.. which should be very acceptable no?

    Im just not sure which settings to change.. some say change boost others say dont etc etc..

    I would just like to do an easy overclock that doesnt involve too much tinkering with things i cannot grasp :p

  19. #19
    Crazyeyesreaper's Avatar Primicerius
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Posts
    3,287

    Default Re: Shogun 2 CPU Test Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge

    For 4.6 i need 1.24v those at 1.15v are either a lying or b) have a golden chip ive only seen 1 chip do 4.6 under 1.2v

    that said use Intels Turbo

    leave all other features on,

    by using Turbo and vcore offset you find the stable volts for that turbo clock this allows the chip to down clock to 1.6ghz and under volt this lowers power draw significantly and due to Ivy using TIM instead of Solder on the inside will prolong the life of the TIM vs running high clock 24/7.

    I myself use boost clocking it just makes far more sense.

    for the 3570k

    set turbo multi to x45
    set your voltage offset so that your max volts are 1.2v id have to look up your mobos bios and i dont have the time or images at hand of said bios to telel you the right settings.

    but for turbo it really is as simple as setting board current to 150amps (depends on board)
    set voltage offset so under load to hit 1.2v
    set multi to x45, test stability do a few runs of Linpack OCCT Prime etc, dont run it long just test to see if it crashes or not if it doesnt try dropping volts or raise the multi to 46, test again if it passes for a bit drop volts again, rinse repeat

    untill you find a minimum stable voltage offset for your clock speed,

    i use a voltage offset which pushes up to 1.26v if needed but i max at 1.24 99% of the time. keep volts under 1.25 for long term stability and longevity of the chip also keeps temps managable.
    CPU: i7 3770K 4.6GHz / i7 4930K 4.4 GHz / i7 4770K 4.6 GHz
    CPU HSF: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Pro / Review Samples / Review Samples
    MOBO: Biostar TZ77XE4 / ASRock X79 Fatal1ty Champion / MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming
    RAM: Mushkin Redlines 2x4GB 1866 MHz / 4x4GB Gskill 2133 MHz / 2x4GB Kingston 2400 MHz
    GPU: Integrated / GTX 780 / HD 5450 Passive
    PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050w 80+ GOLD / NZXT Hale82 650w Modular / same
    CASE: Nanoxia DS1 / Nanoxia DS1 / Lian Li Test Bench
    HDD: 160 HDD / 512GB SSD + 120GB SSD + 5.5TB HDD / 60gb SSD

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •